Clinical significance of 3D reconstruction of arteriovenous malformation using digital subtraction angiography and its modification with CT information in stereotactic radiosurgery

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

Volumn 57, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 1392-1399

  Zhang, Xiao Qing ^a,b   Shirato, Hiroki ^b   Aoyama, Hidefumi ^b   Ushikoshi, Satoshi ^b   Nishioka, Takeshi ^b   Zhang, Da Zhen ^b   Miyasaka, Kazuo ^b  

^a SECOND MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Arteriovenous malformation; CT; Digital subtraction angiography; MRI; Three dimensional reconstruction

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; RADIOTHERAPY; SURGERY;

DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY (DSA);

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT CODING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOSURGERY; SCHOOL CHILD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY; THICKNESS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0345689422     PISSN: 03603016     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00780-6     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Flickinger J.C., Pollock B.E., Kondziolka D., et al. A dose-response analysis of arteriovenous malformation obliteration after radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 36:1996;873-879.
2. Schlienger M., Atlan D., Lefkopoulos D., et al. LINAC radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations Results in 169 patients . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 46:2000;1135-1142.
3. Shin M., Kawamoto S., Kurita H., et al. Retrospective analysis of a 10-year experience of stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations in children and adolescents. J Neurosurg. 97:2002;779-784.
4. Flickinger J.C., Kondziolka D., Lunsford L.D., et al. A multi-institutional analysis of complication outcomes after arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 44:1999;67-74.
5. Flickinger J.C., Kondziolka D., Maitz A.H., et al. Analysis of neurological sequelae from radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations How location affects outcome . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 40:1998;273-278.
6. Flickinger J.C., Kondziolka D., Pollock B.E., et al. Complications from arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery Multivariate analysis and risk modeling . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 38:1997;485-490.
7. Flickinger J.C., Kondziolka D., Maitz A.H., et al. An analysis of the dose-response for arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery and other factors affecting obliteration. Radiother Oncol. 63:2002;347-354.
8. Gallina P., Merienne L., Meder J.F., et al. Failure in radiosurgery treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery. 42:1998;996-1004.
9. Pollock B.E., Flickinger J.C., Lunsford L.D., et al. Factors associated with successful arteriovenous malformations radiosurgery. Neurosurgery. 42:1998;1239-1247.
10. Colombo F., Pozza F., Chierego G., et al. Linear accelerator radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations An update . Neurosurgery. 34:1994;14-21.
11. Bova F.J., Friedman W.A. Stereotactic angiography An inadequate database for radiosurgery? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 20:1991;891-895.
12. Ogilvy C.S., Stieg P.E., Awad I., et al. Recommendations for the management of intracranial arteriovenous malformations A statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Stroke Association . Circulation. 103:2001;2644-2657.
13. Theodorou K., Kappas C., Gaboriaud G., et al. A simple method for 3D lesion reconstruction from two projected angiographic images Implementation to a stereotactic radiotherapy treatment planning system . Radiother Oncol. 43:1997;281-284.
14. Soderman M., Karlsson B., Launnay L., et al. Volume measurement of cerebral arteriovenous malformations from angiography. Neuroradiology. 42:2000;697-702.
15. Coste E., Gibon D., Leclercq X., et al. 3D reconstruction of the encapsulating contour of arteriovenous malformations for radiosurgery using digital subtraction angiography. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 50:2001;247-255.
16. Foroni R., Gerosa M., Pasqualin A., et al. Shape recovery and volume calculation from biplane angiography in the stereotactic radiosurgical treatment of arteriovenous malformations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 35:1996;565-577.
17. Siddon R.L., Barth N.H. Stereotaxic localization of intracranial targets. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 13:1987;1241-1246.
18. Aoyama H., Shirato H., Nishioka T., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging system for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and its impact on gross tumor volume delineation of central nervous system tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 50:2001;821-827.
19. Phillips M.H., Kessler M., Chuang F.Y.S., et al. Image correlation of MRI and CT in treatment planning for radiosurgery of intracranial vascular malformations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 20:1991;881-889.
20. Vates G.E., Lawton M.T., Wilson C.B., et al. Magnetic source imaging demonstrates altered cortical distribution of function in patients with arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery. 51:2002;614-623.
21. Kondziolka D., Lunsford L.D., Kanal E., et al. Stereotactic magnetic resonance angiography for targeting in arteriovenous malformations radiosurgery. Neurosurgery. 35:1994;585-591.
22. Bednarz G., Downes B., Werner-Wasik M., et al. Combining stereotactic angiography and 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in treatment planning for arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 46:2000;1149-1154.
23. Kunieda E., Kawaguchi O., Onozuka S., et al. Intra-arterial CT-angiography for cerebral arteriovenous malformation - initial experiences for treatment planning of radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 54:2002;1121-1133.