Neural Mechanisms for Response Selection: Representation Specific or Modality Independent?

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 15, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1077-1079

  Schumacher, Eric H ^a   Jiang, Yuhong ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; EXPERIMENTATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NERVE CONDUCTION; NERVE POTENTIAL; NERVE TRACT; NOTE; OBSERVER VARIATION; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PARIETAL LOBE; PERCEPTION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DESIGN; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0345687396     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/089892903322598058     Document Type: Note

References (13)

1. D'Esposito, M., Ballard, D., Aguirre, G. K., & Zarahn, E. (1998). Human prefrontal cortex is not specific for working memory: A functional MRI study. Neuroimage, 8, 274-282.
2. Haxby, J. V., Gobbini, M. I., Furey, M. L., Ishai, A., Schouten, J. L., & Pietrini, P. (2001). Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science, 293, 2425-2430.
3. Jiang, Y., & Kanwisher, N. (2003a). Common neural substrates for response selection across modalities and mapping paradigms. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1082-1094.
4. Jiang, Y., & Kanwisher, N. (2003b). Common neural mechanisms for response selection and perceptual attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1095-1110.
5. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
6. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3-65.
7. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks - Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
8. Schumacher, E. H., & D'Esposito, M. (2002). Neural implementation of response selection in humans as revealed by localized effects of stimulus-response compatibility on brain activation. Human Brain Mapping, 17, 193-201.
9. Schumacher, E. H., Elston, P. A., & D'Esposito, M. (2003). Neural evidence for representation-specific response selection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1111-1121.
10. Schumacher, E. H., Lauber, E. J., Glass, J., Zurbriggen, E., Gmeindl, L., Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (1999). Concurrent response-selection processing in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 791-814.
11. Spiridon, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2002). How distributed is visual category information in human occipito-temporal cortex? An fMRI study. Neuron, 35, 1157-1165.
12. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
13. Welford, A. T. (1959). Evidence of a single-channel decision mechanism limiting performance in a serial reaction task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 193-210.