Improving the ability to detect comprehension problems: From revising to writing

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 143-166

  Lumbelli, Lucia ^a   Paoletti, Gisella ^a   Frausin, Tiziana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345917601     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00041-3     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Baker L. Comprehension monitoring: Identifying and copying with text confusions. Journal of Reading Behavior. 11:1979;363-374.
2. Baker L. Spontaneous versus instructed use of multiple standards for evaluating comprehension: Effects of age, reading proficiency and type of standard. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 38:1984;289-311.
3. Baker, L. (1985). How do we know when we don't understand? Standards for evaluating text comprehension. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. Mackinnon & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition and human performance (pp. 155-205). Orlando: Academic Press.
4. Baker L., Anderson R. J. Effects of inconsistent information on text processing: Evidence for comprehension monitoring. Reading Research Quarterly. 17:1982;281-294.
5. Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behaviour modification. New York: Holt-Rinchart-Winston.
6. Bartlett, E. J. (1982). Learning to revise: Some component processes. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: The language, process, and the structure of written discourse (pp. 345-363). New York: Academic Press.
7. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Bonk C. I. A synthesis of social cognition and writing research. Written Communication. 7:1990;136-163.
9. Bransford, J. D. (1979). Human cognition, learning, understanding. Belmont, CA: Wadesworth.
10. Bransford J. D., Johnson M. K. Contextual prerequisite for understanding: some investigations on comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 11:1972;717-726.
11. Chase W. G., Simon H. A. Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology. 4:1973;55-81.
12. Chiesi H. L., Spilich G. J., Voss J. F. Acquisition of domain-related inormation in relation to high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 46:1979;598-602.
13. Clark, H. H. (1977). Inferences in comprehension. In D. Laberge and S. J. Samuels (Eds), Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 243-263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Cornoldi, C., Colpo, G., & il gruppo MT (1981). La verifica dell'apprendimento della lettura. Prove MT di lettura [English]. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali (O.S.).
15. Couzijn, M. (1998) Learning to write argumentative text by observation of writing and reading processes; Effects on learning and transfer. Learning and Instruction, 3.
16. Couzijn, M., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1996). Learning to read and write argumentative text by observation. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Berg & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Effective teaching and learning of writing. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
17. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
18. Flower L. Writer-based prose. A cognitive basis for problems in writing. College English. 41:1979;19-37.
19. Flower L., Hayes J. R., Carey L., Schriver K. A., Stratman J. Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication. 37:1986;16-55.
20. Glenberg A. M., Meyer M., Linden K. Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language. 26:1987;69-83.
21. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
22. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Kroll B. M. Cognitive egocentrism and the problem of audience awareness in written discourse. Research in the Teaching of English. 12:1978;269-281.
24. Lumbelli, L. (1996). Focusing on text comprehension as a problem-solving task. A fostering project for culturally deprived children. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: processes and intervention (pp. 301-330). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Lumbelli, L., & Camagni, C. (1993). Can comprehensibility in writing be improved by revising oral language? In G. Eigler and Th. Jechle (Eds.), Writing. Current trends in European research (pp. 197-213). Freiburg: Hochschulverlag.
26. Lumbelli, L., Paoletti, G., Camagni, C., & Frausin, T. (1996). Can the ability to monitor local coherence in text comprehension be transferred to writing?. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van der Bergh, M. Couzijn (Eds.), Effective teaching and learning of writing (pp. 207-223). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
27. Markman E. M. Realizing that you don't understand. A preliminary investigation. Child Development. 46:1977;986-992.
28. Markman E. M. Realizing that you don't understand: Elementary school children's a awareness of inconsistencies. Child Development. 50:1979;643-655.
29. Osherson D., Markman E. Language and the ability to evaluate contradictions and tautologies. Cognition. 3:1975;213-226.
30. Piaget, J. (1926). The language and the thought of the child. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
31. Raven, J. C. (1938). Progressive matrices. I series. London: Lewis & Co.
32. Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Understanding and summarizing brief stories. In D. La Berge and S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 265-303). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Roth R. G. The evolving audience: Alternatives to audience accomodation. College Composition and Communication. 38:1987;47-55.
34. Schank, R. C. (1982). Reading and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Schank, R. C. & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Schriver, K. A. (1991). Plain language through protocol-aided revision. In E. R. Steinberg (Ed.), Plain language: Principles and practice (pp. 148-172). Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
37. Schriver K. A. Teaching writers to anticipate readers' needs. Written Communication. 9:1992;179-208.
38. Spiro, R. J. (1977). Remembering information from text: the "state of schema" approach. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 137-173). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Spiro R. J. Prior knowledge and story processing: integration, selection and variation. Poetics. 9:1980;313-327.
40. Witte S. P. Pre-text and composing. College Composition and Communication. 38:1987;347-425.