Interval-integration underlies amplitude modulation band-suppression selectivity in the anuran midbrain

Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology

Volumn 189, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 907-914

  Edwards, C J ^a   Rose, G J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

AM tuning; Band reject; Inferior colliculus; Temporal coding; Torus semicircularis

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; FROG; HEARING; HISTOLOGY; INFERIOR COLLICULUS; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; TIME; VOCALIZATION;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; INFERIOR COLLICULUS; NEURAL INHIBITION; NEURONS; RANA PIPIENS; REACTION TIME; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; TIME FACTORS; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 0345772247     PISSN: 03407594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00359-003-0467-2     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Albert M, Hose B, Langner G (1989) Modulation transfer functions in the auditory midbrain (MLD) of the guinea fowl (Mumida meleagris). In: Elsner N, Singer W (eds) Dynamics and plasticity in neuronal systems. Thieme, New York
2. Alder TB, Rose GJ (1998) Long-term temporal integration in the anuran auditory system. Nat Neurosci 1:519-523
3. Alder TB, Rose GJ (2000) Integration and recovery processes contribute to the temporal selectivity of neurons in the midbrain of the northern leopard frog, Rana pipiens. J Comp Physiol A 186:923-937
4. Brenowitz EA, Rose GJ (1994) Behavioural plasticity mediates aggression in choruses of the Pacific treefrog. Anim Behav 47:633-641
5. Capranica RR (1976) Morphology and physiology of the auditory system. In: Llinas R, Precht W (eds) Frog neurobiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 551-575
6. Capranica RR, Moffat AJM (1975) Selectivity of the peripheral auditory system of spadefoot toads (Scaphiopus couchi) to sounds of biological significance. J Comp Physiol A 100:231-249
7. Edwards CJ, Alder TB, Rose GJ (2002) Auditory midbrain neurons that count. Nat Neurosci 5:934-936
8. Falls JB (1963) Properties of bird song eliciting responses from territorial males. Proc Int Ornithol Congr 13:259-271
9. Gerhardt HC (1988). Acoustic properties used in call recognition by frogs and toads. In: Fritzch B, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W, Hetherington TE, Walkowiak W (eds) The evolution of the amphibian auditory system. Wiley, New York, pp 455-483
10. Huber F, Thorson J (1985) Cricket auditory communication. Sci Am 253(6, Dec):60-68
11. Olive JP, Greenwood A, Coleman J (1993). Acoustics of American English speech. A dynamic approach. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
12. Rose G (1986) A temporal-processing mechanism for all species? Brain Behav Evol 28:134-144
13. Rose G, Brenowitz EA (1997) Plasticity of aggressive thresholds in Hyla regilla: discrete accommodation to encounter calls. Anim Behav 53:353-361
14. Rose GJ, Brenowitz EA (2002) Pacific treefrogs use temporal integration to differentiate advertisement from encounter calls. Anim Behav 63:1183-1190
15. Rose G, Capranica RR (1983) Temporal selectivity in the central auditory system of the leopard frog. Science 219:1087-1089
16. Rose G, Capranica RR (1984) Processing amplitude-modulated sounds by the auditory midbrain of two species of toads: matched temporal filters. J Comp Physiol A 154:211-219
17. Wilczynski W, Capranica RR (1984) The auditory system of anuran amphibians. Prog Neurobiol 22:1-38