An efficient algorithm for Kriging approximation and optimization with large-scale sampling data

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 193, Issue 3-5, 2004, Pages 385-404

  Sakata, S ^a   Ashida, F ^a   Zako, M ^b  

^a SHIMANE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Computational cost; Kriging estimation; Sherman Morrison Woodbury formula; Structural optimization

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; OPTIMIZATION; SAMPLING;

COMPUTATIONAL COST; KRIGING ESTIMATION;

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING;

ALGORITHM; SAMPLING;

EID: 0346038959     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2003.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. W.C. Carpenter, J.F.M. Barthelemy, A Comparison of polynomial Approximations and Artificial Neural Nets as Response Surfaces, A collection of technical papers: the 33rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, AIAA, Dallas, TX, April 13-15, 1992, pp. 2474-2482
2. E. Nikolaidis, L. Long, Q. Ling, Neural networks and response surface polynomials for design of vehicle joints, AIAA-98-1777, 1998, pp. 653-662
3. N. Papila, W. Shyy, N. Fitz-Coy, R.T. Haftka, Assessment of neural net and polynomial-based techniques for aerodynamic applications, in: AIAA 17th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA-99-3167, 1999
4. R. Jin, W. Chen, T.W. Simpson, Comparative studies of metamodeling techniques under multiple modeling criteria, in: 8th AIAA/NASA/USAF/ISSMO Symposium on Multi-disciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Long Beach, CA, AIAA, 2000, AIAA-2000-4801
5. Box G.E.P. Wilson K.B. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 13 1951 1-45
6. Kashiwamura T. Shiratori M. Yu Q. Statistical optimization method Comput. Aided Optimum Des. Struct. V 1997 213-227
7. I.P. Sobieski, V.M. Manning, I.M. Kroo, Response surface estimation and refinement in collaborative optimization, AIAA-98-4753, 1998, pp. 4753-4770
8. S. Hosder, L.T. Watson, B. Grossman, W.H. Mason, H. Kim, R.T. Haftka, S.E. Cox, Polynomial response surface approximations for the multidisciplinary design optimization of a high speed civil transport, Technical Reports of NCSTRL at Virginia Tech CS (TR-01-03), 2001
9. Barthelemy J.F.M. Haftka R.T. Approximation concepts for optimum structural design--a review Struct. Optim. 5 1993 129-144
10. Haftka R.T. Scott E.P. Optimization and Experiments--A Survey, Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 1996 1997 Elsevier Science
11. Q. Shi, I. Hagiwara, F. Takashima, The most probable optimal design method for global optimization, in: Proceedings of the 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences DETC/DAC-8635, Las Vegas, Nevada, September, 1999, pp. 12-15
12. Berke L. Hajela P. Application of artificial neural nets in structural mechanics Struct. Optim. 4 1992 90-98
13. Hagiwara I. Shi Q. Kozukue W. Development of non-linear dynamic optimization method by using the holographic neural-network, 1st Report: Basic examination with a mass-spring model Trans. JSME Ser. A 63 616 1997 2510-2517
14. Hagiwara I. Shi Q. Takashima F. Function approximation method for crash optimization using neural network, 2nd Report: Application to vehicle component Trans. JSME Ser. A 64 626 1998 7-13
15. Sacks J. Welch W.J. Mitchell T.J. Wynn H.P. Design and analysis of computer experiments Statist. Sci. 4 4 1989 409-435
16. A. Giunta, L.T. Watson, J. Koehler, A Comparison of approximation modeling techniques: polynomial versus interpolating models, in: 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis - Optimization, St. Louis, MI, September 2-4, AIAA-98-4758-CP, 1998
17. Cappelleri D.J. Frecker M.I. Simpson T.W. Design of a PZT bimorph actuator using a metamodel-based approach J. Mech. Des. Trans. ASME 124 2002 354-357
18. Sakata S. Ashida F. Zako M. Optimization of laminated composites for eigenfrequency problem using K-CSSL method Chang F.-K. Proceedings of the Tenth US-Japan Conference on Composite Materials 2002 560-569 DEStech Publishers
19. T.W. Simpson, T.M. Mauery, J.J. Korte, F. Mistree, Comparison of Response Surface and Kriging Models for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization, 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis - Optimization, St. Louis, MI, September 2-4, AIAA-98-4755, 1998
20. Sakata S. Ashida F. Zako M. Structural optimization using Kriging approximation Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 192 7-8 2003 923-939
21. Cressie N. The origins of kriging Math. Geol 22 3 1990 239-252
22. Mase S. Takeda J. Spatial Data Modeling 2001 Kyoritsu Shuppan Co. Ltd.
23. Cressie N. Fitting variogram models by weighted least squares Math. Geol. 17 5 1985 563-586
24. Golub G.H. Van loan C.F. Matrix Computations third ed. 1996 The Johns Hopkins University Press
25. R.M. Brunell, B.M. Squibb, An automatic variogram fitting procedure using Cressie's criterion, in: ASA Proceedings of the Section on Statistics and Environment, 1993, pp. 135-137
26. E. Cuthill, J. Mckee, Reducing the bandwidth of sparse symmetric matrices, in: Proceedings of ACM National Conference, Association for Computing Machinery, 1969, pp. 157-172
27. Gibbs N.E. Poole W.G. Stockmeyer P.k. An algorithm for reducing the bandwidth and profile of a sparse matrix SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 13 2 1976 236-250
28. Sakata S. Ashida F. Zako M. Applications of CSSL method to multi-peaked structural optimization problem Theor. Appl. Mech. 51 2002 335-341