The study of religion: Neutral, scientific, or neither?

Method and Theory in the Study of Religion

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 339-351

  Byrne, Peter ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345938033     PISSN: 09433058     EISSN: 15700682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/157006897X00322     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Clarke Peter B. - Peter Byrne (1993). Religion Defined and Explained London-Basingstoke: Macmillan
2. Crick, Malcolm (1976). Explorations in Language and Meaning: Toward a Semantic Anthropology. London: Malaby Press
3. Donovaneter (1990). Neutrality in religious studies. Religious Studies 26: 103-116
4. Geertz, Clifford (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. London Hutchinson
5. Gellner, Ernest (1973). Cause and Meaning in the Social Sciences. London Routledge & Kegan Paul
6. Kitcherhilip (1982). Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
7. Morris, Brian (1987). Anthropological Studies of Religion: An Introductory Text. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
8. Preus, J. Samuel (1987). Explaining Religion: Criticism and Theory from Bodin to Freud. New Haven: Yale University Press
9. Wiebe, Donald (1981). Religion and Truth: Towards an Alternative Paradigm Religion in the Study of Religion. The Hague: Mouton
10. - (1985). A positive episteme for the study of religion. Scottish Journal of Religious Studies 6: 78-95
11. - (1994). Beyond Legitimation: Essays on the Problem of Religious Knowledge. London-Basingstoke: Macmillan
12. Wincheter (1958). The Idea of a Social Science and its Relations to Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul