Assessing the quality of negotiated proposals using the REMBRANDT system

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 120, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 162-173

  Van Den Honert, R C ^a,b   Lootsma, F A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Acceptability scores; Aggregation; Multiple issue conflicts; Negotiations; Pairwise comparisons; Reference levels; REMBRANDT system

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346055032     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00372-5     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Arbel, A., Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G., 1987. Nuclear balance and the parity index: The role of intangibles in decisions. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics SMC-17, 821-828.
2. Barzilai, J., Cook, W.D., Golani, B., 1987. Consistent weights for judgement matrices of the relative importance of alternatives. Operations Research Letters 6, 131-134.
3. Barzilai, J., Lootsma, F.A., 1997. Power relations and group aggregation in the multiplicative AHP and SMART. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 6, 155-165.
4. Bueno de Mesquita, B., 1994. Political forecasting: An expected utility method. In: Bueno de Mesquita, B., Stokman, F.N. (Eds.), European Community Decision Making: Models, Applications and Comparisons. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, pp. 71-104.
5. Fang, L., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M., 1993. Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Wiley, New York.
6. Ikle, F.C., 1964. How Nations Negotiate. Praeger, New York.
7. Jarke, M., Jelassi, M.T., Shakun, M.F., 1987. MEDIATOR: Towards a negotiation support system. In: Shakun M.F. (Ed.), Evolutionary Systems Design: Policy Making under Complexity and Group Decision Support. Holden-Day, Oakland, CA.
8. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A., 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47, 263-291.
9. Kersten, G.E., 1985. NEGO - Group decision support system. Information and Management 8, 237-246.
10. Lootsma, F. A., 1988. Numerical scaling of human judgement in pairwise-comparison methods for fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis. In: Mitra, G. (Ed.), Mathematical Models for Decision Support. Springer, Berlin, pp. 57-88.
11. Lootsma, F.A., 1989. Conflict resolution via pairwise comparison of concessions. European Journal of Operational Research 40, 109-116.
12. Lootsma, F.A., 1992. The REMBRANDT system for multi-criteria decision analysis via pairwise comparisons or direct rating. Report 92-05, Faculteit der Technische Wiskunde en Informatica, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
13. Lootsma, F.A., 1993. Scale sensitivity in the multiplicative AHP and SMART. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 2, 87-110.
14. Lootsma, F.A., 1997. Fuzzy Logic for Planning and Decision Making. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
15. Lootsma, F.A., Sluijs, J.M., Wang, S.Y., 1994. Pairwise comparison of concessions in negotiation processes. Group Decision and Negotiation 3, 121-131.
16. Olsen, D.L., Fliedner, G., Currie, K., 1995. Comparison of the REMBRANDT system with analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 82, 522-539.
17. Saaty, T.L., 1988. The negotiation and resolution of the conflict in South Africa: The AHP. ORiON 4, 3-25.
18. Stewart, T.J., 1989. A review of simple multiple criteria decision analytic procedures which are implementable on spreadsheet packages. ORiON 5, 24-51.
19. Stokman, F.N., Van Oosten, R., 1994. The exchange of voting positions: An object-oriented model of policy networks. In: Bueno de Mesquita, B., Stokman, F.N. (Eds.), European Community Decision Making: Models, Applications and Comparisons. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, pp. 105-127.
20. Walker, W.E., Abrahamse, A., Bolten, J., Kahan, J.P., Van de Riet, O., Kok, M., Den Braber, M., 1994. A policy analysis of Dutch river dike improvements: Trading off safety, cost, and environmental impacts. Operations Research 42, 823-836.
21. Wierzbicki, A.P., 1980. The use of reference objectives in multiobjective optimisation. In: Fandel, G., Gal, T. (Eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Theory and Application. Springer, Berlin, pp. 468-486.