Public Access to Lake Superior and Attribute Values of Proximate Non-Shoreline Property

Journal of Great Lakes Research

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 616-629

  Orr, Blair D ^a   Pickens, James B ^a  

^a MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hedonic analysis; Lake Superior; Open space; Parks; Property values; Rural development

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; STATISTICAL METHODS; TAXATION; URBAN PLANNING;

HEDONIC ANALYSIS;

LAKES;

LAKE; OPEN SPACE; PROPERTY MARKET; PUBLIC ACCESS; RURAL DEVELOPMENT; WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT;

GREAT LAKES; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 0345832054     PISSN: 03801330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0380-1330(03)70465-1     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Arguea, N.M., and Hsiao, C. 1993. Econometric issues of estimating hedonic price functions with an application to the US market for automobiles. J. Econometrics 56:243-267.
2. Barnett, CJ. 1985. An application of the hedonic price model to the Perth residential land market. The Economic Record 61(172):476-481.
3. Bastian, C.T., McLeod, D.M., Germino, M.J., Reiners, W.A., and Blasko, B.J. 2002. Environmental amenities and agricultural land values: a hedonic model using geographic systems data. Ecological Economics 40(2002):337-349.
4. Beale, C.L., and Johnson, K.M. 1998. The identification of recreational counties in nonmetropolitan areas of the USA. Population Research and Policy Review 17:37-53.
5. Boyd, J., Caballero, K., and Simpson, R.D. 1999. Carving out some space: a guide to land preservation strategies. Resources 136:10-13.
6. Bredin, J., and Bankard, E. 2000. Great Lakes trends: Into the new millennium. Office of the Great Lakes, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. Lansing MI.
7. Brown, G.M., and Pollakowski, H.O. 1977. Economic valuation of shoreline. The Review of Economics and Statistics 59:272-278.
8. Carlton, J. 2001. Saga of the Santa Lucia Preserve nears a close. Wall St. Journal, Wednesday, February 28, 2001. page B16.
9. Clapp, J.M., and Giaccotto, C. 1998. Price indices base on the hedonic repeat-sales method: application to the housing market. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 16(1):5-26.
10. Cordell, H.K., and Bergstrom, J.C. 1989 Theory and techniques for assessing the demand and supply of outdoor recreation in the United States. USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, NC. Research Paper SE-275.
11. Deller, S. 1995. Economic impact of retirement migration. Economic Development Quarterly 9(1):25-38.
12. Do, A.Q., and Grudnitski, G. 1991. Golf courses and residential housing prices: An empirical examination. J. Real Estate Finance and Economics 10(3):261-270.
13. Dorfman, J.H., Keeler, A.G., and Kriesel, W. 1996. Valuing risk-reducing interventions with hedonic models: the case of erosion prevention. J. Agricultural and Resource Economics 21(1):109-119.
14. Doss, C.R., and Taff, S.J. 1996. The influence of wetland type and wetland proximity on residential property values. J. Agricultural and Resource Economics 21(1):120-129.
15. Frech, H.E., and Lafferty, R.N. 1984. The effect of California Coastal Commission on housing prices. J. Urban Economics 16:105-123.
16. Freeman, A.M. 1979. Hedonic prices, property values, and measuring environment benefits: A survey of the issues. Scandanavian Journal of Economics 81:154-173.
17. Geoghegan, J., Wainger, L.A., and Bockstael, N.E. 1997. Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: an ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecological Economics 23(1997):251-264.
18. Gobster, P.H., Haight, R.G., and Shriner, D. 2000. Landscape change in the midwest: an integrated research and development program. J. Forestry 98(3):9-14.
19. Gottlieb, P.D. 1994. Amenities as an economic development tool: Is there enough evidence? Economic Development Quarterly 8(3):270-285.
20. Granger, C.W.J., and Newbold, P. 1974. Spurious regressions in econometrics. J. Econometrics. 2(July):111-120.
21. Green, G.P., Marcouiller, D., Deller, S., Erkkila, D., and Sumathi, N.R. 1996. Local dependency, land use attitudes, and economic development: comparisons between seasonal and permanent residents. Rural Sociology 61(3):421-445.
22. Huh, S., and Kwak, S-J. 1997. The choice of functional form and variables in hedonic price model in Seoul. Urban Studies 34(7):989-998.
23. Kendall, J., and Pigozzi, B.W. 1994. Nonemployment income and the economic base of Michigan Counties: 1959-1986. Growth and Change 25(Winter, 1994):51-74.
24. Kirshner, D., and Moore, D. 1989. The effect of San Francisco Bay water quality on adjacent property values. J. Environmental Management 27:263-274.
25. Knight, K.D., Nelson, J.G., and Priddle, G.B. 1987. Great Lakes Shoreline Resource Management: A Selected Annotated Bibliography. Occasional Paper No. 7, Heritage Resources Centre, University of Waterloo, Ontario.
26. Leamer, E.E. 1983. Let's take the con out of econometrics. American Economic Review 73(1):31-43.
27. Leefers, L.A., and Jones, D.M. 1996. Phase II Final Report: Assessing changes in private property values along designated natural rivers in Michigan. Report submitted to the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Lansing, MI.
28. Orr, B. 1997. Land use change on Michigan's Lake Superior shoreline: integrating land tenure and land cover type data. J. Great Lakes Res. 23(3):328-338.
29. Pogodzinski, J.M., and Sass, T.R. 1991. Zoning and hedonic housing price models. J. Housing Economics 1(3):271-292.
30. Schutjer, W.A., and Hallberg, M.C. 1968. Impact of water recreational development on rural property values. Am. J. Agricultural Economics 50(Aug.): 572-583.
31. Scotchmer, S. 1984. Preference revelation and hedonic price data. Harvard Inst. for Econ. Res. Disc. Paper 1062.
32. Slaats, M.J., and Kreutzwiser, R.D. 1993. Shoreline development regulations: Do they work? J. Soil and Water Conservation 1993(May-June):158- 165.
33. Song, S. 1996. Some tests of alternative accessibility measures: a population density approach. Land Economics 72(4):474-482.
34. Steel, R.G.D., and Torrie, J.H. 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics with special reference to the biological sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
35. Stynes, D.J., Zheng, J., and Stewart, S.I. 1997. Seasonal homes and natural resources: patterns of use and impact in Michigan. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station General Technical Report NC-194. St. Paul, MN.
36. Thorsnes, P., and McMillen, D. P. 1998. Land Value and Parcel Size: A Semiparametric Analysis. J. Real Estate Finance and Economics 17(3):233-244.
37. Turner, M.G., Wear, D.N., and Flamm, R.O. 1996. Land ownership and land-cover change in the southern Appalachian highlands and the Olympic Peninsula. Ecological Applications 6(4): 1150-1172.
38. Wallace, N.E. 1996. Hedonic-based price indices for housing: theory, estimation, and index construction. The Economic Review 1996(3):34-48.
39. Watkins, A.R. 1999. Impacts of land development charges. Land Economics 75(3):415-424.
40. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources: 1995. Northern Wisconsin's lakes and shorelands report. Madison, WI.
41. Yeates, M.H. 1965. Some factors affecting the spatial distribution of Chicago land values. Economic Geography 41:57-70.