Research and the Development of Educational Assessment

Oxford Review of Education

Volumn 26, Issue 3-4, 2000, Pages 407-419

  Black, Paul ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346043278     PISSN: 03054985     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713688540     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. AMES, C. (1992) Classrooms: goals, structures, and student motivation, Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 3, pp. 261-271.
2. ARCHENHOLD, W.F., BELL, J.F., DONNELLY, J., JOHNSON S. & WELFORD, G. (1988) Science at Age 15: a review of APU findings 1980-1984 (London, Her Majesty's Stationery Office).
3. ATKIN, J.M. & BLACK, P.J. (1997) Policy perils of international comparisons: the TIMSS case, Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 1, pp. 22-28.
4. BEATON, A.E. and five others (1996) Science Achievement in the Middle School Years: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Survey (Chestnut Hill MA, TIMSS-Boston College).
5. BECHER, B.A. (1990) Coaching for the scholastic aptitude test: further synthesis and appraisal, Review of Educational Research, 60, 3, pp. 373-417.
6. BERG, C.A. & SMITH, P. (1994) Assessing students' abilities to construct and interpret line graphs: disparities between multiple-choice and free-response instruments, Science Education, 78, 6, pp. 527-554.
7. BLACK, P.J. (1990) APU Science-the past and the future, School Science Review, 72, 258, pp. 13-28.
8. BLACK, P.J. (1993) Formative and summative assessment by teachers, Studies in Science Education, 21, pp. 49-97.
9. BLACK, P.J. (1997) Whatever happened to TGAT? in: C. Culingford (Ed.) Assessment vs. Evaluation (London, Cassell).
10. BLACK, P. & WILIAM, D. (1998a). Assessment and Classroom Learning, Assessment in Education, 5, 1, pp. 7-71.
11. BLACK, P.J. & WILIAM, D. (1998b) Inside the Black Box: raising standards through classroom assessment (London: School of Education, King's College). See also Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 2, pp. 139-148.
12. BLACK, P.J. & WILIAM, D. (1998b) Inside the Black Box: raising standards through classroom assessment (London: School of Education, King's College). See also Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 2, pp. 139-148.
13. BROADFOOT, P.M. (1996) Education, Assessment and Society: a sociological analysis (Buckingham UK, Open University Press).
14. BRUNER, J. (1996) The Culture of Education (Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press).
15. BUTLER, R. (1988) Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation; the effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, pp. 1-14.
16. CHRISTIE, T. & FORREST, G.M. (1980) Standards at GCE A-level 1963 and 1973 (London, Macmillan).
17. CRESSWELL, M.J. (1996) Defining, Setting and Maintaining Standards in Curriculum-embedded Examinations: Judgemental and Statistical Approaches, in: H. GOLDSTEIN & T. LEWIS (Eds) Assessment: Problems, Developments and Statistical Issues (Chichester and New York, John Wiley).
18. CROOKS, T.J. (1988) The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students, Review of Educational Research, 58, 4, pp. 438-481.
19. CROOKS, T.J. & FLOCKTON, L. (1996) Art Assessment Results 1995: National Education Monitoring Report 1 (see also Art: Report 2 and Graphs, Tables and Maps: Report 3) (Dunedin: University of Otago, Educational Assessment Research Unit).
20. CROOKS, T.J. & FLOCKTON, L. (1996) Art Assessment Results 1995: National Education Monitoring Report 1 (see also Art: Report 2 and Graphs, Tables and Maps: Report 3) (Dunedin: University of Otago, Educational Assessment Research Unit).
21. DES (1988) National Curriculum: Task Group on Assessment and Testing: a report (London, Department of Education and Science and Welsh Office).
22. DRIVER, R., SQUIRES, A., RUSHWORTH, P. & WOOD-ROBINSON, V. (1994) Making Sense of Secondary Science: research into children's ideas (London, Routledge).
23. FITZ-GIBBON, C.T. & VINCENT, L. (1995) Candidates' Performance in Public Examinations in Mathematics and Science (London, School Curriculum and Assessment Authority).
24. FUCHS, L.S. & FUCHS, D. (1986) Effects of systematic formative evaluation - a metaanalysis, Exceptional Children, 53, 3, pp. 199-208.
25. GARDNER, H. (1993) Multiple Intelligences: the theory in practice (New York, Basic Books).
26. GAULD, C.F. (1980) Subject oriented test construction, Research in Science Education, 10, pp. 77-82.
27. HACKER, D.J., DUNLOSKY, J. & GRAESSER, A.C. (Eds) (1998) Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice (Mahwah NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum).
28. HARGREAVES, D.H. (1998) Improving research to enhance teaching: a response to Michael Bassey, Professional Development Today.
29. HERR, N.E. (1992) A comparative analysis of the perceived influence of advanced placement and honors programs upon science instruction, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 5, pp. 521-532.
30. JOHNSON, S. (1988) National Assessment: the APU Science approach (London, HMSO).
31. JONES A., SIMON S.A., BLACK, P.J., FAIRBROTHER R.W. & WATSON, J.R. (1992) Open Work in School Science: development of investigations in schools (Hatfield, Association for Science Education).
32. LEMANN, N. (1999) The Big Test: the secret history of the American meritocracy (New York, Farrar Straus and Giroux).
33. LINN, R.L. (1994) Assessment Based Reform: Challenges to Educational Measurement (Princeton, N.J., Educational Testing Service).
34. LINN, R.L., GRAUE, E. & SANDERS, N.M. (1990) Comparing state and district test results to national norms: The validity of claims "That everyone is above average", Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9, 3, pp. 5-14.
35. LUNDEBERG, M.A. & Fox, P.W. (1991) Do laboratory findings on test expectancy generalise to classroom outcomes? Review of Educational Research, 61, 1, pp. 94-106.
36. MACLEOD, R. (Ed.) (1982) Days of Judgement: Science Examinations and the Organiza-tion of Knowledge in Late Victorian England (Driffield, Nafferton Books).
37. NATRIELLO, G. (1987) The impact of evaluation processes on students, Educational Psychologist, 22, 2, pp. 155-175.
38. PELLEGRINO, J.W., JONES, L.R. & MITCHELL, K. (1998) Grading the Nation's Report Card (Washington D.C., National Academy Press).
39. PELLEGRINO, J.W., BAXTER, G.P. & GLASER, R. (1999) Addressing the "Two Disciplines" problem: linking theories of cognition with assessment and instructional practice, Review of Research in Education, 24, pp. 303-353.
40. REESE, C.M. et al. (1997) 1996 NAEP Mathematics report Card for the Nation and the States (Washington D.C., National Center for Education Statistics).
41. ROGOFF, B. (1990) Apprenticeship in Thinking: cognitive development in social context (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
42. SADLER, R. (1989) Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems, Instructional Science, 18, pp. 119-144.
43. SCHMIDT, W.H., MCKNIGHT, C.C., COGAN, L.S., JAKWERTH P.M. & HOUANG, R.T. (1999) Facing the Consequences: using TIMSS for a closer look at U.S. mathematics and science education (Dordrecht and Boston, Kluwer Academic).
44. SHAVELSON, R.J., BAXTER, G.P. & GAO, X. (1993) Sampling variability of performance assessments, Journal of Educational Measurement, 30, 3, pp. 215-232.
45. SMITH, P.S., HOUNSHELL, P.B., COPOLO, C. & WILKERSON, S. (1992) The impact of end-of-course testing in chemistry on curriculum and instruction, Science Education, 76, 5, pp. 523-530.
46. STERNBERG, R.J. (1997) Thinking Styles (New York, Cambridge University Press).
47. STIGLER, J.W. & HIEBERT, J. (1997) Understanding and improving classroom mathematics instruction: an overview of the TIMSS video study, Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 1, pp. 14-21.
48. SUTHERLAND, G. (1996) Assessment: Some Historical Perspectives, in: H. GOLDSTEIN & T. LEWIS (Eds) Assessment: problems, developments and statistical issues (Chichester and New York, John Wiley).
49. TAMIR, P. (1990) Justifying the selection of answers in multiple choice items, International Journal of Science Education, 12, 5, pp. 563-573.
50. VYGOTSKY, L.S. (1962) Thought and Language (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press and Wiley).
51. WAINER, H. & BRAUN, H.I. (Eds.) (1998) Test Validity (Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum).
52. WENGER, E. (1998) Communities of Practice (New York NY, Cambridge University Press).
53. WILIAM, D. (1995) It'll all end in tiers, British Journal of Curriculum and Assessment, 5, 3, pp. 21-24.
54. WOLF, A. (1996) Vocational assessment, in: H. GOLDSTEIN & T. LEWIS (Eds) Assessment: problems, developments and statistical issues (Chichester and New York, John Wiley).
55. WOOD, D., BRUNER, J.S. & Ross, G. (1976) The role of tutoring in problem solving, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 17, pp. 89-100.
56. WOOD, T. (1988) State-mandated acountability as a constraint on teaching and learning science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 8, pp. 631-641.
57. WOOD, R. (1991) Assessment and Testing: a survey of research (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
58. YARROCH, W.L. (1991) The implications of content versus item validity on science tests, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 7, pp. 619-629.