Portfolio purposes and possibilities

Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 30-37

  Wolf, Kenneth ^a,b   Siu Runyan, Yvonne ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b University of Northern Colorado ^*  (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345769197     PISSN: 10813004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barnes, D. (1976). From communication to curriculum. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
2. Brewer, R. (1990). The development of portfolios in writing and mathematics for state-wide assessment in Vermont. Paper presented at the Institute on New Modes of Assessment, Cambridge, MA.
3. Cannell, J.J. (1987). National norm-referenced elementary achievement testing in America's public schools: How all fifty states are above the national average. Charleston WV: Friends of Education.
4. Clay, M.M. (1985). The early detection of reading difficulties. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
5. Dyson, A.H. (1993). Social worlds of children learning to write in an urban primary school. New York: Teachers College Press.
6. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
7. Flanagan, A. (1994, September). ELA teachers engaged in massive portfolio project. The Council Chronicle: The National Council of Teachers of English, pp. 1, 4-5.
8. Goodman, Y. (1991). Informal methods of evaluation. In J. Flood, J. Jensen, D. Lapp, & J. Squire (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (pp. 502-509). New York: Macmillan.
9. Graves, D.H., & Sunstein, B.S. (Eds.). (1992). Portfolio portraits. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
10. Haertel, E. (1990). Student achievement tests as tools of educational policy: Practices and consequences. In B.R. Gifford (Ed.), Test policy and test performance: Education, language, and culture (pp. 13-14). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
11. Hansen, J. (1992). Literacy portfolios: Helping students know themselves. Educational Leadership, 49, 66-68.
12. Heath, S.B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Herman, J., & Winters, L. (1994). Portfolio research: A slim collection. Educational Leadership, 52, 48-55.
14. McNeil, L. (1988). Contradictions of control. Part 2: Teachers, students, and curriculum. Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 433-438.
15. Paris, S.G., Lawton, T.A., Turner, J.C., & Roth, J.L. (1991). A developmental perspective on standardized achievement testing. Educational Researcher, 20, 12-20.
16. Resnick, L., & Resnick, D. (1992). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. In B.R. Gifford & M.C. O'Conner (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative view of aptitude, achievement, and instruction, (pp. 37-75). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
17. Slavin, R. (1988). Cooperative learning and student achievement. Educational Leadership, 45, 31-33.
18. Smith, M.L. (1991). Put to the test: The effects of external testing on teachers. Educational Researcher, 20, 8-11.
19. Tierney, R.J., Carter, M.A., & Desai, L.E. (1990). Portfolio assessment in the reading-writing classroom. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
20. Valencia, S., & Place, N. (1994). Literacy portfolios for teaching, learning, and accountability: The Bellevue Literacy Assessment Project. In S. Valencia, E. Hiebert, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Authentic reading assessment: Practices and possibilities (pp. 134-156). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
21. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Wolf, D.P. (1989). Portfolio assessment: Sampling student work. Educational Leadership, 46, 35-39.
23. Wolf, D.P. (1993). Assessment as an episode of learning. In R. Bennett and W. Ward (Eds.), Construction versus choice in cognitive measurement: Issues in constructed response, performance testing, and portfolio assessment (pp. 213-240). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Wolf, D.P., Bixby, J., Glenn, J., & Gardner, H. (1991). To use their minds well: Investigating new forms of student assessment. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of Research in Education (pp. 31-74). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.