Total Synthesis of α-Ketol Derivative of Linolenic Acid (KODA), a Flower-inducing Factor in Lemna paucicostata

Chemistry Letters

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 844-845

  Yokokawa, Yoshihiro ^a   Kobayashi, Kouji ^a   Yokoyama, Mineyuki ^a   Yamamura, Shosuke ^b  

^a SHISEIDO RESEARCH CENTER   (Japan)

^b KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLYL ALCOHOL; LINOLENIC ACID;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; ESTERIFICATION; FLOWER; SYNTHESIS;

EID: 0346120356     PISSN: 03667022     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1246/cl.2003.844     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. M. Yokoyama, S. Yamaguchi, S. Inomata, K. Komatsu, S. Yoshida, T. Iida, Y. Yokokawa, M. Yamaguchi, S. Kaihara, and A. Takimoto, Plant Cell Physiol., 41, 110 (2000).
2. S. Yamaguchi, M. Yokoyama, T. Iida, M. Okai, O. Tanaka, and A. Takimoto, Plant Cell Physiol., 42, 1201 (2001).
3. M. Suzuki, S. Yamaguchi, T. Iida, I. Hashimoto, H. Teranishi, M. Mizoguchi, F. Yano, Y. Todoroki, N. Watanabe, and M. Yokoyama, Plant Cell Physiol., 44, 35 (2003).
4. T. Itoh, K. Sakabe, and K. Kudo, Tetrahedron Lett., 39, 4071 (1998).
5. All new compounds were characterized by physicochemical properties. The structures of the compounds (7, 8, 10, 11) were supported by their spectral data, even though they were diastereomeric mixtures.
6. Z.-B. Zhang, Z.-M. Wang, Y.-X. Wang, H.-Q. Liu, G.-X. Lei, and M. Shi, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 10, 837 (1999).
7. 1,4-Heptadiyne was prepared by a literature method: S. Voerman and G. H. L. Rothschild, J. Chem. Ecol., 4, 531 (1978).
8. 3) δ: 0.03(3H, s), 0.04(3H, s), 0.91(9H, s), 0.95(3H, t, J = 7.5 Hz), 1.26-1.56(12H), 2.04(2H, m), 2.27(2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz), 2.74(2H, t, J = 6.0Hz), 3.34(2H, dd, J = 5.0, 7.0Hz), 3.64(3H, s), 4.03(1H, dd, 7 = 5.5, 7.5Hz), 5.28(1H, m), 5.38(1H, m), 5.56(2H, m).
9. 3OD) δ: 0.97(3H, t, J = 7.5Hz), 1.28-1.71(12H), 2.08(2H, m), 2.26(2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz), 2.79(2H, m), 3.35(2H, t, J = 5.0Hz), 4.10 (1H, m), 5.29 (1H, m), 5.40 (1H, m), 5.54 (2H, m).
10. Each reaction condition has not been optimized.
11. 3) δ: 1.27-1.57 (12H), 2.26 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz), 3.62 (3H, s), 4.04 (1H, m), 5.05 (1H, d, J = 10.0 Hz), 5.17 (1H, dd, J = 1.5, 10.0 Hz), 5.82 (1H, m).
12. I. Ohtani, T. Kusumi, Y. Kashman, and H. Kakisawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113, 4092 (1991).
13. 1H NMR data were identical to those of 1.
14. S. Imamura and A. Takimoto, Bot. Mag., Tokyo, 68, 235 (1955).
15. The detailed activity will be presented elsewhere.