Shock-Vortex Interactions at High Mach Numbers

Journal of Scientific Computing

Volumn 19, Issue 1-3, 2003, Pages 347-371

  Rault, Audrey ^a   Chiavassa, Guillaume ^a   Donat, Rosa ^b  

^a Ecole Centrale Marseille   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Composite vortex; Shock capturing schemes; Shock deformation

Indexed keywords

COMPOSITE VORTEX; MACH NUMBER; MULTILEVEL WORK-REDUCTION TECHNIQUE; PIECE HYBERBOLIC METHOD; SHOCK CAPTURING SCHEMES; SHOCK DEFORMATION;

ACOUSTIC NOISE; COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; DATA REDUCTION; MISSILES; NUMERICAL METHODS; SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFT; VORTEX FLOW;

SHOCK WAVES;

EID: 0346009118     PISSN: 08857474     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025316311633     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Chatterjee, A. (1999). Shock wave deformation in shock-vortex interactions. Shock Waves 9, 95-105.
2. Arandiga, F., Chiavassa, G., and Donat, R. (2001). Application of Harten's Framework From Conservation Laws to Image Compression, Springer Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, Vol. 20, p. 281.
3. Cai, W., and Shu, C. W. (1993). Uniform high-order spectral methods for one and two dimensional Euler equations. J. Comp. Phys. 104, 427-443.
4. Chiavassa, G., and Donat, R. (2001). Point value multiscale algorithm for 2D compressible flows. SIAM J. Sci. Comp. 23(3), 805-823.
5. Chiavassa, G., Donat, R., and Marquina, A. (2001). Fine-mesh simulations for 2D Riemann problems with multilevel schemes. International Series of Numerical Mathematics, Vol. 140.
6. Chiavassa, G., Donat, R., and Marquina, A. (2000). A wavelet algorithm for 2D conservation laws. Proceedings of Conference R. Temam, Equations aux derivées partielles non-linéaires: Applications à la mécanique des fluides et à la météorologie, Poitiers.
7. Don, W. S. (1993). Numerical study of pseudospectral methods in shock waves applications. J. Comp. Phys. 104.
8. Donat, R., Font, J. A., Ibànez, J. M., and Marquina, A. (1998). A flux-split algorithm applied to relativistio flows. J. Comput. Phys. 146, 58-41.
9. Donat, R., and Marquina, A. (1996). Capturing shock reflections: An improved flux formula. J. Comp. Phys. 125, 42.
10. Donat, R., and Marquina, A. (1999). Computing strong shocks in ultrarelativistic flows: A robust alternative. International Series of Numerical Mathematics, Vol. 129.
11. Dosanjh, D. S., and Weeks, T. M. (1965). Interaction of a starting vortex as well as a vortex street with a traveling shock wave. AIAA J. 3, 216-223.
12. Einfeldt, B., Munz, C. D., Roe, P. L., and Sjörgreen, B. (1991). On godunov-type methods near low densities. J. Comp. Phys., 92, 273-295.
13. Ellzey, J. L., Henneke, M. R., Picone, J. M., and Oran, E. S. (1995). The interaction of a shock with a vortex: Shock distortion and the production of acoustic waves. Phys. Fluids 7, 172-184.
14. Erlebacher, G., Hussaini, M. Y., and Jackson, T. L. (1998). Nonlinear strong shock interactions: A shock fitted approach. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dynamics 11, 1-29.
15. Erlebacher, G., Hussaini, M. Y., and Shu, C. W. (1997). Interaction of a shock with a longitudinal vortex. J. Fluid Mechanics 337, 129-153.
16. Fürst, J. (2001). Modélisation numérique d'écoulements transsoniques avec des schémas TVD et ENO, Ph.D. thesis, University of Aix-Marseille and of Praha.
17. Fürst, J., Angot, P., Debieve, J. F., and Kozel, K. (1997). Two and three-dimensional applications of TVD and ENO schemes, Numerical Modelling in Continuum Mechanics, 3rd Summer Conf. in Praha, MATFIZPRESS Charles Univ., Vol. 1, pp. 103-111.
18. Fedkiw, R., Merriman, B., Donat, R., and Osher, S. (1997). The penultimate scheme for systems of conservation laws: Finite difference ENO with Marquina's flux splitting. In Hafez, M. M., and Chattot, J. J. (eds.), Innovative Methods for Numerical Solutions of PDEs, pp. 49-85.
19. Grasso, F., and Pirozzoli, S. (2000). Shock-wave-vortex interactions: Shock and vortex deformations and sound production. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dynamics 13, 421-456.
20. Inoue, O., and Hattori, Y. (1999). Sound generation by shock-vortex interactions. J. Fluid Mech. 380, 81-116.
21. Jiang, G. S., and Shu, C. W. (1996). Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 126, 202-228.
22. Kevlahan, N. K.-R. (1997). The vorticity jump across a shock in a non-uniform flow. J. Fluid Mech. 341, 371-384.
23. Marquina, A., and Mulet, P. A flux-split algorithm applied to conservative models for multicomponent compressible flows. To appear in J. Comput. Phys.
24. Marquina, A. (1994). Local piecewise hyperbolic reconstruction of numerical fluxes for nonlinear scalar conservation laws. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 15, 892-915.
25. Meadows, K. R., Kumar, A., and Hussaini, M. Y. (1991). Computational study on the interaction between a vortex and a shock wave, AIAA J. 29(2), 174-179.
26. Naumann, A., and Hermanns, E. (1973). On the interaction between a shock wave and a vortex field. AGARD CP 131.
27. Pao, S. P., and Salas, M. D. (1981). A Numerical Study of Two-Dimensional Shock-Vortex Interaction, AIAA paper AIAA-81-1205. 14th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference.
28. Picone, J. M., and Boris, J. P. (1988). Vorticity generation by shock propagation through bubbles in a gas. J. Fluid Mech. 189, 23-51.
29. Ribner, H. S. (1985). Cylindrical sound waves generated by shock-vortex interaction. AIAA J. 23(11), 1708-1715.
30. Samtaney, R., and Zabusky, N. J. (1994). Circulation deposition on shock-accelerated planar and curved density-stratified interfaces: Models and scaling laws. J. Fluid Mech. 269, 45-78.
31. Shu, C. W., and Osher, S. J. (1989). Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes II. J. Comp. Phys. 83, 32-78.
32. Smart, M. K., Kalkhoran, I. M., and Popovic, S. (1998). Some aspects of streamwise vortex behavior during oblique shock wave/vortex interaction. Shock Waves 8, 243-255.
33. Toro, E. F. (1999). Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer-Verlag.