An order-based theory of updates for closed database views

Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 40, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 63-125

  Hegner, Stephen J ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Database; Update; View

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345863801     PISSN: 10122443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1026158013113     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. S. Abiteboul, R. Hull and V. Vianu, Foundations of databases (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995).
2. J. Adámek, H. Herrlich and G. Strecker, Abstract and Concrete Categories (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1990).
3. F. Bancilhon and N. Spyratos, Update semantics of relational views, ACM Transactions on Database Systems 6 (1981) 557-575.
4. Z. Bellahsène, Updates and object-generating views in ODBS, Data and Knowledge Engineering 34 (2000) 125-163.
5. F. Bentayeb and D. Laurent, View updates translations in relational databases, in: Proc. of DEXA '98, Vienna (24-28 September 1998) pp. 322-331.
6. B.A. Davey and H.A. Priestly, Introduction to Lattices and Order, 2nd ed. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2002).
7. P. De Bra and J. Paredaens, Horizontal decompositions for handling exceptions to functional dependencies, in: Advances in Data Base Theory, eds. H. Gallaire, J. Minker and J.M. Nicolas, Vol. 2 (Plenum Press, New York, 1984) pp. 123-141.
8. R. Fagin, Horn clauses and database dependencies, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 29(4) (1982) 952-985.
9. G. Gottlob, P. Paolini and R. Zicari, Properties and update semantics of consistent views, ACM Transactions on Database Systems 13 (1988) 486-524.
10. J. Grant and B.E. Jacobs, On the family of generalized dependency constraints, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 29(5) (1982) 986-997.
11. G. Grätzer, Universal Algebra (D. Van Nostrand, New York, 1968).
12. S.J. Hegner, Foundations of canonical update support for closed database views, in: ICDT'90, 3rd Internat. Conf. on Database Theory, eds. S. Abiteboul and P.C. Kanellakis, Paris, France (December 1990) pp. 422-436.
13. S.J. Hegner, Some open problems on view axiomatization, Bulletin of the EATCS (40) (1990) 496-498.
14. S.J. Hegner, Characterization of desirable properties of general database decompositions, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 7 (1993) 129-195.
15. S.J. Hegner, Unique complements and decompositions of database schemata, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 48(1) (1994) 9-57.
16. S.J. Hegner, Uniqueness of update strategies for database views, in: Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems: Proc. of the 2nd Internal. Symposium, FoIKS 2002, Salzau Castle, Germany (February 2002) pp. 230-249.
17. R. Hull, Finitely specifiable implicational dependency families, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 31(2) (1984) 210-226.
18. E. Mayol and E. Teniente, A survey of current methods for integrity constraint maintenance and view updating, in: Proc. of ER '99 Workshops, Paris (15-18 November 1999) Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1727 (Springer, New York, 1999).
19. J.D. Monk, Mathematical Logic (Springer, Berlin, 1976).
20. B. Thalheim, Entity-Relationship Modeling (Springer, Berlin, 2000).
21. K. Wang and M.H. Graham, Constant-time maintainability: A generalization of independence, ACM Transactions on Database Systems 17(2) (1992) 201-246.