Politics of Science Education Standards

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 97, Issue 4, 1996, Pages

  Kirst, Michael W ^a   Anhalt, Bari ^a   Marine, Robert ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345911457     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: AAAS.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Washington, DC: AAAS.
3. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1994). Project 2061: Science literacy for a changing future. Washington, DC: AAAS.
4. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1995). Project 2061: A decade of reform. Washington, DC: AAAS.
5. Ball D. L. (1992). Implementing the NCTM standards. East Lansing: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teaching.
6. Brockett, D. (1993). Outcome-based education faces strong opposition. School Board News, 13(10), 1-6.
7. Cuban, L. (1979). Determinants of curriculum. In J. Schaffarzick (Ed.), Value conflicts and curriculum issues (pp. 139-196). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
8. Elmore, R., & Fuhrman, S. (1994). The governance of the curriculum. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
9. Elmore, R., & McLaughlin, M. (1988). Steady work. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
10. Fuhrman, S., & Malen, B. (1991). The politics of curriculum and testing. New York: Falmer.
11. Lane, J., & Epps, E. (1992). Restructuring the schools. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
12. Lindblom, C., & Braybrooke, D. (1963). A strategy of decision. New York: Free Press.
13. Marshall, C., Mitchell, D., & Wirt, F. (1989). Culture and educational policy in the American states. New York: Palmer.
14. Massell, D., & Kirst, M. (1994). Setting national content standards. In D. Massell & M. Kirst (Eds.), Education and Urban Society, 26(2), 107-195.
15. Reich, R. (1992). The power of ideas. New York: Basic.
16. Scribner, J., & Layton, D. (1995). The study of educational politics. New York: Falmer.
17. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. West, P. (1993, April 14). NCTM conferees discuss issues. Education Week, p. 23.
19. Wirt, F., & Kirst, M. (1975). Political and social foundations of education (1st ed.). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
20. Wirt, F., & Kirst, M. (1989). Schools in conflict (3d ed.). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
21. Wirt, F., & Kirst, M. (1992). Schools in conflict (4th ed.). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
22. Yee, G., & Kirst, M. (1994). Lessons from the new science curriculum of the 1950's and 1960's. Education and Urban Society, 26(2), 158-171.
23. Yin, R. (1984). Case study research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24. Zahorchak, G., & Boyd, W. (1994, October). The politics of outcome-based education in Pennsylvania. Paper presented at the annual conference of the University Council for Educational Administration, Philadelphia.