On the equivalence between MFD models and pseudo-observable forms of MIMO systems

Computers and Electrical Engineering

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 295-314

  Bingulac, Stanoje ^a   Al Muthairi, Naser F ^a  

^a KUWAIT UNIVERSITY   (Kuwait)

Author keywords

Algorithm; Matrix fraction description; MIMO linear systems; State space

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346131935     PISSN: 00457906     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7906(98)00010-X     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kailath T. Linear systems. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
2. Chen CT. Linear system theory and design. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1984.
3. Bingulac S, VanLandingham HF. Algorithms for computer-aided design of multivariable control systems. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1993.
4. Ljung L. System identification: theory for the user. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1987.
5. Sinha NK, Kuszta B. Modeling and identification of dynamic systems. New York: Van Nostrand, 1983.
6. Al-Muthairi N, Bingulac S, Al-Mazeedi MM. On the identification of MFD from input/output samples of MIMO systems. Proc 13th IFAC Triennal World Congress, San Francisco, Paper 3a-11-5, 1, 1996. pp. 345-350.
7. Luenberger DG. Canonical forms for linear multivariable systems. IEEE Trans Autom Contr 1967;12:290-3.
8. Chen CT. Techniques for identification of linear time-invariant multivariable systems. In: Leondes LC (Ed), Control and dynamic systems. New York: Academic Press, 1987. pp. 1-34.
9. Gevers M, Wertz V. Uniquely identifiable state space and ARMA parametrizations for multivariable linear systems. Automatica 1984;20:333-47.
10. Corea G, Glover K. On the choice of parametrisation for identification. IEEE Trans Autom Contr 1986;31:8-15.
11. Bingulac S, Krtolica R. On admissibility of pseudo-observability and pseudo-controllability indices. IEEE Trans Autom Contr 1987;32:920-2.
12. Ljung L. A simple start-up procedure for canonical form state space identification, based on subspace approximation. Proc 30th CDC, Brighton, 1991. pp. 1333-1336.
13. Veberg M. Subspace methods in system identification. Proc IFAC Symp on System Identification, Copenhagen, 1994. pp. 1-12.
14. Bingulac S, Gorti BM, VanLandingham HF. Computational simplification of ERA (Eigensystem Realization Algorithm). Arab J Sci Eng Saudi Arabia 1993;18:557-66.
15. Bingulac S, VanLandingham HF. Algorithms for discretization and continualization of MIMO state space representations. In: Leondes LC (Ed.), Control and dynamic systems, vol. 70. New York: Academic Press, 1995. pp. 113-161.
16. Bingulac S, Al-Muthairi N. A Version of the subspace model identification procedure. Proc. of the IASTED International Conference, Control '97, Cancun, Mexico, 1997. pp. 215-218.
17. Gorti BM, Bingulac S, VanLandingham HF. Deterministic identification of linear multivariable systems. Proc. 22nd Southeastern Symposium on System Theory, Cookeville, Tennessee, 1990. pp. 126-131.
18. Antoulas C. On recursiveness and related topics in linear systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1986;31:1121-35.
19. Al-Muthairi NF, Bingulac S. On coprime factorization and minimal realization of transfer function matrices using pseudo-observability concept. Int J Systems Science 1994;25:1819-44.
20. Verhaegen M, Dewilde P. Subspace model identification. Part 1: the output-error state space model identification class of algorithms. Int J Control 1992;56:1187-210.
21. th Triennal World Congress, San Francisco, vol. 1, 1996. pp. 181-186.