Tokamak-like confinement at a high beta and low toroidal field in the MST reversed field pinch

Nuclear Fusion

Volumn 43, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1684-1692

  Sarff, J S ^a   Almagri, A F ^a   Anderson, J K ^a   Biewer, T M ^a   Blair, A P ^a   Cengher, M ^a   Chapman, B E ^a   Chattopadhyay, P K ^a   Craig, D ^a   Den Hartog, D J ^a   Ebrahimi, F ^a   Fiksel, G ^a   Forest, C B ^a   Goetz, J A ^a   Holly, D ^a   Hudson, B ^a   Lovell, T W ^a   McCollam, K J ^a   Nonn, P D ^a   O'Connell, R ^a   Oliva, S P ^a   Prager, S C ^a   Reardon, J C ^a   Thomas, M A ^a   Wyman, M D ^a   Brower, D L ^b   Ding, W X ^b   Terry, S D ^b   Carter, M D ^c   Davydenko, V I ^d   Ivanov, A A ^d   Harvey, R W ^e   Pinsker, R I ^f   Xiao, C ^g   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b University of California   (United States)

^c OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d BUDKER INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS   (Russian Federation)

^e CompX ^*  (United States)

^f GENERAL ATOMICS   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CURRENT DENSITY; ELECTRON ENERGY LEVELS; ELECTROSTATICS; MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; MAGNETOPLASMA; PARTICLE BEAM INJECTION; PINCH EFFECT; PLASMA HEATING; PLASMA TURBULENCE; TOKAMAK DEVICES;

AC HELICITY INJECTION; DC CURRENT SUSTAINMENET; ELECTROSTATIC TURBULENCE; MAGNETIC FLUCTUATIONS; MAGNETIC TRANSPORTS; PLASMA CURRENT; RUNAWAY ELECTRON CONFINEMENT; TOKAMAK LIKE CONFINEMENT; TOROIDAL FIELD;

INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION;

EID: 0345761298     PISSN: 00295515     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/43/12/014     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Najmabadi F. et al 1990 The TITAN reversed field pinch reactor study - the final report UCLA Report UCLA-PPG-1200
2. Stoneking M.R. et al 1998 Phys. Plasmas 5 1004
3. Capello S. and Biskamp D. 1996 Nucl. Fusion 36 571
4. Capello S. and Paccagnella R. 1992 Phys. Fluids B 4 611
5. Finn J. et al 1992 Phys. Fluids B 4 1262
6. Martin P. et al 2003 Nucl. Fusion 43 1855
7. Sovinec C.R. and Prager S.C. 1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 777
8. Sarff J.S. et al 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 3670
9. Bartiromo R. et al 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 1492
10. Chapman B.E. et al 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 205001
11. Yagi Y. et al 2003 Phys. Plasmas 10 2925
12. Dexter R.N. et al 1991 Fusion Technol. 19 131
13. Chapman B.E. et al 2002 Phys. Plasmas 9 2061
14. Anderson J.K. et al Equilibrium reconstruction in the Madison Symmetric Torus reversed field pinch Nucl. Fusion submitted
15. Anderson J.K. et al 2003 Dynamo-free plasma in the reversed field pinch Phys. Rev. Lett. submitted
16. Brower D.L. et al 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 185005
17. Craig D.J. et al 2001 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72 1008
18. Den Hartog D.J. et al 2000 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 42 L47
19. ITER Physics Expert Groups on Confinement and Transport and Confinement Modeling and Database 1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 2175
20. O'Connell R. et al 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 045002
21. Harvey R.A. 1992 GA report GA-A20978
22. Biewer T.M. et al 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 045004
23. Schnack D.D. et al 1987 J. Comput. Phys. 70 330
24. Rechester A. and Rosenbluth M. 1978 Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 38
25. Nebel R.A., Schnack D.D. and Gianakon T.A. 2002 Phys. Plasmas 9 4968
26. Uchimoto et al 1994 Phys. Plasmas 1 3517
27. Forest C.B. et al 2000 Phys. Plasmas 7 1352
28. Bevir M.K. et al 1985 Phys. Fluids 28 1826
29. Schoenberg K.F. et al 1984 Phys. Fluids 27 2881
30. Ebrahimi F. et al 2003 Phys. Plasmas 10 999
31. Abdrashitov G.F. et al 2001 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72 594