System Dynamics: Toward a Language of Comparative Law?

American Journal of Comparative Law

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 719-

  Gerber, David J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346205407     PISSN: 0002919X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/840989     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. The force of objectives and methods within communities varies. Sometimes, for example, those within a discipline have an explicit and self-consciously-elaborated methodological canon, but disciplines may also operate with little more than tacitly held assumptions about goals and methods.
2. For discussion of the relationship between "method" and "objectives," see Justus Buchler, The Concept of Method (1961).
3. For general discussion of some of these issues, see, e.g., Herbert H. Clark, Arenas of Language Use (1992); Dell Hymes, Foundations in Sociolinguistics (1974) and Gillian Brown & George Yule, Discourse Analysis (1983). Given the introductory nature of this essay and the assigned space limitations, I will normally use footnote references only to provide the reader with general background on ideas and points
4. For general discussion of some of these issues, see, e.g., Herbert H. Clark, Arenas of Language Use (1992); Dell Hymes, Foundations in Sociolinguistics (1974) and Gillian Brown & George Yule, Discourse Analysis (1983). Given the introductory nature of this essay and the assigned space limitations, I will normally use footnote references only to provide the reader with general background on ideas and points
5. For general discussion of some of these issues, see, e.g., Herbert H. Clark, Arenas of Language Use (1992); Dell Hymes, Foundations in Sociolinguistics (1974) and Gillian Brown & George Yule, Discourse Analysis (1983). Given the introductory nature of this essay and the assigned space limitations, I will normally use footnote references only to provide the reader with general background on ideas and points