The TRIPs agreement and information technologies: Implications for developing countries

Information and Communications Technology Law

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 133-147

  Correa, Carlos M ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345936727     PISSN: 13600834     EISSN: 14698404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13600834.1996.9965740     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aita, Y., 1993. Patentability of computer software related inventions in Japan. Patents & Licensing, December
2. Betten, J., 1992. New decisions of the German Federal Supreme Court concerning patent protection of computer programs. Patents & Licensing, April
3. Correa, C., 1990a. The legal protection of software. Implications for latecomer strategies in newly industrializing countries (NICs) and middle-income countries (MICs). Informatica e Diritto, XVI January-April
4. Correa, C., 1990b. Intellectual property in the field of integrated circuits: implications for developing countries. World Competition, 14
5. Correa, C., 1990c. Legal protection of the layout designs of integrated circuits: the WIPO Treaty. European Intellectual Property Review, 12
6. Correa, C., 1990d. Software industry: an opportunity for Latin America?. World Development, 18: 196–203.
7. Correa, C., 1993. Legal protection and innovation in the software industry. World Competition, 17
8. Correa, M., 1995. Strategies for software exports from developing countries. World Development, 24: 171–182.
9. EC Commission. 1988. Green Paper on Copyright and the Challenge of Technology - Copyright Issues Requiring Immediate Action, Brussels: ECC.
10. Evans, A., 1992. Legal protection of databases. Copyright World, 24
11. Fortune, (1994) Competitiveness. How US companies stack up now (18 April)
12. Karjala, D., 1994. Recent United States and international development in software protection. European Intellectual Property Review, 1 and 2: 58–66.
13. Laurie, R. S., Legal protection of integrated circuits designs in the United States. paper submitted to WIPO World Forum on Intellectual Property. 1988, Geneva.
14. Levin, R., Klovorick, A., Nelson, R., and Winter, S., 1987. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 3
15. OTA. 1986. Intellectual Property Rights in an Age of Electronics and Informatics, Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment.
16. OTA. 1992. Finding a Balance: computer software, intellectual property and the challenge of technological change, Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment.
17. Peterson, G., and Makay, C., 1992. The US software rental amendments Act. Copyright World, 22 May-June
18. Samuelson, P., Davis, R., Kapor, M., and Reichman, J., 1994. A manifesto concerning the legal protection of computer programs. Columbia Law Review, 94
19. Schware, R., 1992. Software industry entry strategies for developing countries: a “walking on two legs” proposition. World Development, 20
20. Siegel, D., and Laurie, R., 1989. Beyond microcode: Alloy v. Ultratek. The first attempt to extend copyright protection to computer hardware. The Computer Lawyer, 6
21. Vinje, T., 1991. The development of interoperable products under the EC Software Directive. The Computer Lawyer, 8
22. Stewart, T., ed. 1993. The CATT Uruguay Round. A Negotiating History, Vol. II, Deventer-Boston: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers.
23. von Lewinski, S., 1991. Rental right, lending right and certain neighbouring rights: the EC Commission's proposal for Council Directive. European Intellectual Property Review, 4: 117–123.