Efficiency and Effectiveness Analysis of Chicago Public Elementary Schools: 1989, 1991, 1993

Educational Administration Quarterly

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 484-504

  Anderson, Lascelles ^a   Walberg, Herbert J ^a   Weinstein, Thomas ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345884626     PISSN: 0013161X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013161X98034004003     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Anderson, L., & Walberg, H. (1994). Data envelopment analysis. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
2. Bessent, A. M., & Bessent, E. W. (1993). Using data envelopment analysis for measuring productivity. In H. J. Walberg (Ed.), Advances in educational productivity: Analytic methods for educational productivity. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
3. Bessent, A. M., Bessent, E. W., Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Thorgood, N. (1983). Evaluation of educational program proposals by means of data envelopment analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 19(2), 82-107.
4. Bessent, A. M., Bessent, E. W., Clark, T., & Elam, J. (1988). Efficiency frontier determination by constrained facet analysis. Operations Research, 36(5), 785-786.
5. Bessent, A. M., Bessent, E. W., Kennington, T., & Reagan, B. (1982). An application of mathematical programming to assess productivity in the Houston Independent School District. Management Science, 28(12), 1355-1367.
6. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
7. Consortium on Chicago School Research. (1995). Charting reform: Chicago teachers take stock. Chicago: Author.
8. Edmonds, R. (1979). Some schools work and more can. Social Policy, 9(5), 28-32.
9. Hanushek, E. A. (1986). The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24, 1141-1177.
10. Jorgenson, D. W. (1996). Introduction. In E. A. Hanushek & D. W. Jorgenson (Eds.), Improving America's schools: The role of incentives. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
11. Miller, T. (1985, October). Structure based changes in performance: The proper focus for social science. Paper presented at the Association for Public Policy and Management Conference, Boston, MA.
12. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
13. Niemiec, R. P., & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.). (1993). Evaluating Chicago school reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Whole issue Fall 1993, New Directions in Program Evaluation, a Publication of the American Evaluation Association.
14. Seiford, L. M. (1996). Data envelopment analysis: The evaluation of the state of the art (1978-1995). Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7(2/3), 99-137.
15. Silberberg, E. (1978). The structure of economics: A mathematical analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Smith, M. S., Scoll, B. W., & Link, J. (1996). Research-based school reform: The Clinton administration's agenda. In E. A. Hanushek & D. W. Jorgenson (Eds.), Improving America's schools: The role of incentives. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.