Formal Requirements of Markov State Models for Paired Associate Learning

Journal of Mathematical Psychology

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 324-333

  Katsikopoulos, Konstantinos V ^a   Fisher, Donald L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Markov models; minimum complexity; lag effects

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345879365     PISSN: 00222496     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmps.2000.1318     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Atkinson R. C. Optimizing the learning of a second-language vocabulary. Journal of Experimentall Psychology. 96:1972;124-129.
2. Atkinson R. C., Crothers E. J. A comparison of paired-associate learning models having different acquisition and retention axioms. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1:1964;285-315.
3. Balota D. A., Duchek J. M., Paullin R. Age-related differences in the impact of spacing, lag, and retention interval. Psychology and Aging. 3:1989;3-9.
4. Batchelder W. H., Chosak-Reiter J., Shankle W. R., Dick M. B. A multinomial modeling analysis of memory deficits in Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences. 52B:1997;206-215.
5. Bower G. H. Application of a model to paired-associate learning. Psychometrika. 26:1961;255-280.
6. Crowder R. G. Principles of learning and memory. 1976;Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
7. Fisher D. L. State models of paired associate learning: The general acquisition, decrement and training hypotheses. Rogers W. A., Fisk A. D., Walker N. Aging and skilled performance: Advances in theory and applications. 1995.
8. Fisher D. L., Wisher R. A., Ranney T. Optimal static and dynamic training schedules: State models of skill acquisition. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 40:1996;30-47.
9. Glenberg A. M. Monotonic and nonmonotonic lag effects in paired-associate and recognition memory paradigms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 15:1976;1-16.
10. Greeno J. G. Paired associate learning with short term retention: Mathematical analysis and data regarding identification of parameters. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 4:1967;430-471.
11. Greeno J. G., Bjork R. A. Mathematical learning theory and the new "mental forestry" Annual Review of Psychology. 24:1973;81-116.
12. Karush W., Dear R. E. Optimal stimulus presentation strategy for a stimulus sampling model of learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 3:1966;19-47.
13. Katsikopoulos K. V., Fisher D. L. Experimental evaluation of training strategies in paired associate tasks. Paper presented at the 31 st Annual Society for Mathematical Psychology Meetings. 1998.
14. Katsikopoulos, K. V, Fisher, D. L, &, Duffy, S. A. 2000, Latent models of paired associate learning: Effects of age on cognitive processes, submitted for publication.
15. Kemeny J. G., Snell J. L. Finite Markov chains. 1960;Van Nostrand Reinhold, Princeton.
16. Lorton P. Jr. Computer-based instruction in spelling: An investigation of optimal strategies for presenting material. 1972;Stanford University.
17. Sperber R. D., Greenfield D. B., House B. J. A nonmonotonic effect of distribution of trials in retardate learning and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 99:1973;186-198.
18. Wickens T. D. Models for behavior: Stochastic processes in Psychology. 1982;Freeman, San Fransisco.
19. Young J. L. Reinforcement-test intervals in paired associate learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 8:1971;58-81.