Detection of differential item functioning in a science test;Detección del funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems en una prueba de ciencias

Psicothema

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 691-697

  Marañón, Pedro Prieto ^a   García, M Isabel Barbero ^b   Costas, Concepción San Luis ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345978287     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ackerman, T.A. (1988) An explanation of differential item functioning from a multidimensional perspective. comunicacion presentada en la reunion anual de American Educational research Association, New Orleans.
2. Ackerman, T.A. (1992). A didactic explanation of item bias, item impact, and item validity from a multidimensioanl perspective. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29(1), 67-91.
3. Ackerman, T.A. (1993). Differential item functioning as a function od the valid subtest space. Comunicacion presentada en la reunion de la European Psychometric Society. Barcelona.
4. Angoff, W.H. (1982). Use of difficulty and dsicrimination indices for detecting item bias. In R.A. Berk (Ed.), Handbook of methods for detecting test bias (pp 96-116). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
5. Camilli, G., & Shepard, L.A. (1994). Methods for Identifying Biased Test Items. London: Sage Pub.
6. Cole, N.S. & Moss, P.A. (1989). Bias in Test Use. In R.L. Linn (Ed.) Educational Measurement (3rd de., pp. 201-219). New York: McMillan.
7. Fidalgo, A.M. (1996). Funcionamiento Diferencial de los Items. Procedimiento Mantel-Haenszel y modelos loglineales. Tesis Doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Oviedo.
8. Fidalgo, A.M. (1996b). Funcionamiento Diferencial de los Items. En J. Muñiz (Coord.), Psicometría (pp. 370-455). Madrid: Universitas.
9. Fidalgo, A.M., Mellenbergh, G.J. y Muñiz, J. (1998). Comparación del procedimiento Mantel-Haenszel frente a los modelos loglineales en la detección del funcionamiento diferencial de los items. Psicothema, 10(1), 209-218
10. Holland, P.W., & Thayer, D.T. (1988). Diffrential item performance and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. In Wainer, H. & Braun, H.I. (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 129-145). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Jensen, A.R. (1980). Bias in Mental Testing. New York. Free Press.
12. Linn, R.L., & Harsnich, D.L. (1981). Interactions between item content and group membreship on achievement test items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 18, 109-118.
13. Mazor, K.M., Clauser, B.E., & Hambleton, R.K. (1994). Identification of non-uniform differential item functioning using a variation of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(2), 284-291.
14. Mellenbergh, G.J. (1982). Contingency table models for assesing item bias. Journal of Educational Statistic, 7, 105-107.
15. Muñiz, J. (1990): Teoría de Respuestas a los Items: Un nuevo enfoque en la evaluación psicológica y educativa.. Pirámide. Madrid.
16. Oort, F.J. (1992). Using restricted factor analysis to detect item bias. Methodika, 6, 150-166.
17. Oort, F.J. (1993). Theory of violators: Assessing unidimensionality of psychological measures. En R. Steyer, K.F. Wender y K.F. Widaman (Eds.): Psychometric methodology. Proceedinngs of the 7th European Meeting of the Psychometric Society in Trier. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
18. Prieto, P., Barbero, M.I., & San Luis, C. (1997). Identification of nonuniform DIF: A comparison of Mantel-Haenszel and IRT analysis procedure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 4: 559-568
19. San Luis, C., Prieto, P., Barbero, M., & Sánchez, J.A. (1995). GENESTE: Un programa de control para TRI. Psicológica, 16, 297-304.
20. Shealy, R. & Stout, W. (1993). An item response theory model for test bias and differential test functioning. En W.P. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds.). Differential Item Functioning. (pp. 197-240). Hillsdale, NJ:LEA.
21. Wright, B.D., & Panchapakesan, N. (1969). A procedure for samplefree item analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29, 23-48.