Discussion of "Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation: An Empirical Perspective"

Contemporary Accounting Research

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 121-130

  Hand, John R M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345774104     PISSN: 08239150     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1506/6A7C-74ML-TGBD-DYBW     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Ahmed, A. S., R. M. Morton, and T. F. Schaefer. 2000. Accounting conservatism and the valuation of accounting numbers: Evidence on the Feltham-Ohlson (1996) model. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 15 (Summer): 271-99.
2. Amir, E., and B. Lev. 1996. Value-relevance of nonfinancial information: The wireless communications industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22 (1-3): 3-30.
3. Barth, M. E., W. H. Beaver, J. R. M. Hand, and W. R. Landsman. 1999. Accruals, cash flows, and equity values. Review of Accounting Studies 4 (3-4): 205-29.
4. Barth, M. E., W. H. Beaver, and W. R. Landsman. 1992. The market valuation implications of net periodic pension cost components. Journal of Accounting and Economics 15 (1): 27-62.
5. _. 1998. Relative valuation roles of equity book value and net income as a function of financial health. Journal of Accounting and Economics 25 (1): 1-34.
6. Barth, M. E., and G. Clinch. 1998. Revalued financial, tangible, and intangible assets: Association with share prices and nonmarket-based valuation estimates. Journal of Accounting Research 36 (Supplement): 199-233.
7. Barth, M. E., and S. Kallapur. 1996. Effects of cross-sectional scale differences on regression results in empirical accounting research. Contemporary Accounting Research 13 (2): 527-67.
8. Beaver, W. H. 1999. Comments on "An empirical assessment of the residual income valuation model". Journal of Accounting and Economics 26 (1-3): 35-42.
9. Berger, P., E. Ofek, and I. Swary. 1996. Investor valuation of the abandonment option. Journal of Financial Economics 42 (2): 257-87.
10. Bernard, V. L. 1995. The Feltham-Ohlson framework: Implications for empiricists. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (2): 733-47.
11. 2 in accounting research: Measuring changes in value relevance over the last four decades. Journal of Accounting and Economics 28 (2): 83-115.
12. Burgstahler, D. C., and I. D. Dichev. 1997. Earnings, adaptation and equity value. Accounting Review 72 (April): 187-215.
13. Chang, J. 1999. The decline in value relevance of earnings and book values. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.
14. Christie, A. 1987. On cross-sectional analysis in accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 9: 231-58.
15. Collins, D. W., E. L. Maydew, and I. S. Weiss. 1997. Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (1): 39-67.
16. Collins, D. W., M. Pincus, and H. Xie. 1999. Equity valuation and negative earnings: The role of book-value of equity. Accounting Review 74 (1): 29-61.
17. Collins, J. H., and D. Kemsley. 2000. Capital gains and dividend taxes in firm valuation: Evidence of triple taxation. Accounting Review 75 (4): 405-27.
18. Constantinides, G. M., and J. Ye. 1999. Real options and the value of the firm: Theory and evidence. Working paper, University of Chicago.
19. Dechow, P. M., A. P. Hutton, and R. G. Sloan. 1999. An empirical assessment of the residual income valuation model. Journal of Accounting and Economics 26 (1-3): 1-34.
20. Easton, P. D. 1998. Discussion of "Revalued financial, tangible, and intangible assets: Association with share prices and non-market-based value estimates". Journal of Accounting Research 36 (Supplement): 235-47.
21. _. 1999. Security returns and the value relevance of accounting data. Working paper, Ohio State University.
22. Easton, P. D., and G. Sommers. 1999. Estimation of the relation between price and financial statement data. Working paper, Ohio State University.
23. Fama, E. F. 1976. Foundations of finance. New York: Basic Books.
24. Feltham, G. A., and J. A. Ohlson. 1995. Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (2): 689-731.
25. _. 1996. Uncertainty resolution and the theory of depreciation measurement. Journal of Accounting Research 34 (2): 209-34.
26. Francis, J., and K. Schipper. 1999. Have financial statements lost their relevance? Journal of Accounting Research 37 (2): 319-52.
27. Gebhardt, W. R., C. M. Lee, and B. Swaminathan. 2000. Toward an implied cost-of-capital. Journal of Accounting Research (forthcoming).
28. Guenther, D. A., and M. A. Trombley. 1994. The "LIFO" reserve and the value of the firm: Theory and empirical evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research 10 (2): 433-52.
29. Hand, J. R. M. 2000. Profits, losses and the non-linear pricing of Internet stocks. Working paper, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill.
30. Hand, J. R. M., and W. L. Landsman. 1999. Dividends and equity values: A reply to Lo and Lys (1999). Working paper, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill.
31. _. 2000. The pricing of dividends in equity valuation. Working paper, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill.
32. Harris, T. S., and D. Kemsley. 1999. Dividend taxation in firm valuation: New evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 37 (2): 275-92.
33. Ittner, C. D., and D. F. Larcker. 1998. Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction. Journal of Accounting Research 36 (Supplement): 1-35.
34. Kothari, S. P., and J. Zimmerman. 1995. Price and return models. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20 (2): 155-92.
35. Landsman, W. L., and J. Magliolo. 1988. Cross-sectional capital market research and model specification. Accounting Review 63 (October): 586-604.
36. Liu, J., and J. A. Ohlson. 1999. The Feltham-Ohlson (1995) model: Empirical applications. Working paper, University of California at Los Angeles.
37. Lo, K., and T. Lys. 2000. The Ohlson model: Contribution to valuation theory, limitations, and empirical applications. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 15 (Summer): 337-67.
38. Monahan, S. 1999. Conservatism, growth, and the role of accounting numbers in the equity valuation process. Working paper, University of Chicago.
39. Myers, J. N. 1999. Implementing residual income valuation with linear information dynamics. Accounting Review 74 (1): 1-28.
40. Ohlson, J. A. 1995. Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (2): 661-87.
41. _. 1999. Discussion of "An analysis of historical and future-oriented information in accounting-based security valuation models". Contemporary Accounting Research 16 (2): 381-4.
42. _. 2000. Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation: An empirical perspective. Contemporary Accounting Research 18 (1): 107-20.
43. Stober, T. 1998. Do prices behave as if accounting book values are conservative? Cross-sectional tests of the Feltham-Ohlson (1995) valuation model. Working paper, University of Notre Dame.
44. Tse, S., and R. Yaansah. 1999. An analysis of historical and future-oriented information in accounting-based security valuation models. Contemporary Accounting Research 16 (2): 347-80.
45. Ye, J. 1998. A statistical quest for equity valuation models. Working paper, University of Chicago.
46. Ye, J., and M. Finn. 1999. Nonlinear and nonparametric accounting-based equity valuation models. Working paper, Baruch College, The City University of New York.
47. Yee, K. K. 2000. Opportunities knocking: Residual income valuation of an adaptive firm. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 15 (3): 225-66.
48. Zhang, G. 1999. Accounting information, capital investment decisions, and equity valuation: Theory and empirical implications. Working paper, University of Hong Kong.
49. Zhang, X.-J. 1999. Conservative accounting and equity valuation. Working paper, University of California - Berkeley.