Inertial Eigenvectors Play a Role in Proprioception: Comment on Craig and Bourdin (2002)

Ecological Psychology

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 229-240

  Riley, Michael A ^a   Pagano, Christopher C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345581451     PISSN: 10407413     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15326969ECO1503_3     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Anderson, K. L., & Turvey, M. T (1998, May). Inertial eigenvalues may influence perceived reach. Poster presented at the North American spring meeting of the International Society for Ecological Psychology, Hartford, CT.
2. Bongers, R. M. (2001). An action perspective on tool use and its development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
3. Burton, G., & McGowan, J. (1997). Contact and posture in nonvisual judgment of gap crossability. Ecological Psychology, 9, 323-354.
4. Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (2000). Rotational invariants and dynamic touch. In M. A. Heller (Ed.), Touch, representation, and blindness (pp. 27-66). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
5. Clark, F. J., & Burgess, P. R. (1975). Slowly adapting receptors in cat knee joint: Can they signal joint angle? Journal of Neurophysiology, 38, 1448-1463.
6. Clark, F. J., & Horch, K. W. (1986). Kinesthesia. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 13-1-13-62). New York: Wiley.
7. Craig, C. M., & Bourdin, C. (2001). Revisited: The inertia tensor as a proprioceptive invariant in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 317, 106-110.
8. Darling, W. G., & Hondzinski, J. M. (1999). Kinesthetic perceptions of earth- and body-fixed axes. Experimental Brain Research, 126, 417-430.
9. Eklund, G. (1972). Position sense and state of contraction: The effects of vibration. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 35, 606-611.
10. Feldman, A. G., & Latash, M. L. (1982). Interaction of afferent and efferent signals underlying joint position sense: Empirical and theoretical approaches. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14, 174-193.
11. Garrett, S. R., Pagano, C., Austin, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1998). Spatial and physical frames of reference in positioning a limb. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1206-1215.
12. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
13. Goodwin, G. M., McCloskey, D. I., & Matthews, P. B. C. (1972). The contribution of muscle afferents to kinesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralyzing joint afferents. Brain, 95, 705-748.
14. Grigg, P., Finerman, G. A., & Riley, L. H. (1973). Joint-position sense after total hip replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 55A, 1016-1025.
15. Grigg, P., & Greenspan, B. J. (1977). Response of primate joint afferent neurons to mechanical stimulation of knee joint. Journal of Neurophysiobgy, 40, 1-8.
16. Matthews, P. B. C. (1982). Where does Sherrington's "muscular sense" originate? Muscles, joints, corollary discharges? Annual Review of Neuroscience, 5, 189-218.
17. McCloskey, D. I. (1978). Kinesthetic sensibility. Psychological Review, 58, 763-820.
18. Millikan, R. (1984). Language, thought, and other biological categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Millikan, R. (1993). White queen psychology and other essays for Alice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Pagano, C., & Cabe, P. A. (2003), Constancy in dynamic touch: Length perceived by dynamic touch is invariant over changes in media. Ecological Psychology, 15, 1-17.
21. Pagano, C., & Donahue, K. G. (1999). Perceiving the lengths of rods wielded in different media. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1336-1344.
22. Pagano, C., Fitzpatrick, P., & Turvey, M. T. (1993). Tensorial basis to the constancy of perceived object extent over variations in dynamic touch. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 43-54.
23. Pagano, C., Garrett, S. R., & Turvey, M. T. (1996). Is limb proprioception a function of the limbs' inertial eigenvectors? Ecological Psychology, 8, 43-69.
24. Pagano, C., & Turvey, M. T. (1992). Eigenvectors of the inertia tensor and perceiving the orientation of a hand-held object by dynamic touch. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 617-624.
25. Pagano, C., & Turvey, M. T. (1995). The inertia tensor as a basis for the perception of limb orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1070-1087.
26. Pagano, C., & Turvey, M. T. (1998). Eigenvectors of the inertia tensor and perceiving the orientation of limbs and objects. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 14, 331-359.
27. Riley, M. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2001). Inertial constraints on limb proprioception are independent of visual calibration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 438-455.
28. Roll, R., Gilhodes, J. C., Roll, J. P., Popov, K., Charade, O., & Gurfinkel, V. (1998). Proprioceptive information processing in weightlessness. Experimental Brain Research, 122, 393-402.
29. Skoglund, S. (1973). Joint receptors and kinaesthesis. In A. Iggo (Ed.), Handbook of sensory physiology (Vol. 2, pp. 111-136). New York: Springer-Verlag.
30. Solomon, H. Y., & Turvey, M. T. (1988). Haptically perceiving the distances reachable with hand-held objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 404-427.
31. Turvey, M. T. (1996). Dynamic touch. American Psychologist, 51, 1134-1152.
32. Turvey, M. T., Burton, O., Pagano, C. C., Solomon, H. Y., & Runeson, S. (1992). Role of the inertia tensor in perceiving object orientation by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception and Performance, 18, 714-727.
33. Turvey, M. T., Shockley, K. D., & Carello, C. (1999). Affordance, proper function, and the physical basis of perceived heaviness. Cognition, 73, B17-B26.
34. Wagman, J. B., Shockley, K., Riley, M. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2001). Attunement, calibration, and exploration in fast haptic perceptual learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 323-327.