Molecular evaluation of two methods for developing maize synthetic varieties

Molecular Breeding

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 329-333

  Butron A ^a   Tarrio, R ^a   Revilla, P ^a   Malvar, R A ^a   Ordas A ^a  

^a MISIÓN BIOLÓGICA DE GALICIA CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GRAIN (AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT); PLANTS (BOTANY);

BASE MATERIAL; CHROMOSOMAL LOCATION; INBRED LINE; MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.); MATINGS; PARENTAL INBREDS; RANDOM METHODS; SAVES TIME; SIMPLE SEQUENCE-REPEAT MARKERS; THINNINGS;

DNA SEQUENCES;

ZEA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 0345832154     PISSN: 13803743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:MOLB.0000006718.11324.4f     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Crossa J. 1989. Methodologies for estimating the sample size required for genetic conservation of outbreeding crops. Theor. Appl. Genet. 77: 153-161.
2. Gutierrez M.G. and Sprague G.F. 1959. Randomness of mating in isolated polycross plantings of maize. Genetics 44: 1075-1082.
3. Márquez-Sánchez F. 1992. Inbreeding and yield prediction in synthetic variety maize cultivars made with parental lines: I. Basic methods. Crop Sci. 32: 345-349.
4. Márquez-Sánchez F. 1993. Inbreeding and yield prediction in synthetic variety cultivars of maize: II. Random methods. Crop Sci. 33: 1153-1157.
5. Nei M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist 106: 283-292.
6. Nei M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583-590.
7. Rubino D.B. and Davis D.W. 1991. Maintenance of tropical isozyme alleles during random mating in a semiexotic maize composite. J. Hered. 82: 423-425.