An Evaluation of the General Deterrent Effect of Vehicle Impoundment on Suspended and Revoked Drivers in California

Journal of Safety Research

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 51-59

  De Young, David J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Crash rates; General deterrence; Suspended revoked drivers; Vehicle impoundment forfeiture

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346045425     PISSN: 00224375     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4375(00)00024-4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Beirness D.J., Simpson H.M., Mayhew D.R. Evaluation of administrative license suspension and vehicle impoundment programs in Manitoba. 1997;Traffic Injury Research Foundation of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
2. Campbell D.T., Stanley J.C. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. 1963;Rand McNally College Publishing Company, Chicago, IL.
3. Cook T.D., Campbell D.T. Quasi-experimentation. Design and analysis issues for field settings:1979;Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA.
4. Crosby I.B. Portland's asset forfeiture program. the effectiveness of vehicle seizure in reducing rearrest among "problem" drunk drivers:1995;Reed College Public Policy Workshop, Portland, OR.
5. DeYoung D.J. An evaluation of the effectiveness of alcohol treatment, driver license actions and jail terms in reducing drunk driving recidivism in California. Addiction. 92:1997;989-997.
6. DeYoung D.J. An evaluation of the specific deterrent effects of vehicle impoundment on suspended, revoked and unlicensed drivers in California. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 31(1):1999;45-53.
7. DeYoung D.J., Peck R.C., Helander C.J. Estimating the exposure and fatal crash rates of suspended/revoked and unlicensed drivers in California. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 29(1):1997;17-23.
8. Hagen R.E., McConnell E.J., Williams R.E. Suspension and revocation effects on the DUI offender. 1980;California Department of Motor Vehicles, Sacramento, CA.
9. Liu L.M., Hudak G.B. Forecasting and time series analysis using the SCA statistical system, Volume 1. 1992;Scientific Computing Associates Corporation, Oak Brook, IL.
10. McCleary R., Hay R.A. Applied time series analysis for the social sciences. 1982;Sage Publications, Inc, Beverly Hills, CA.
11. McDowall D., McCleary R., Meidinger E.E., Hay R.A. Interrupted time series analysis. 1980;Sage Publications, Inc, Beverly Hills, CA.
12. Injury facts. 1999;Author, Itasca, IL. [NSC].
13. Peck R.C. The general and specific deterrent effects of DUI sanctions. A review of California's experience Alcohol, Drugs and Driving. 7(1):1991;13-42.
14. Peck R.C., Healey E.J. California's negligent operator treatment program evaluation system, 1976-1995. 1995;California Department of Motor Vehicles, Sacramento, CA.
15. van Oldenbeek G., Coppin R.S. Driving under suspension and revocation. A study of suspended and revoked drivers classified as negligent operators:1965;California Department of Motor Vehicles, Sacramento, CA.
16. Voas R.B., Tippetts A.S., Taylor E. Temporary vehicle immobilization. Evaluation of a program in Ohio Accident Analysis & Prevention. 29(5):1997;635-642.
17. Voas R.B., Tippetts A.S., Taylor E. Temporary vehicle impoundment in Ohio. A replication and confirmation Accident Analysis & Prevention. 30(5):1998;651-655.
18. Wells-Parker E., Bangert-Drowns R., McMillen R., Williams M. Final results from a meta-analysis of remedial interventions with drink/drive offenders. Addiction. 90:1995;907-926.