DIF detection using Logistic Discriminant Analysis and Polytomous Logistic Regression;Comparación de la eficacia de regresión logística politómica y análisis discriminante logístico en la detección del DIF no uniforme

Psicothema

Volumn 12, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2000, Pages 298-300

  Hidalgo Montesinos, Ma Dolores ^a   Gómez Benito, Juana ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345752780     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Agresti, A. (1984). Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data. New York, NY: Wiley.
2. Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical Data Analysis. New York, NY: Wiley.
3. Angoff, W.H. (1993). Perspectives on differential item functioning methodology. En P.W. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential Item Functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Cohen, A.S., Kim, S.H. y Baker, E. (1993). Detection of differential item functioning in the graded response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 335-350.
5. De Ayala, R.J., Kim, S.H., Stapleton, L.M. y Dayton, C. (1999). A Reconceptualization of Differential Item Functioning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
6. French, A.W. y Miller, T.R. (1996). Logistic Regression and its use in detecting differential item functioning in polytomous items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 33, 315-332.
7. Gómez, J. e Hidalgo, M.D. (1997a). Evaluación del funcionamiento diferencial en items dicotómicos: Una revisión metodológica. Anuario de Psicología, 74, 3-32.
8. th European Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
9. Hidalgo, M.D. (1995). Evaluación del funcionamiento diferencial del ítem en ítems dicotómicos y politómicos: Un estudio comparativo. Tesis Doctoral no publicada. Murcia: Universidad de Murcia.
10. Hidalgo, M.D. y Gómez, J. (1999). Técnicas de detección de funcionamiento diferencial en ítems politómicos. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 1, 39-60.
11. Hosmer, D.W. y Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied Logistic Regression. New York, NY: Wiley.
12. Mellenbergh, G.J. (1982). Contingency table models for assessing item bias. Journal of Educational Statistics, 7, 105-108.
13. Miller, T.R. y Spray, J.A. (1993). Logistic discriminant function analysis for DIF identification of polytomously scored items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30, 107-122.
14. Millsap, R.E. y Everson, H.T. (1993). Methodology Review: Statistical approaches for assessing measurement bias. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 297-334.
15. Potenza, M.T. y Dorans, N.J. (1995). DIF assessment for polytomously scored items: A framework for classification and evaluation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 23-37.
16. Rogers, H.J. y Swaminathan, H. (1993). A comparison of Logistic Regression and Mantel-Haenszel procedures for detecting differential item functioning. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 105-116.
17. Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometric Monograph Supplement, 17.
18. Swaminathan, H. y Rogers, H.J. (1990). Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 361-370.