Are busy people underor over-represented in national time budget surveys?

Loisir et Societe

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 573-582

  Paakkonen, Hannu ^a  

^a Statistics Finland   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345767358     PISSN: 07053436     EISSN: 17050154     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07053436.1998.10753672     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. ANACHKOVA, B., and PAAKKONEN, H. (1992). Description of the surveys. In L.M. Kirjavainen, B. Anachkova, S. Laaksonen, I, Niemi, H. Paakkonen, and Z. Staikov. Housework Time in Bulgaria and Finland. Helsinki: Statistics Finland, Studies No. 193.
2. GERSHUNY, J. (1990). International comparisons of time-budget surveys - methods and opportunities. In R. von Schweitzer, M. Ehling, D. Schafer. Zeitbudgeterhebungen. Ziele, Methoden und neue Konzepte. Stuttgart: Metzler-Poeschel.
3. HEISKANEN, M. (1996). The 1994 survey on living conditions. In S. Laaksonen (Ed.), International perspectives on nonresponse. Proceedings of the sixth international workshop on household survey nonresponse 25-27 October 1995. Helsinki: Statistics Finland, Research Reports 219.
4. HEISKANEN, M., and LAAKSONEN, S. (1996). Nonresponse and ill-being in the Finnish survey on living conditions. In S. Laaksonen (Ed.), International perspectives on nonresponse. Proceedings of the sixth international workshop on household survey nonresponse 25-27 October 1995. Helsinki: Statistics Finland, Research Reports 219.
5. HOCHSCHILD, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.
6. KANGASSALO, P. (1996). Household budget survey. In S. Laaksonen (Ed.), International perspectives on nonresponse. Proceedings of the sixth international workshop on household survey nonresponse 25-27 October 1995. Helsinki: Statistics Finland, Research Reports 219.
7. LAAKSONEN, S. (1996). The 1987-1988 time use survey. In S. Laaksonen (Ed.), Interna-tional perspectives on nonresponse. Proceedings of the sixth international work¬shop on household survey nonresponse 25-27 October 1995. Helsinki: Statistics Finland, Research Reports 219.
8. LAAKSONEN, S., and PAAKKONEN, H. (1992). Some methodological aspects on the use of time-budget survey data. In L.M. Kirjavainen, B. Anachkova, S. Laaksonen, I. Niemi, H. Paakkonen, and Z. Staikov. Housework time in Bulgaria and Finland. Helsinki: Statistics Finland, Studies No. 193.
9. NIEMI, I. (1993). Systematic error in behavioural measurement: Comparing results from interview and time-budget studies. Social Indicators Research, 30, 229-244.
10. ROBINSON, J.P. (1990). The time squeeze. American Demographics, February, 30-33.
11. ROBINSON, J.P., and BOSTROM, A. (1994). The overestimated workweek? What time diary measures suggest. Monthly Labor Review, 117, 11-23.
12. ROBINSON, J.P., and GODBEY, G. (1997). Time for life. The surprising ways Americans use their time. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
13. VAISANEN, P. (1990). The sampling design used in the study. In I. Niemi, and H. Paakkonen. Time use changes in Finland in the 1980s. Helsinki: Central Statistical Office of Finland, Studies 174.
14. TAYLOR, Tracy, School of Leisure and Tourism Studies, University of Technology, Sydney, P.O. Box 222, Lindfield, NSW, 2070, Australia
15. THIBAULT, Guy, Direction general des loisirs et des sports Etudes recherche et politiques, Ministere des affaires municipales, 20, rue Pierre Olivier Chauveau, Quebec (Quebec) G1R 4J3 Canada
16. THIBAULT, Lucie, School of Human Kinetics, University of British Columbia, 6081 University Blvd. Vancouver (British Columbia) V6T 1Z1 Canada
17. TREMBLAY, Diane-Gabrielle, Té1é Universite, Universite du Quebec, 1001, Sherbrooke Est C.P. 670 Succursale C, Montreal (Quebec) H2L 4L5 Canada
18. VEAL, Anthony, School of Leisure and Tourism Studies, University of Technology, Sydney, P.O. Box 222, Lindfield, NSW, 2070, Australia
19. ZUZANEK, Jiri, Recreation and Leisure Studies, University of Waterloo, Waterloo (Ontario) N2L 3G1 Canada