Are men and women really so different?

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 3-6

  Mulder, Monique Borgerhoff ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN BEHAVIOR; MATE CHOICE; PARENTAL INVESTMENT; SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL SELECTION;

EID: 0345801420     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2003.11.002     Document Type: Short Survey

References (20)

1. Clutton-Brock T.H., Parker G.A. Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Q. Rev. Biol. 67:1992;437-456.
2. Buss D.M. Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. 1999;Allyn and Bacon.
3. Trivers R. Parental investment and sexual selection. Campbell B. Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871-1971. 1972;139-179 Aldine Press.
4. Bateman A.J. Intrasexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity. 2:1948;349-368.
5. Smith E.A., et al. Controversies in the evolutionary social sciences: a guide for the perplexed. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:2001;128-135.
6. Hawkes K. Why hunter-gatherers work: an ancient version of the problem of public goods. Curr. Anthropol. 34:1993;341-361.
7. Hrdy S.B. Mother Nature: A History of Mothers, Infants, and Natural Selection. 1999;Pantheon Books.
8. Buston P.M., Emlen S.T. Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: the relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1000:2003;8805-8810.
9. Noë R., Hammerstein P. Biological markets. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:1995;336-339.
10. Barrett L., et al. Human Evolutionary Psychology. 2002;Palgrave.
11. Johnstone R.A., et al. Mutual mate choice and sex differences in choosiness. Evolution. 50:1996;1382-1391.
12. Wade M.J., Shuster S.M. The evolution of parental care in the context of sexual selection: a critical reassessment of parental investment theory. Am. Nat. 160:2002;285-292.
13. Kokko H., Jennions M. It takes two to tango. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:2003;103-104.
14. Hewlett B.S. Sexual selection and paternal investment among Aka pygmies. Betzig L., et al. Human Reproductive Behavior: A Darwinian Perspective. 1988;263-276 Cambridge University Press.
15. Kaplan H.S., Lancaster J.B. An evolutionary and ecological analysis of human fertility, mating patterns, and parental investment. Wachter K.W., Bulatao R.A. Offspring: Human Fertility Behavior in Biodemographic Perspective. 2003;170-223 National Academies Press.
16. Bergstrom C.T., Real L.A. Towards a theory of mutual mate choice: lessons from two-sided matching. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2:2003;493-508.
17. Hawkes K., et al. Hunting and nuclear families. Curr. Anthropol. 42:2001;689-701.
18. Alexander M.G., Fisher T.D. Truth and consequences: using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality. J. Sex Res. 40:2003;27-35.
19. Mascie-Taylor C.G.N. Assortative mating for psychometric characters. Mascie-Taylor C.G.N., Boyce A.J. Human Mating Patterns. 1988;61-82 Cambridge University Press.
20. Bereczkei T., Csanaky A. Mate choice, martial success, and reproduction in a modern society. Ethol. Sociobiol. 17:1996;17-35.