Using Response Latency Measures for a Biographical Inventory

Military Psychology

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 169-188

  Stricker, Lawrence J ^a   Alderton, David L ^b  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

^b LAC+USC Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345877153     PISSN: 08995605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327876mp1102_3     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alderton, D. L., Wolfe, J. H., & Larson, G. E. (1997). The ECAT battery. Military Psychology, 9, 5-37.
2. Cattell, R. B. (1952). The three basic factor-analytic research designs - Their interrelations and derivatives. Psychological Bulletin, 49, 499-520.
3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the be havioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Dunn, T. G., Lushene, R. E., & O'Neil, H. F., Jr. (1972). Complete automation of the MMPI anda study of its response latencies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 39, 381-387.
6. Fekken, G. C., & Jackson, D. N. (1988). Predicting consistent psychological test item responses: A comparison of models. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 873-882.
7. Gilbert, A. R. (1967). Increased diagnostic value of the Taylor Manifest Anxiety Scale by use of response latency. Psychological Reports, 20, 63-67.
8. Goldberg, L. R. (1963). A model of item ambiguity in personality assessment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 23, 467-492.
9. Hanley, C. (1962). The "difficulty" of a personality inventory item. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 22, 577-584.
10. Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1951). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.
11. Holden, R. R., & Fekken, G. C. (1990). Structured psychopathological test item characteristics and validity. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 35-40.
12. Holden, R. R., Fekken, G. C., & Cotton, D. H. G. (1991). Assessing psychopathology using structured test-item response latencies. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 111-118.
13. Holden, R. R., Fekken, G. C., & Jackson, D. N. (1985). Structured personality test item characteristics and validity. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 386-394.
14. Holden, R. R., Kroner, D. G., Fekken, G. C., & Popham, S. M. (1992). A model of personality test item response dissimulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 272-279.
15. Hsu, L. M., Santelli, J., & Hsu, J. R. (1989). Faking detection validity and incremental validity of response latencies to MMPI subtle and obvious items. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 278-295.
16. Jackson, D. N. (1984). Personality Research Form manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.
17. Jackson, D. N. (1989). Basic Personality Inventory manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.
18. Jensen, A. R. (1985). Methodological and statistical techniques for the chronometric study of mental abilities. In C. R. Reynolds & V. L. Wilson (Eds.), Methodological and statistical advances in the study of individual differences (pp. 51-116). New York: Plenum.
19. Kuncel, R. B. (1973). Response processes and relative location of subject and item. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33, 545-563.
20. Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63-78.
21. McNemar, Q. (1962). Psychological statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
22. Mervielde, I. (1988). Cognitive processes and computerized personality assessment. European Journal of Personality, 2, 97-111.
23. Pachella, R. G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information-processing research. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 41-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24. Popham, S. M., & Holden R. R. (1990). Assessing MMPI constructs through the measurement of response latencies. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 469-478.
25. Rafacz, B., & Hetter, R. D. (1997). ACAP hardware selection, software development, and acceptance testing. In W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, & J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing - From inquiry to operation (pp. 145-156). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26. Rogers, T. B. (1973). Toward a definition of the difficulty of a personality item. Psychological Reports, 33, 159-166.
27. Rogers, T. B. (1974a). An analysis of the stages underlying the process of responding to personality items. Acta Psychologica, 38, 205-214.
28. Rogers, T. B. (1974b). An analysis of two central stages underlying responding to personality items: The self-referent decision and response selection. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 128-138.
29. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
30. Siem, F. M. (1996). The use of response latencies to enhance self-report personality measures. Military Psychology, 8, 15-27.
31. Stead, W. H., & Shartle, C. L. (1940). Occupational counseling techniques. New York: American Book.
32. Stephenson, W. (1936). The foundations of psychometry: Four factor systems. Psychometrika, 1, 195-209.
33. Temple, D. E., & Geisinger, K. F. (1990). Response latency to computer-administered inventory items as an indicator of emotional arousal. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 288-297.
34. Trent, T. (1993). The Armed Services Applicant Profile (ASAP). In T. Trent & J. H. Laurence (Eds.), Adaptability screening for the Armed Forces (pp. 71-99). Washington, DC: Department of Defense, Office of Assistant Secretary of Defense (Force Management and Personnel).
35. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.