Reviewing as social practice: Institutional constraints on critics' attention for contemporary fiction

Poetics

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 275-297

  Janssen, Susanne ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345775809     PISSN: 0304422X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-422X(96)00010-1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alsem, K.J. et al., 1982. De aanbodstructuur van de periodiek verschijnende pers in Nederland [The supply of the press media in The Netherlands]. 's-Gravenshage: Staatsuitgeverij.
2. Becker, Howard S., 1982. Art worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
3. Bel, J., 1993. Nederlandse literatuur in het fin de siècle. Een receptie-historisch overzicht van het proza tussen 1885 en 1900 [Dutch fin de siècle literature. A reception-history research of Dutch prose between 1885 and 1900], Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
4. Bevers, T., 1985. De chronische reflectie. Een sociologische beschouwing over beeldende kunst en kunstkritiek [The chronic reflection. A sociological view on art and art criticism]. Sociologische Gids 32, 81-111.
5. Bourdieu, Pierre, 1980. The production of belief: Contribution to an economy of symbolic goods. Media, Culture and Society 2, 261-293.
6. Bourdieu, Pierre, 1983. The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed. Poetics 12, 311-356.
7. Dijk, Nel van, 1994. De politiek van de literatuurkritiek. De reputatie-opbouw van Menno ter Braak in de Nederlanse letteren [Pragmatic considerations in literary criticism. The establishment of the reputation of Menno ter Braak in Dutch literature]. Delft: Eburon.
8. Ellis, J.M., 1974. The theory of literary criticism. A logical analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
9. Herpers, T., J. Hemels and H. Prins (eds.), 1993. Gids voor de informatiesector. Cijfers en trends [Guide for the information branch. Figures and trends]. 's-Gravenshage: Vuga/NBLC.
10. Janssen, Susanne, 1988. Institutional factors influencing the selection made by literary reviewers. SPIEL/Siegener Periodicum zur internationalen empirischen Literaturwissenschaft 7(2), 281-291.
11. Janssen, Susanne, 1991. The modus operandi of literary reviewers. In: Elrud Ibsch, Dick Schram and Gerard Steen (eds.), Empirical studies of literature, 185-194. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.
12. Janssen, Susanne, 1994. In het licht van de kritiek. Variaties en patronen in de aandacht van de literatuurkritiek voor auteurs en werken [The spotlights of criticism. Divergences and patterns in the attention of literary criticism for authors and their works]. Hilversum: Verloren.
13. Janssen, Susanne (forthcoming). Literary sidelines and their effect on the reputation of writers.
14. Nationaal Onderzoek Persmedia [National Research Press Media], 1982. Amsterdam: Stichting Nationaal Onderzoek Persmedia.
15. Nipo Media Onderzoek [Nipo Media Research], 1992.
16. Nooy, W. de, 1991. Social networks and classification in literature. Poetics 20(6), 507-537.
17. Pedhazur, Elazar J., 1982. Multiple regression in behavioral research. Explanation and prediction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
18. Peterson, Richard A., 1985. Six constraints on the production of literary works. Poetics 14, 45-67.
19. Radford, C. and S. Minogue, 1981. The nature of criticism. Sussex: Harvester Press.
20. Rees, C.J. van, 1983a. Advances in the empirical sociology of literature and the arts: The institutional approach. Poetics 12, 285-310.
21. Rees, C.J. van, 1983b. How a literary work becomes a masterpiece. On the threefold selection practised by literary criticism. Poetics 12, 397-417.
22. Rees, C.J. van, 1986. Literary theory and criticism. Conceptions of literature and their application. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.
23. Rees, C.J. van, 1987. How reviewers reach consensus on the value of literary works. Poetics 16, 275-294.
24. Rees, C.J. van, 1989. The institutional foundation of a critic's connoisseurship. Poetics 18, 179-198.
25. Ritchie, H., 1988. Succes stories. Literature and the media in England, 1950-1959. Londen/Boston: Faber and Faber.
26. Rodden, J., 1989. The politics of literary reputation. The making and claiming of 'St. George' Orwell. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Rosengren, Karl E., 1985. Time and literary fame. Poetics 14, 157-172.
28. Rosengren, Karl E., 1987. Literary criticism: Future invented. Poetics 16, 295-326.
29. Schmidt, S.J., 1982. Die empirische Literaturwissenschaft ELW. Ein neues Paradigma. SPIEL/Siegener Periodicum zur internationalen empirischen Literaturwissenschaft 1, 5-25.
30. Schmidt, S.J., 1989: Die Selbstorganisation des Sozialsystems Literatur im 18. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
31. Verdaasdonk, H., 1981. Literatuurbeschouwing en argumentatie [Literary criticism and argumentation]. Amsterdam: Huis aan de Drie Grachten.
32. Verdaasdonk, H., 1983. Social and economic factors in the attribution of literary quality. Poetics 12, 383-395.
33. Verdaasdonk, H., 1987. Effects of acquired readership and reviewers' attention on the sales of new literary works. Poetics 16, 237-253.
34. Viehoff, Reinhold, 1989. Literaturkritik 1973 und 1988. Aspekte des literaturkritischen Wertwandels. Siegen: Lumis.
35. Viehoff, Reinhold, 1991. Conditions of the critical assessment of literature: Some theses and empirical data on the interplay of social contexts, actions, and values. In: Elrud Ibsch, Gerard Steen and Dick Schram (eds.), Empirical studies of literature, 247-252. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.
36. Weitz, M., 1966. Hamlet and the philosophy of literary criticism. Cleveland/New York: Meridian Books.
37. Willems, E.J. and H. Prins, 1977. Literaire recensies. Een kwantitatieve inhoudsanalyse [Literary reviews. A quantitative content analysis]. Amsterdam: Instituut voor Perswetenschap.
38. Zuiderent A, H. Brems and T. van Deel (eds.), 1980. Lexicon van de Nederlandstalige literatuur na 1945 [Lexicon of Dutch literature after 1945]. Alphen aan de Rijn: Samson.