Perceptual grouping and motion coherence in visual search

Psychological Science

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 151-156

  Kingstone, Allan ^a   Bischof, W F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345914767     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00123     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aks, D.J., & Enns. J.T. (1996). Visual search for size is influenced by a background texture gradient. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1467-1481.
2. Andersen, G.J. (1989). Perception of three-dimensional structure from optic flow without locally smooth velocity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 363-371.
3. Cave, K.R., & Wolfe, J.M. (1990). Modelling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 255-271.
4. Driver, J., McLeod, P., & Dienes, Z. (1992). Motion coherence and conjunction search: Implications for guided search theory. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 79-85.
5. Duncan, J. (1995). Target and nontarget grouping in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 117-120.
6. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G.W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
7. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G.W. (1992). Beyond the search surface: Visual search and attentional engagement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 578-588.
8. Enns, J.T., & Rensink, R.A. (1990). Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. Science, 247, 721-723.
9. Finley, G. (1985). A high-speed point plotter for vision research. Vision Research, 25, 1993-1997.
10. He, Z.J., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Perceiving textures: Beyond filtering. Vision Research, 34, 151-162.
11. McLeod, P., Driver, J., & Crisp, J. (1988). Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel. Nature. 332, 154-155.
12. Nakayama, K., & Silverman, G. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature, 320, 264-265.
13. Qian, N., Andersen, R.A., & Adelson, E.H. (1994). Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. I. Psychophysics, The Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 7357-7366.
14. Ramachandran, V.S. (1988). Perceiving shape from shading. Scientific American, 259, 76-83.
15. Treisman, A. (1986). Features and objects in visual processing. Scientific American, 255, 106-115.
16. Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
17. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
18. Treisman, A., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459-478.
19. Trick, L.M., & Enns, J.T. (1997). Clusters precede shapes in perceptual organization. Psychological Science, 8, 124-129.
20. Ullman, S. (1979). The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
21. Watson, D.O., & Humphreys, G.W. (in press). Segmentation on the basis of linear and local rotational motion: Motion grouping in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
22. Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur lehre von der Gestalt, II. Psychologische Forschung, 4, 301-350.
23. Wolfe, J.M., Cave, K.R., & Franzel, S.L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 15, 419-433.