Intellectual property crimes

American Criminal Law Review

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 971-1023

  Noonan, Carol ^a   Raskin, Jeffery ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345893912     PISSN: 01640364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. 35 U.S.C. § 292(a) (1994) (establishing fines for forgery and counterfeiting); e.g., Accent Designs, Inc. v. Jan Jewelry Designs, Inc., 827 F. Supp. 957, 968-70 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) (applying § 292(a)'s fining mechanism).
2. 35 U.S.C. § 292(a) (1994) (establishing fines for forgery and counterfeiting); e.g., Accent Designs, Inc. v. Jan Jewelry Designs, Inc., 827 F. Supp. 957, 968-70 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) (applying § 292(a)'s fining mechanism).
3. E.g., Krieger v. Colby, 106 F. Supp. 124, 131 (S.D. Cal. 1952) (imposing eight separate fines on defendants who received shipments of goods with labels violating the predecessor to § 292). But see Sadler-Cisar, Inc. v. Commercial Sales Network, Inc., 786 F. Supp. 1287, 1296 (N.D. Ohio 1991) (holding that "continuous markings over a given time constitute a single offense" under § 292(a)).
4. E.g., Krieger v. Colby, 106 F. Supp. 124, 131 (S.D. Cal. 1952) (imposing eight separate fines on defendants who received shipments of goods with labels violating the predecessor to § 292). But see Sadler-Cisar, Inc. v. Commercial Sales Network, Inc., 786 F. Supp. 1287, 1296 (N.D. Ohio 1991) (holding that "continuous markings over a given time constitute a single offense" under § 292(a)).
5. 35 U.S.C. § 292(b) (1994); see Mainland Indus., Inc. v. Standal's Patents, Ltd., 229 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 43, 46 (D. Or. 1985) (holding that half the fines are payable to the United States), aff'd, 799 F.2d 746 (Fed. Cir. 1986) overruled on other grounds by A.C. Auckerman v. R.L. Chaides Const. 960 F2.d 1020 (Fed. Cir. 1992) (holding the burden of persuasion for summary judgment in a patent infringement case does not shift by reason of the patentee's six-year delay in bring suit).
6. 35 U.S.C. § 292(b) (1994); see Mainland Indus., Inc. v. Standal's Patents, Ltd., 229 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 43, 46 (D. Or. 1985) (holding that half the fines are payable to the United States), aff'd, 799 F.2d 746 (Fed. Cir. 1986) overruled on other grounds by A.C. Auckerman v. R.L. Chaides Const. 960 F2.d 1020 (Fed. Cir. 1992) (holding the burden of persuasion for summary judgment in a patent infringement case does not shift by reason of the patentee's six-year delay in bring suit).
7. 35 U.S.C. § 292(b) (1994); see Mainland Indus., Inc. v. Standal's Patents, Ltd., 229 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 43, 46 (D. Or. 1985) (holding that half the fines are payable to the United States), aff'd, 799 F.2d 746 (Fed. Cir. 1986) overruled on other grounds by A.C. Auckerman v. R.L. Chaides Const. 960 F2.d 1020 (Fed. Cir. 1992) (holding the burden of persuasion for summary judgment in a patent infringement case does not shift by reason of the patentee's six-year delay in bring suit).
8. 35 U.S.C. § 292(b) (1994); see Mainland Indus., Inc. v. Standal's Patents, Ltd., 229 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 43, 46 (D. Or. 1985) (holding that half the fines are payable to the United States), aff'd, 799 F.2d 746 (Fed. Cir. 1986) overruled on other grounds by A.C. Auckerman v. R.L. Chaides Const. 960 F2.d 1020 (Fed. Cir. 1992) (holding the burden of persuasion for summary judgment in a patent infringement case does not shift by reason of the patentee's six-year delay in bring suit).
9. 18 U.S.C. § 497 (1994) (letters patent statute).
10. 18 U.S.C. § 497 (1994) (setting imprisonment guidelines for false marking violations).
11. 18 U.S.C. § 3571(b) (1994) (outlining fines for individuals); 18 U.S.C. § 3571(c) (1994) (setting forth fines for organizations);
12. 18 U.S.C. § 3571(b) (1994) (outlining fines for individuals); 18 U.S.C. § 3571(c) (1994) (setting forth fines for organizations);
13. U.S.C. § 3571(d) (1994) (stating that fine equals twice gross gain or loss when violators have pecuniary gain or if victim suffer loss).
14. U.S.S.G. MANUAL app. A (1998) (pointing to the guidelines for forging letters patent).