Labeling Biotech Foods: Opening Pandora's Box?

Food Technology

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 38-42

  Korwek, Edward L ^a  

^a LLP   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345657800     PISSN: 00156639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Alliance for Biointegrity v. Shalala. 1998. D.C. District Court, Civ. No. 98-1300.
2. EU. 1998. Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1139/98.
3. EU. 2000. Commission Regulation (EC) No. 49/2000.
4. FDA. 1988. Irradiation in the production, processing, and handling of food. Final rule. Fed. Reg. 53: 53176.
5. FDA. 1992. Statement of policy: Foods derived from new plant varieties. Fed. Reg. 54: 22984.
6. FDA. 1993. Food labeling; Foods derived from new plant varieties. Fed. Reg. 58: 25837.
7. FDA. 1994. Interim guidance on voluntary labeling of milk and milk products from cows that have not been treated with recombinant bovine somatotropin. Fed. Reg. 54: 6279.
8. FDA. 1995. Dealcoholized wine and malt beverages labeling. Compliance policy guideline 7101.04: section 510.400.
9. FDA. 1999a. Biotechnology in the year 2000 and beyond; Public meetings. Fed. Reg. 64: 57470.
10. FDA. 1999b. Protein hydrolysates. Code of Fed. Regs. Title 21, section 102.22.
11. FDA. 1999c. Olestra. Code of Fed. Regs. Title 21, section 172.867.
12. FDA. 1999d. Asiago fresh and asiago soft cheese. Code of Fed. Regs. Title 21, section 133.102.
13. FDA. 1999e. Vanilla extract. Code of Fed. Regs. Title 21, section 169.175.
14. FDA. 1999f. Foods; Labeling of spices, flavorings, colorings and chemical preservatives. Code of Fed. Regs. Title 21, section 101.22.
15. H.R. 3377. 1999. Genetically Engineered Food Right to Know Act. 106 Cong., 1st Session.
16. Klee, K. 1999. "Frankenstein Foods?" Newsweek, p. 33.
17. Korwek, E.L. 1997. "What is Biotechnology?" In "U.S. 1997 Biotechnology Regulations Handbook," ed. E.L. Korwek, p. xxv. Food and Drug Law Inst., Washington, D.C.
18. OTA. 1984. Commercial biotechnology: An international analysis, p. 3. Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, D.C.
19. Pearson v. Shalala. 1999. D.C. Court of Appeals, 164 F.3d 650.
20. U.S. v. An Article . . . Sudden Change. 1969. 2d Cir. Court of Appeals, 402. F.2d 734.
21. USDA. 1991. Livestock and poultry connected with biotechnology research. Fed. Reg. 56: 67054.