Comparison of two test purification procedures to assess DIF with Lord's statistic and Raju's area measures;Comparación de dos procedimientos de purificación del test para la evaluación del FDI con el estadístico de Lord y con las medidas de área de Raju

Psicothema

Volumn 12, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2000, Pages 399-402

  Núñez, Rosa Ma ^a   Hidalgo, Ma Dolores ^a   López, José Antonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345752773     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Baker, F.B. (1993). EQUATE v. 2.0: A computer program for the characteristic curve method of IRT equating. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 20.
2. Candell, G.L. y Drasgow, F. (1988). An iterative procedure for linking metrics and assessing item bias in item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 253-260.
3. Gómez, J. e Hidalgo, M.D. (1997). Evaluación del funcionamiento diferencial en ítems dicotómicos: una revisión metodológica. Anuario de Psicología, 74, 3-32.
4. Hidalgo, M.D. y López, J.A. (1995). SIMULA 2.0: Un programa para la simulación de vectores de respuesta al ítem. Demostración de software presentada al IV Symposium de Metodología de las CC. del Comportamiento, La Manga, Murcia.
5. Hidalgo, M.D. y López, J.A. (1997). Detección del DIF en ítems politómicos e igualación iterativa: comparación entre las medidas de área de Raju y el estadístico de Lord. Comunicación presentada en el V Congreso de Metodología de las CC. Humanas y Sociales, Sevilla.
6. Kim, S.H. y Cohen, A.S. (1992). IRTDIF: A computer program for IRT differential item functioning analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 158.
7. Lautenschlager, G.J., Flaherty, V.L. y Park, D. (1994). IRT differential item functioning: An examination of ability scale purifications. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 21-31.
8. Lord, F.M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Miller, M.D. y Oshima, T.C. (1992). Effect of sample sizes, number of biased items and magnitude of bias on a two-stage item bias estimation method. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 381-388.
10. Millsap, R.E. y Everson, H.T. (1993). Methodology review: Statistical approaches for assessing mesurement bias. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 297-334.
11. Mislevy, R.J. y Bock, R.D. (1990). PC-BILOG 3.04: Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
12. Park, D. y Lautenschlager, G.J. (1990). Improving IRT item bias detection with iterative linking and ability scale purification. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 163-173.
13. Raju, N.S. (1988). The area between two item characteristic curves. Psychometrika, 53, 492-502.
14. Raju, N.S. (1990). Determining the significance of estimated signed and unsigned areas between two item response functions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 197-207.
15. Stocking, M.L. y Lord, F.M. (1983). Developing a common metric in item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 201-210.
16. Wilkinson, L. (1990). SYSTAT: The system for Statistics (versión 5). Evanston, IL: Systat Corporation.