A rejoinder to the comments by Polettini and Stander

Statistics and Computing

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 339-342

  Muralidhar, Krishnamurty ^a   Saratov, Rathindra ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Confidentiality; Data masking; Disclosure risk; Perturbation; Statistical disclosure limitation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346171311     PISSN: 09603174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025614806194     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Dalenius T. 1977. Towards a methodology for statistical disclosure control. Statistisktidskrift 5: 429-444.
2. Duncan G.T. and Lambert D. 1986. Disclosure limited data dissemination. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81: 10-18.
3. Fuller W.A. 1993. Masking procedures for microdata disclosure limitation. Journal of Official Statistics 9: 383-406.
4. Franconi L. and Stander J. 2003. Spatial and non-spatial model-based protection procedures for the release of business micro data. Statistics and Computing 13: 295-305.
5. Polettini S. 2003. Maximum entropy simulation for microdata protection. Statistics and Computing 13: 307-320.
6. Sarathy R., Muralidhar K., and Parsa R. 2002. Perturbing non-normal confidential variables: The Copula approach. Management Science 48: 1613-1627.
7. Trottini M. and Fienberg S.E. 2002. Modeling user uncertainty for disclosure risk and data utility. International Journal of Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 10: 511-517.