Public Versus Private Information Systems: Do They Differ in Important Ways? A Review and Empirical Test

American Review of Public Administration

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 379-397

  Rocheleau, Bruce ^a   Wu, Liangfu ^b  

^a NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Downers Grove OB GYN Downers Grove   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345755597     PISSN: 02750740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/027507402237866     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aggarwal, A. K., & Mirani, R. (1999). DSS model usage in public and private sectors: Differences and implications. Journal of End User Computing, 11, 20-28.
2. Bajjaly, S. T. (1998). Strategic information systems planning in the public sector. American Review of Public Administration, 28, 76-86.
3. Bozeman, B. (1987). All organizations are public. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Bozeman, B., & Bretschneider, S. (1986). Public management information systems: Theory and prescription. Public Administration Review, 46, 475-487.
5. Bozeman, B., & Kingsley, G. (1998). Risk culture in public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 58, 109-118.
6. Bozeman, B., Reed, P. N., & Scott, P. (1992). Red tape and task delays in public and private organizations. Administration & Society, 24(93), 290-322.
7. Bretschneider, S. (1990). Management information systems in public and private organizations: An empirical test. Public Administration Review, 50, 536-545.
8. Bretschneider, S., & Wittmer, D. (1993). Organizational adoption of microcomputer technology: The role of sector. Information Systems Research, 4, 88-108.
9. Buchanan, B. (1974). Government managers, business executives, and organizational commitment. Public Administration Review, 34, 339-347.
10. Caudle, S. L. (1996). Strategic information resources management: Fundamental practices. Government Information Quarterly. 13, 83-97.
11. Caudle, S. L., Gor, W. L., & Newcomer, K. E. (1991). Key information systems management issues for the public sector. MIS Quarterly, 15, 171-188.
12. Center for Technology in Government. (1996). Making smart IT choices. Retrieved August 28, 2002, from http://www.ctg.albany.edu/resources/smartin.html
13. Coursey, D., & Bozeman, B. (1990). Decision making in public and private organizations: A test of alternative concepts of publicness. Public Administration Review, 50, 525-535.
14. Coursey, D., & Killingsworth, J. (2000). Managing government Web services in Florida: Issues and lessons. In G. David Carson (Ed.), Handbook of public management information systems (pp. 331-343). New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
15. Cronk, J., & Sharp, J. (1998). A framework for IS outsourcing strategy in private and public sector contexts. In L. P. Willcocks & M. C. Lacity (Eds.), Strategic sourcing of information systems (pp. 163-185). New York: John Wiley.
16. Culpan, O. (1995). Attitudes of end-users towards information technology in manufacturing and service industries. Information & Management, 28, 167-176.
17. Douglas, M. (2001, September). Building blocks. Government Technology, pp. 24-25.
18. Elliot, R. H., & Tevavichulada, S. (1999). Computer literacy and human resource management: A public/private sector comparison. Public Personnel Management, 28, 259-274.
19. Fletcher, C. N., & Lorenz, F. O. (1985, April). Structural influences on the relationship between objective and subjective indicators of well-being. Social Indicators Research, 16, 333-345.
20. Fletcher, P. T., Bretschneider, S. I., & Marchand, D. A. (1992). Managing information technology: Transforming county governments in the 1990s. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, School of Information Studies.
21. George, J. F., & Theis, J. W. (1991). Microcomputer training: Do trained users differ from non-trained users? Data Base, 22, 1-10.
22. Hougland, J. G, (1987). Criteria for client evaluation of public programs: A comparison of objective and perceptual measures. Social Science Quarterly. 68, 386-394.
23. Lee, M. (2001). The missing link: State profiles of the chief information officer (The Maxwell School, Syracuse University, Governmental Performance Project, Learning Paper Series, May). Retrieved August 28, 2002. from http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/gpp/Publications/Working_papers/ CIO%20Learntng%20Paper.pdf
24. Lindberg, D. A. B. (1979). The growth of medical information systems in the United States. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
25. McGee, M. K. (1997. March 17). Connecticut proposes outsourcing, Informationweek, p. 22.
26. Miller, B. (1994). Lessons from Florida's public assistance automation. Government Technology 7, 1, 42.
27. Mohan, L., Holstein, W. K., & Adams, R. B. (1990, December). EIS: It can work in the public sector. M/S Quarterly, pp. 435-448.
28. Morgan, T. P. (1998, September). Ecommerce options. Global Technology Business, pp. 40-42.
29. Newcombe, T. (1996, June). Web makes economic sense. Government Technology. Retrieved from http://www.govtech.net/publtcations/gt/1996/June/trends2june.shtm
30. Norberg, A., O'Neill, J. E., & Freedman, K. (1996). Transforming computer technology: Information processing for the Pentagon, 1962-1986. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
31. Nutt, P. C. (1999). Public-private differences and the assessment of alternatives for decision making. Journal of Public Administration Theory and Research. 9, 305-350.
32. Porter, M., & Millar, V. E. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63(4), 149-160.
33. Rainey, H. G. (1983). Public agencies and private firms: Incentives, goals, and individual roles. Administration & Society, 15, 207-242.
34. Rainey, H. G., Backoff, R. W., & Levine, C. H. (1976). Comparing public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 36, 233-244.
35. Rainey, H. G., Pandey, S. K., & Boreman, B. (1995). Public and private managers perceptions of red tape. Public Administration Review, 55, 567-574.
36. Reed, B. J. (2001). Strategic information systems planning in U.S. state governments: States and prospects indicated by quantitative analysis of Year 2000 government performance project data (The Maxwell School, Syracuse University, Governmental Performance Project, Learning Paper Series, August). Retrieved from http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/gpp/Publiaitions/Working_papers/Strategic_ Info_Systems.pdf
37. Rocheleau, B. (2000). Guidelines for public-sector systems acquisition. In G. D. Garson (Ed.), Handbook of public sector information systems (pp. 377-390). New York: Marcel Dekker.
38. Singer, L. (1995, December). IT outsourcing: Wisconsin and Indiana compared. Government Technology, pp. 104-105.
39. Steen, M. (1998, June 22). The training imperative. Infoworld, pp. 78-82.
40. Traska, M. R. (1988). Managed care: Whoever has the data wins the game. Hospitals, 62(5), 50-56.
41. Varon, E. (2000, August 1). Uncle Sam wants you. CIO. pp. 132-144.
42. Venkatraman. N. (1997, spring). Beyond outsourcing: Managing IT resources as a value center. Sloan Management Review, 38, 51-64.
43. Wahl, M. (1998, November 8). Sizing up customers: Are you happy with our bank? More and more, that may depend on how happy your bank is with you. Chicago Tribune, Business Section, p. 1.
44. West, D. (2001, August 30-September 2). E-governtment and the transformation of public sector service delivery. Paper prepared for delivery at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
45. Whiting, R. (2000, May 8). Web data piles up. Information-week, pp. 50-64.
46. Whiting, R., & Davis, B. (1999, August 23). More on the edge. Infarmationweek, pp. 36-48.
47. Wu, L. (1999). A comparative study: End-user training in public and private organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb.