A framework for profiling a lake's riparian area development potential

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 391-400

  Jakes, Pamela J ^a   Schlichting, Ciara ^b   Anderson, Dorothy H ^c  

^a NORTH CENTRAL RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b Dahlgren Shardlow and Uban   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Land use change; Recreational development; Residential development; Riparian development

Indexed keywords

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS; HOUSING; LAND USE;

'CURRENT; AREA DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL; HOTSPOTS; LANDUSE CHANGE; MOST LIKELY; RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; RIPARIAN AREAS; RIPARIAN DEVELOPMENT;

LAKES;

LAKE; LAND USE PLANNING; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; RIPARIAN ZONE; WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; HOUSING; LAKE; LAND USE; LANDSCAPE; RIPARIAN ECOSYSTEM; SOCIAL ASPECT; UNITED STATES;

MINNESOTA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

RIPARIA;

EID: 0346186143     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.09.016     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anderson, K.A., Kelly, T.J., Sushak, R.M., Hagley, C.A., Jensen, D.A., Kreag, G.M., 1998. Public Perceptions of the Impacts, Use, and Future of Minnesota Lakes: Results of the Minnesota Lakes Survey, A joint publication by the University of Minnesota Sea Grant Program (SH2) and Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Office of Management and Budget Services, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St Paul, MN.
2. Association of Minnesota Counties, 2002. For Your Information: Land Use Management. St Paul, MN.
3. Bengston, D.N., 1986. Research Capacity in Developing Countries: An Evaluation of Public Forestry Research Institutions, Masters Thesis, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN.
4. Biko Associates, Inc. and BRW, Inc., 2000. Itasca County Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Goals, Objectives, and Implementation Tools. Minneapolis, MN.
5. Bondrup-Nielsen, S., 1994. Riparian zone management symposium summary. In: Singleton, J., (Ed.), R&D Report No. 9: Proceedings of the Symposium on Riparian Zone Management, Canadian Forest Service, Fredericton, NB, pp. 9-21.
6. Borchert, J.R., Orning, G., Stinchfield, D., Peterson, D., Maki, L., 1970. Minnesota's Lakeshore: Resources, Development, Policy Needs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
7. Cohen, P., Stinchfield, J., 1984. Shoreland Development Trends, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Shoreland Update Project Report 4
8. Daulton, D.K., Zanski, L.M., 1997. Price County Lakes Project: Protecting Water Quality and Your Lake, Price County Land Conservation Department, Phillips, WA.
9. Ellefson, P., Hibbard, C., Kilgore, M., Granskog, J., 2002. Legal, Institutional and Economic Indicators of Forest Conservation and Sustainable Management: Review and Evaluation of Available Information in the United States, Staff Paper Series no. 163, University of Minnesota, Department of Forest Resources, St Paul, MN.
10. Fitton, J.M., 1994. The role of the riparian zone as it relates to recreation activities. In: Singleton, J., (Ed.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Riparian Zone Management, R&D Report No. 9, Canadian Forest Service, Fredericton, NB, pp. 9-21.
11. Gebhardt, K., Leonard, S., Staidl, G., Prichard, D., 1990. Riparian Area Management: Riparian and Wetland Classification Review, U.S.D.I Bureau of Land Management Technical Reference 1737-5, Denver, CO
12. Hanson, P.L., Pfister, R., Boggs, K., Cook, B., Joy, J., Hinckley, D., 1995. Classification and Management of Montana's Riparian and Wetland Sites. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, Miscellaneous Publication No. 54, University of Montana, Missoula, MT.
13. Hawkins, C.P., 1994. What are riparian ecosystems and why are we worried about them?. In: Rasmussen, G.A., Dobrowolski, J.P. (Eds.), Riparian Resources: A Symposium on the Disturbances, Management, Economics, and Conflicts Associated with Riparian Ecosystems, Natural Resources and Environmental Issues, vol. 1. Utah State University, Logan, Utah.
14. Karypis, D., Matthews, C., Oleson, B., Schlichfing, C., Paakh, B., Steward, D., Hanson, S., 2000. Sustainable Lakes Planning Workbook, Minnesota Lakes Association, Brainerd, MN.
15. Kelly, T., Stinchfield, J., 1998. Lakeshore Development Patterns in Northeast Minnesota: Status and Trends, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Office of Management and Budget Services.
16. Machlis, G.E., McKendry, J.E., 1996. Maps and models for natural resource management: powerful tools from the social sciences. In: Ewert, A.W., (Ed.), Natural Resource Management: The Human Dimension, West-view Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 193-226.
17. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 1999. Recommendations for Protecting Public Shoreland on Minnesota Waters, Submitted by the DNR to State Legislature, April 1999
18. Montreal Process Working Group, 1999. Criteria and Indicators for the Conservation and Sustainable Management of Temperate and Boreal Forests, Montreal Process Liaison Office, Ottawa, Canada.
19. Myers, L.H., 1989. Riparian Area Management: Inventory and Monitoring Riparian Areas, USDI Bureau of Land Management Technical Reference 1737-3, Denver, CO
20. Parrish, J.B., Herman, D., Reyher, D., 1996. A Century of Change in Black Hills Forest and Riparian Ecosystems, USDA Forest Service Agricultural Experiment Station, B 722, South Dakota State University, Rapid City, SD.
21. Schroeder, H.W., 1996. Voices from Michigan's Black River: Obtaining Information on 'Special Places' for Natural Resource Planning. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, General Technical Report NC-184, St Paul, MN Daviel, S., 1994. Agenda 21: The Earth Summit Strategy to Save Our Planet, Earth Press, Boulder, CO.
22. Starfield, A.M., 1997. A pragmatic approach to modeling. Journal of Wildlife Management 61 (2), 261-270.
23. Stocek, R., 1994. The importance of riparian zones as wildlife habitat. In: Singleton, J., (Ed.), R&D Report No. 9: Proceedings of the Symposium on Riparian Zone Management, Canadian Forest Service, Fredericton, NB, pp. 9-21.
24. Stynes, D.J., Zheng, J.J., Stewart, S.I., 1997. Seasonal Homes and Natural Resources: Patterns of Use and Impact in Michigan, General Technical Report, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St Paul, MN.
25. Susskind, L., 1981. Citizen participation and consensus building in land use planning: a case study. In: de Neufville, J.I., (Ed.), The Land Use Policy Debate in the United States, Plenum Press, New York.
26. Tufte, E.R., 1983. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT.
27. University of Wisconsin, 2002. Planning for Natural Resources: A Guide to Including Natural Resources in Local Comprehensive Planning. Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Wisconsin-Madison/Extension and Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, WI.
28. Van Patten, S.R., no date. Survey of Residents and Seasonal Home Owners of the Hayward Lakes Area, Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL
29. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, 1996. In: Daulton, T., Hanna, C. (Eds.), Northern Wisconsin's lakes and shorelands: a report examining a resource under pressure, Robert E. Matteson Workshop: Protecting Inland Lakeshores of the North (appendix III.), 1996. Sigrud Olson Environment Institute, Northland College, Ashland, WI.
30. Zinser, C.I., 1995. Outdoor Recreation: United States National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands, Wiley, New York.