Benefiting from negative feedback

Human Resource Management Review

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 631-646

  Audia, Pino G ^a   Locke, Edwin A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Criticism; Negative feedback; Self esteem

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345868415     PISSN: 10534822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2003.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ashford S.J. Self-assessment in organizations: A literature review and integrative model Research in Organizational Behavior 11 1989 133-174
2. Ashford S.J. Cummings L.L. Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies for creating information Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 32 1983 370-398
3. Audia P.G. Locke E.A. Smith K.G. The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following a radical environmental change Academy of Management Journal 43 2000 837-853
4. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control 1997 W.H. Freeman New York
5. Baron R.A. Negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance Journal of Applied Psychology 73 1988 199-207
6. Baron R.A. Criticism (informal negative feedback) as a source of perceived unfairness in organizations: Effects, mechanisms, and countermeasures In Greenberg (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management 1993
7. Blaine B. Crocker J. Self-esteem and self-serving biases in reactions to positive and negative events: An integrative review In Baumeister R.F. (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard 1993 Plenum New York
8. Coopersmith S. The antecedents of self-esteem 1967 W.H. Freeman San Francisco
9. Earley P.C. Northcraft G.B. Lee C. Lituchi T.R. Impact of process and outcome feedback on the relation of goal setting to task performance Academy of Management Journal 33 1989 87-105
10. Elster J. Ulysses and the sirens: Studies in rationality and irrationality 1979 Cambridge University Press London
11. Fedor D.B. Recipient responses to performance feedback: A proposed model and its implications Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management 9 1991 73-120
12. Fedor, D. B., Davis, W., Maslyn, J. M., & Methieson, L. K. (1999). Performance improvement efforts in response to negative feedback: The roles of source power and recipient self-esteem. Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology.
13. Fedor, D. B., & Ramsay, R. J. (1999). Employee responses to corrective feedback: Focusing on the role of supervisor power. Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology.
14. Fedor D.B. Rensvold R.B. Adams S.M. An investigation of factors expected to affect feedback seeking: A longitudinal field study Personnel Psychology 45 1992 779-805
15. Fisher C.D. Transmission of positive and negative feedback to subordinates: A laboratory investigation Journal of Applied Psychology 64 1978 533-540
16. Hammond K.R. Summers D.A. Deane D.D. Negative effects of outcome feedback Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 9 1973 30-34
17. Hogarth R.M. Einhorn H.J. Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model Cognitive Psychology 24 1992 1-55
18. Ilgen D.R. Fisher C.D. Taylor M.S. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations Journal of Applied Psychology 64 1979 349-371
19. Kluger A.N. DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory Psychological Bulletin 119 1996 254-284
20. Kramer R.M. Stalking the sinister attribution error: Paranoia inside the lab and out Research on Negotiation in Organizations 7 1999 59-91
21. Larson Jr. J.R. The dynamic interplay between employees' feedback seeking strategies and supervisors' delivery of performance feedback Academy of Management Review 14 1989 408-422
22. Locke E.A. Latham G.P. A theory of goal setting and task performance 1990 Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ
23. Locke E.A. McClear K. Knight D. Self-esteem and work In Cooper C. Robertson I. (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 1996 Wiley Chichester, UK
24. March J.G. Simon H.A. Organizations 1958 Wiley New York
25. Miller D.T. Ross M. Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin 82 1975 313-325
26. Morrison E.W. Bies R.J. Impression management in the feedback-seeking process: A literature review and a research agenda Academy of Management Review 16 1991 522-541
27. O'Keefe D.J. Persuasion 1990 Sage Newbury Park, CA
28. O'Reilly C.A. The use of information in organizational decision making: A model and some propositions Research in Organizational Behavior 5 1983 103-139
29. Petty R.E. Cacioppo J.T. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion In Berkowitz L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology vol. 19 1986 123-205 Academic Press New York
30. Shrauger J.S. Responses to evaluation as a function of initial perceptions Psychological Bulletin 82 1975 581-596
31. Snyder M. Self-monitoring processes In Berkowitz L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology vol. 12 1979 85-128 Academic Press New York
32. Spencer S.J. Josephs R.A. Steele C.M. Low self-esteem: The uphill struggle for self-integrity In Baumeister R.F. (Edst.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard 1993 New York Plenum
33. Steele C.M. The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self In Berkowitz L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology vol. 21 1988 261-302 Academy Press New York
34. Taylor M.S. Fisher C.D. Ilgen D.R. Individual reactions to performance feedback in organizations: A control theory perspective Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management 2 1984 81-124
35. Tesser A. Rosen S. The reluctance to transmit bad news In Berkowitz L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology vol. 8 1975 193-232 Academy Press New York
36. Wood R.E. Locke E.A. Goal setting and strategy effects on complex tasks In Staw B.M. Cummings L.L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior vol. 12 1990 73-109 JAI Greenwich, CT