Validation of the Need for Cognition Scale and its Application to Attitude Change;Validación de la escala de necesidad de cognición y su aplicación al estudio del cambio de actitudes

Psicothema

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 622-628

  Falces, Carlos ^a   Briñol, Pablo ^b   Sierra, Benjamín ^b   Becerra, Alberto ^b   Alier, Elena ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345859646     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ahlering, R.F. (1987). Need for cognition, attitudes, and the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 100-102.
2. Axson, D. Yates, S., y Chaiken, S. (1987). Audience response as a heuristic cue in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 (1), 30-40.
3. Bentler, M. P. y Dudgeon, P. (1996). Covariance structure analysis: Statistical pratice, theory and directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 563-592.
4. Briñol, P., Sierra, B., Falces, C., Becerra, A. y Froufe, M. (2000). La eficacia relativa del efecto de mera exposición y del condicionamiento clásico en la formación de preferencias. Psicothema, vol 12, no4, pp. 586-593.
5. Browne, M.W., y Kudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assesing model fit. En K. A. Bollen y J.S. Long (Eds.). Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., y Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of «need for cognition.» Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307.
7. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., y Morris, K. (1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, argument recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 805-818.
8. Cacioppo, J. T., y Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
9. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Feinstein, J., y Jarvis, W.B.G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
10. Cacioppo, J.T., y Petty, R.E. (1981). Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: The thought listing technique. En T. Merluzzi, C. Glass, y M. Genest (Eds.), Cognitive assessment (pp. 309-342). New York: Guilford.
11. Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J.M. Olson y C.P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Chaiken, S. y Y. Trope (1999). Dual-process Theories in Social Psychology. New York: Guilford.
13. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., y Eagly , A.H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic proccesing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J.S. Uleman y J.A. Bargh (eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford Press.
14. Davis, T.L., Severy, L.J., Kraus, S.J. y Whitaker, J.M. (1993). Predictors of sentencing decisions: The beliefs, personality variables, and demographic factors of juvenile justice personnel. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 451-477.
15. Gutiérrez, J., Bajén, M.J., Sintas, M. y Amat, M. (1993). Evaluación de la tendencia al esfuerzo cognitivo. Anuario de Psicología, 58, 53-67.
16. Haugtvedt, C. P., y Petty, R. E. (1992). Personality and persuasion: Need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 308-319.
17. Haugtvedt, C.P., Petty, R.E., y Cacioppo, J.T. (1992). Need for cognition and advertising: Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1, 239-260.
18. Petty, R.E., y Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion. En L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
19. Petty, R.E., y Wegener, D.T. (1998). Attitude change. En D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, y G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
20. Pieters, R.G.M., Verplanken, B. Y Modde, J.M. (1987). Need for cognition: Relationship with reasoned action. Nederlands Tijdschirft voor de Psychologie, 42, 62-70.
21. Stark, J.S., Bentley, R.J., Lowther, M.A. y Shaw, K.M. (1991). The student exploration: reliability and concurrent validity. Education and Psychological Measurement, 51, 413-422.
22. Tanaka, J.S., Panter, A. y Winborne, W.C. (1988). Dimensions of the need for cognition: Subscales and gender differences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 35-50.
23. Thompson, M.M. y Zanna, M.P. (1995). The conflicted individual: Personality based and domain-specific antecedents of ambivalent social attitudes. Journal of Personality, 63, 259-288.