Phonetic markers of global discourse structures in English

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 466-493

  Herman, Rebecca ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346056195     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jpho.2000.0127     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Beckman, M. E. Ayers, G. M. 1994, Guidelines for ToBI labelling, The Ohio State University, http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/phonetics/E_ToBI.
2. Beckman M. E., Edwards J., Fletcher J. Prosodic structure and tempo in a sonority model of articulatory dynamics. Docherty G. J., Ladd D. R. Papers in laboratory phonology II: gesture, segment, prosody. 1992;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Beckman M. E., Pierrehumbert J. B. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook. 3:1986;255-309.
4. Boyce S., Menn L. Peaks vary, endpoints don't: implications for intonation theory. Proceedings of the 5th annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society. 1979.
5. Cruttenden A. Intonation. 1986;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
6. Dilley L., Shattuck-Hufnagel S., Ostendorf M. Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure. Journal of Phonetics. 24:1996;423-444.
7. Grosz B., Hirschberg J. Some intonational characteristics of discourse structure. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on spoken language processing. 1992;. p. 429-432.
8. Grosz B. J., Sidner C. L. Attentions, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics. 12:1986;175-204.
9. Halliday M. A. K. Intonation and grammar in British English. 1967;Mouton, The Hague.
10. Herman R., Beckman M., Honda K. Subglottal pressure and final lowering in English. Bunnell H. T., Idsardi W. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on spoken language processing. 1996;145-148.
11. Herman R., McGory J. T. Mapping intonational transcribers' tone similarity spaces. Proceedings of the 14th international congress of phonetic sciences. 1999;. p. 2331-2334.
12. Hirschberg, J. Nakatani, C. H. 1996, A prosodic analysis of discourse segments in direction-giving monologues, 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics at the University of California, Santa Cruz. http://www.research.att.com./~julia.
13. Hirschberg J., Pierrehumbert J. The intonational structuring of discourse. Proceedings of the 24th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics. 1986;. p. 136-144.
14. Kingon R. The groundwork of English intonation. 1958;Longman, London.
15. Kreiman J. Perception of sentence and paragraph boundaries in natural conversation. Journal of Phonetics. 10:1982;163-175.
16. Ladd D. R. Intonational phonology. 1996;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
17. Ladd D. R., Terken J. Modelling intra- and inter-speaker pitch range variation. Elenius K., Branderud P. Proceedings of the international conference of phonetic sciences. 2:1995;386-389.
18. Lehiste I. Perception of sentences and paragraph boundaries. Lindblom B., Ohman S. Frontiers of speech communication research. 1979;Academic Press, London.
19. Lehiste I. The phonetic structure of paragraphs. Cohen A., Nooteboom S. G. Structure and process in speech perception. 1975;Springer-Verlag, New York.
20. Lehiste I., Wang W. S.-Y. Perception of sentence boundaries with and without semantic information. Dressler W. U., Pfeidder O. E. Phonologica 1976: Akten der dritten Internationalen Phonologie-Tagung Wien, 1-4 September 1976. 1977;277-283 Institut fur Sprachwissenschaft der Univ. Innsbruck, Innsbruck.
21. Liberman M., Pierrehumbert J. Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. Aronoff M., Oerhle R. Language sound structure. 1984;MIT Press, Cambridge.
22. Maeda S. A characterization of American English intonation. 1976;MIT.
23. Nakatani C. Discourse structural constraints on accent in narrative. van Santen J. P. H., Sproat R. W., Olive J. P., Hirschberg J. Progress in Speech Synthesis. 1997;Springer, New York.
24. Nakatani, C. H. Grosz, B. J. Ahn, D. D. Hirschberg, J. 1995, Instructions for annotating discourses, Technical Report Number TR-21-95. Center for Research in Computing Technology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
25. O'Connor J. D., Arnold G. F. Intonation of colloquial English. 1963;Longman, London.
26. Palmer H. English intonation, with systematic exercises. 1922;Heffer, Cambridge.
27. Partee B. H., ter Meulen A., Wall R. E. Mathematical methods in linguistics. 1990;Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
28. Pierrehumbert J. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. 1980;MIT.
29. Pierrehumbert J., Hirschberg J. The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. Cohen P. R., Morgan J., Pollack M. E. Intentions in communication. 1990;MIT Press, Cambridge.
30. Pitrelli J. F., Beckman M. E., Hirschberg J. Evaluation of prosodic transcription labeling reliability in the ToBI framework. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference in spoken language processing. 1994;. p. 123-126.
31. Roberts C. The place of centering in a general theory of Anaphora resolution. Walker M. A., Joshi A. K., Prince . F. Centering theory in discourse. 1998;Clarendon Press, Oxford.
32. Taylor P., King S., Isard S., Wright H. Intonation and dialog context as constraints for speech recognition. Language and Speech. 41:1998;492-512.