Categorisation practices across professional boundaries: Some analytic insights from genetic counselling

Applied Linguistics and Communities of Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 150-168

  Sarangi, Srikant ^a   Clarke, Angus ^b   Bennert, Kristina ^a   Howell, Lucy ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WALES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345706095     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Buttny, R. (1996) Clients’ and therapist’s joint construction of the clients’ problems. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29, 2: 125-153.
2. Ferrara, K.W. (1994) Therapeutic Ways with Words. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Gale, J. E. (1991) Conversation Analysis ofTherapeutic Discourse:Tlie Pursuit of a Ttierapeutic Agenda. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4. Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis. London: Penguin Press
5. Goodwin, C. (1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 3: 606-633.
6. Grossen, M. and Apotheloz, D. (1996) Communication about communication in a therapeutic interview. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 2: 101-132.
7. Labov, W. and Fanshel, D. (1977) Ttierapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York, London: Academic Press.
8. Maseide, P. (1987) The permanent context construction: A neglected dimension of therapeutic discourse. Text, 7, 1: 67-87.
9. McAllister, M. (2002) Predictive genetic testing and beyond: A theory of engagement. Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 5: 491-508.
10. McNamee, S. and Gergen, K. J. (1992) (eds) Ttierapy as Social Construction. London: Sage.
11. Miller, G. and Silverman, D. (1995) Troubles Talk and Counseling Discourse. A Comparative Study. The Sociological Quarterly, 36, 4: 725-747.
12. Roberts, C. and Sarangi, S. (2002) Mapping and assessing medical students’ interactional involvement styles with patients. In K. Spelman-Miller and P.Thompson (eds) Unity and Diversity in Language Use. London: Continuum.
13. Roberts, C. and Sarangi, S. (2003) Uptake of discourse research in interprofessional settings:reporting from medical consultancy. Special issue of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3: 338-359.
14. Sarangi, S. (2000) Activity types, discourse types and interactional hybridity: the case of genetic counselling. In S. Sarangi and M. Coulthard (eds) Discourse and Social Life. London:Pearson, pp. 1-27.
15. Sarangi, S. (2002) Discourse practitioners as a community of interprofessional practice: some insights from health communication research. In C. N. Candlin (ed.) Research and Practice in Professional Discourse. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press, pp. 95-135.
16. Sarangi, S. and Candlin, C. N. (2001) ‘Motivational relevancies’: some methodological reflections on the social theoretical and sociolinguistic practice. In N. Coupland, S. Sarangi and C. N. Candlin (eds) Sociolinguistics and Social Theory. London: Pearson, pp. 350-388.
17. Sarangi, S. and Clarke, A. (2002a) Constructing an account by contrast in counselling for childhood genetic testing. Social Science and Medicine, 54: 295-308.
18. Sarangi, S. and Clarke, A. (2002b) Zones of expertise and the management of uncertainty in genetics risk communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35, 2: 139-172.
19. Sarangi, S., Bennert, K., Howell, L. and Clarke, A. (2003) ‘Relatively speaking’: Relativisation of genetic risk in counselling for predictive testing. Health, Risk and Society, 5, 2: 155-170.
20. Sarangi, S. and Roberts, C. (1999) Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
21. Turner, R. (1972) Some Formal Properties of Therapy Talk. In D. Sudnow (ed.) Studies in Social Interaction. New York: Free Press, pp. 367-397.