Evaluation of the in Vitro Digestion Computerized Monitoring System. 3. Dry Matter and/or Neutral Detergent Fiber Disappearance by Gas Production;Avaliação do Sistema de Monitoramento Computadorizado de Digestão in Vitro. 3. Desaparecimento da Matéria Seca e/ou FDN pela Produção de Gás

Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 537-544

  De Campos, Fábio Prudêncio ^a   Bose, Max Lázaro Vieira ^b   Boin, Celso ^b   Lanna, Dante Pazzanese Duarte ^b   De Morais, Jozivaldo Prudêncio Gomes ^c  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO CARLOS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Corn silage; Gas production; In vitro digestion

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 0345794031     PISSN: 01004859     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. BLUMMEL, M., ORSKOV, E.R. 1993. Comparison of in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughages in predicting feed intake in cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. and Tech., 40(3):109-119.
2. BUXTON, R.D., FALES, S.L. 1994. Planta environment and quality. In: FAHEY JR., G.C. (Ed.) Forage quality evaluation and utilization. Madison, Wisconsin, USA. p.155-199.
3. CAMPOS, F.P. Avaliação do sistema de monitoramento computadorizado de digestão in vitro e produção de gás camparada com os métodos in vivo e in situ. Piracicaba, SP, 1996, 61p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Agronomia) - Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"/Universidade de São Paulo, 1996.
4. CHERNEY, D.J.R., SICILIANO, J.J., PELL, A.N. 1993.Tecchinal note: Forage in vitro dry matter digestibility as influenced by fiber source in the donor cow diet. J. Anim. Sci., 71(5):1335-1338.
5. FOX, D.G., SNIFFEN, C.J., O'CONNOR, J.D. et al. 1990. A model for predicting requerements and feedstuff utilization. The Cornell net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets research: Cornell. 128p.
6. GOERING, K.H., VAN SOEST, P.J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some application), Washington: ARS-USDA (USDA Agricultural Handbook, 379p).
7. JUNG, H.G., VAREL, V.H. 1988. Influence of forage type on ruminal bacterial populations and subsequent in vitro fiber digestion. J. Dairy Sci., 71(2):1526-1535.
8. KHAZAAL, M.T., DENTINHO, M.T., RIBEIRO, J.M. et al. 1993. A comparison of gas production during incubation with rumen contents in vitro and nylon bag degradability as predictors of apparent digestibility in vivo and the voluntary intake of hays. Anim. Prod., 57:105-112.
9. KHAZAAL, M.T., DENTINHO, M.T., RIBEIRO, J.M. et al. 1995. Prediction of apparent digestibility and voluntary intake of hays fed to sheep: comparison between using fibre components, in vitro digestibility or characteristics of gas production or nylon bag degradation. J. Anim. Sci., 61(3):527-538.
10. MALAFAIA, P.A.M., VALADARES FILHO, S.C., VIEIRA, R.A.M., SILVA, J.F.C., PEREIRA, J.C. 1998. Cinética ruminal de alguns alimentos investigada por técnicas gravimétricas e metabólicas. R. Bras. Zootec., 27(2):370-380.
11. MENKE, K.H., RAAB, L., SALEWZKI, A., et al. 1979. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J. Agric. Sci., 93(1):217-222.
12. MENKE, K.H., STEINGASS, H. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Dev., 28(1):7-55
13. MORAIS, J.P.G., BOIN, C., CAMPOS, F.P. et al. Efeito de inoculante bacteriano em silagem de milho quanto a digestibilidade in vivo e fermentação. In. REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DEZOOTECNIA, 33, 1996, Fortaleza. Anais... Fortaleza: SBZ, 1996a, p.425-427.
14. MORAIS, J.P.G., BOIN, C., CAMPOS, F.P. et al. Efeito na degradação in situ e na taxa de passagem de silagem inoculada com aditivo microbiano. In: REUNIAO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 33, 1996, Fortaleza. Anais... Fortaleza: SBZ, 1996b, p.428-430.
15. NELSON, B.D., ELLZEY, H.D., MONTGOMERY, C. et al. 1973. Factors affecting the variability of an in vitro rumen fermentation technique for estimating forage quality. J. Dairy Sci., 55(3):358-366.
16. PELL, A.N., SCHOFIELD, P. 1993. Computerized monitoring of gas production to measure forage digestion in vitro. J. Dairy Sci. 76(4):1063-1073.
17. SCHOFIELD, P., PELL, A.N. 1995. Validity of using accumulated gas pressure readings to measure forage digestion in vitro: A comparasion involving three forages. J. Dairy Sci., 78(10):2230-2238.
18. SCHOFIELD, P., PITT, R.E., PELL, A.N. 1994. Kinetics of fiber digestion from in vitro gas production. J. Anim. Sci., 72(11):2980-2991.
19. STEFANON, B., PELL, A.N., SCHOFIELD, P. 1996. Effect of maturity on digestion kinetics of water-soluble and water-insoluble fractions of alfafa and brome hay. J. Anim. Sci., 74(5):1104-1115.
20. TILLEY,-J.M.A., TERRY, R.A. 1963. A two technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassl. Soc., 18:104-111.
21. TREI, J., HALE, W.U., THEURER, B. 1970. Effect of grain processing on in vitro gas production. J. Anim. Sci., 30(5):825-831.
22. VAN SOEST, P.J. 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2.ed. Ithaca: Cornell Press/Constock Publish. 476p.
23. WILKINS, J.R. 1974. Pressure transducer method for measuring gas production by microorganisms. Appl. Microbiol., 27:135-141.