Circumferential mucosectomy with stapled proctopexy is a safe, effective outpatient alternative for the treatment of symptomatic prolapsing hemorrhoids in the elderly

Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

Volumn 17, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1990-1995

  Johnson, D B ^a   DiSiena, M R ^a   Fanelli, R D ^a  

^a BERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Elderly; Hemorrhoidal disease; Rectal mucosal prolapse; Stapled hemorrhoidectomy Longo procedure

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY SURGERY; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTICLE; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CARCINOID; CATHETERIZATION; CHRONIC PAIN; CIRCUMFERENTIAL MUCOSECTOMY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; EMERGENCY WARD; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEMORRHOID; HUMAN; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MALE; METASTASIS; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCTOPEXY; RECTUM MUCOSA; RECTUM SURGERY; SEDATION; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; SURGEON; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL STAPLING; SYMPTOM; TELEPHONE; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINE CATHETER; URINE RETENTION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; ANESTHESIA, LOCAL; ANESTHESIA, SPINAL; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; FEMALE; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMANS; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RECTAL PROLAPSE; SAFETY; SURGICAL STAPLING; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; URINARY RETENTION;

EID: 0345770465     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-8151-8     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Gabrielli F, Chiarelli M, Cioffi U, Guttadauro A, DeSimone M, DiMauro P, Arriciati A (2001) Day surgery for mucosal-hemorrhoidal prolapse using a circular stapler and modified regional anesthesia. Dis Colon Rectum 44: 842-844
2. Hayssen TK, Luchtefeld M, Senagore A (1999) Limited hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 42: 909-914
3. Hetzer FH, Dematines N, et al. (2002) Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long term results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 88: 669-674
4. Ho YK, Tsang C, et al. (2000) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy: cost and effectiveness. Randomized controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 1666-1675
5. Longo A (1988) Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal proplapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. Sixth World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Rome, Italy. Monduzzi, Bolonha, pp 777-784
6. Malloy RG, Kingsmore D (2000) Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy [letter]. Lancet 355: 810
7. Pavlidis T, Papaziogas B, et al. (2002) Modern stapled Longo procedure vs. conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 17: 50-53
8. Roswell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM (2000) Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355: 779-781
9. Senagore A (2002) Safety of stapled hemorrhoidectomy: Initial results from a multicenter trial. Annual Meeting, American Society for Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Chicago, June 7
10. Shalaby R, Dedoky A (2001) Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88: 1049-1053