Brain Imaging as a Predictor of Early Functional Outcome Following Traumatic Brain Injury in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults

Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 493-503

  Blackman, James A ^a,c   Rice, Sydney A ^a   Matsumoto, Julie A ^b   Conaway, Mark R ^b   Elgin, Kevin M ^c   Patrick, Peter D ^a   Farrell, Walter J ^c   Allaire, Janet H ^a   Willson, Douglas F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Functional outcome; Neuroimaging; Rehabilitation; Traumatic brain injury; WeeFIM

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; BRAIN INJURY; BRAIN STEM; CEREBELLUM; CHILD; COGNITION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INJURY SCALE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; PROGNOSIS; REHABILITATION CENTER; SELF CARE; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 0345714582     PISSN: 08859701     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001199-200311000-00003     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Traumatic brain injuries. [Internet communication]. 2000.
2. Berger MS, Pitts LH, Lovely M, Edwards MS, Bartkowski HM. Outcome from severe head injury in children and adolescents. J Neurosurg. 1985;62(2):194-199.
3. Michaud LJ, Rivara FP, Grady MS, Reay DT. Predictors of survival and severity of disability after severe brain injury in children. Neurosurgery. 1992;31(2):254-264.
4. Kraus JF, Rock A, Hemyari P. Brain injuries among infants, children, adolescents and young adults. Am J Dis Child. 1990;144:684-691.
5. Bigler ED. Neuroimaging in pediatric traumatic head injury: diagnostic considerations and relationships to neurobehavioral outcome. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1999;14(4):406-423.
6. Bruce DA, Alavi A, Bilaniuk L, et al. Diffuse cerebral swelling following head injuries in children: the syndrome of 'malignant brain edema.' J Neurosurg. 1981;54:170-178.
7. Paterakis KKAH, Komnos A, Volikas Z. Outcome of patients with diffuse axonal injury: the significance and prognostic value of MRI in the acute phase. J Trauma. 2000;49(6):1071-1075.
8. van der Naalt J, Hew JM, van Zomeren AH, Sluiter WJ, Minderhound JM. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in mild to moderate head injury: early and late imaging related to outcome. Ann Neurol. 1999;46(1):70-78.
9. Kraus JF, Fife D, Conroy C. Pediatric brain injuries: the nature, clinical course, and early outcomes in a defined United States population. Pediatrics 1987;79:501-507.
10. Wilson JTL, Wiedmann KD, Hadley D, Condon B, Teasdale G, Brooks DN. Early and late magnetic resonance imaging and neuropsycholgical outcome after head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988;51:391-396.
11. Kampfl A, Franz G, Aichner F, et al. The persistent vegetative state after closed head injury: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings in 42 patients. J Neurosurg. 1998;88:809-816.
12. Jenkins A, Teasdale G, Hadley MD, Macpherson P, Rowan JO. Brain lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging in mild and severe head injury. Lancet. 1986;2(8504):445-446.
13. Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, et al. A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. J Neurosurg. 1991;75:S14-S20.
14. Koelfen W, Freund M, Dinter D, Schmidt S, Koenig S, Schultze C. Long-term follow up of children with head injuries-classified as "good recovery" using the Glasgow Outcome Scale: neurological, neuropsychological and magnetic imaging results. Eur J Pediatr. 1997;156:230-235.
15. Ommaya AK, Gennarelli TA. Cerebral concussion and traumatic unconsciousness. Brain. 1974;97:633-654.
16. Grados MA, Slomine BS, Gerring JP, Vasa R, Bryan N, Deckla MB. Depth of lesion model in children and adolescents with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: use of SPGR MRI to predict severity and outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70:350-358.
17. Levin HS, Mendelsohn D, Lilly MA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in relation to functional outcome of pediatric closed head injury: a test of the Ommaya-Gennarelli model. Neurosurgery. 1997;40(3):432-440.
18. Wilson JTL, Wiedmann KD, Hadley DM, Condon B, Teasdale G, Brooks DN. Early and late magnetic resonance imaging and neuropsychological outcome after head injury. J Neurol. 1988;51:391-396.
19. Gean AD, Kates RS, Lee S. Neuroimaging in head injury. New Horiz. 1995;3(3):549-561.
20. sm Clinical Guide. Version 5.01. Buffalo, NY: University of Buffalo, 1998.
21. Msall ME, DiGaudio K, Duffy LC, et al. Normative sample of an instrument for tracking functional independence in children. Clin Pediatr. 1994;33:431-438.
22. Msall ME. Functional assessment in neurodevelopmental disability. In: Capute AJ, Accardo PJ, eds. Developmental Disabilities in Infancy and Childhood. Baltimore: Paul Brookes Publishing, 1996:371-392.
23. Ottenbacher KJ, Msall ME, Lyon N, Duffy LC, Braun S, Granger CV. Measuring developmental and functional status in children with disabilities: comparison of the Functional Independence Measure for Children, Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales and Battelle Developmenal Inventory Screening Test. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1999;41(3):186-194.
24. Massagli TL, Michaud LJ, Rivara FP. Association between injury indices and oucome after severe traumatic brain injury in children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:125-132.
25. Msall ME, DiGaudio KM, Duffy LC. Use of functional assessment in children with developmental disabilities. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 1993;4(3):517-527.
26. Deutsch A, Braun S, Granger CV. The Functional Independence Measure (FIM Instrument) and the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM Instrument): ten years of development. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med. 1996;8(4):267-281.
27. Ottenbacher KJ, Msall ME, Lyon N, Duffy LC, Granger CV, Braun S. Interrater agreement and stability of the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM): use in children with developmental disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:1309-1315.
28. Olejnik S, Algina J. Measures of effect size for comparative studies: applications, interpretations, and limitations. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000;25:241-286.
29. Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation [including the FIM™ instrument]. Version 5.1. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo; 1997.
30. Teasdale GM, Graham DI. Craniocerebral trauma: protection and retrieval of the neuronal population after injury. Neurosurgery. 1998;43(4):723-738.
31. Robertson CS, Valadka AB, Hannay HJ, et al. Prevention of secondary ischemic insults after severe head injury. Crit Care Med. 1999;27(10):2086-2095.