Determination of the effect of exposure to gasoline components on a high density polyethylene geomembrane using the comprehensive test system

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 75-93

  Barrett Jr , William Martin ^a   Stessel, Richard Ian ^b  

^a HSA Engineering   (United States)

^b Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science   (United States)

Author keywords

Fuel wastes; Geomembranes; Landfill; Liner; Testing

Indexed keywords

COMPREHENSIVE TEST SYSTEMS (CTS); ETHYLBENZENE; FUEL WASTES;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; BENZENE; GASOLINE; GEOMEMBRANES; HEALTH RISKS; HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENES; LANDFILL LININGS; LUBRICATING OILS; RISK PERCEPTION; SYNTHETIC RUBBER; TOLUENE; XYLENE;

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS;

BENZENE; ETHYLBENZENE; FUEL OIL; GASOLINE; POLYETHYLENE; RUBBER; TOLUENE; XYLENE;

APPARATUS; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ENVIRONMENT; COMPREHENSION; DENSITY; HAZARDOUS WASTE; HEALTH HAZARD; LABORATORY; LANDFILL; MECHANICAL STRESS; MEMBRANE; MOTOR VEHICLE; PRESSURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; TECHNIQUE;

GASOLINE; HUMANS; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; POLYETHYLENES; PUBLIC HEALTH; REFUSE DISPOSAL; SOIL POLLUTANTS;

EID: 0345552050     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00025-4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Stessel R.I., Hodge J.H. Chemical resistance testing of geomembrane liners. J. Hazard. Mater. 42:1995;265-287.
2. R.I. Stessel, W.M. Barrett, X. Li, Comparison of the effects of testing conditions and chemical exposure on geomembranes using the comprehensive testing system, J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 70 (11) 2097-2110.
3. Gibbs L.M. Gasoline specifications, regulations and properties. Automotive Engineering. 104(10):1996;35-40.
4. A.M. Hochhausser, Gasoline and other motor fuels, in: Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Fourth Edition. Wiley Interscience Publication, Wiley, New York, 1994, pp. 341-388.
5. K. Owen, T. Coley, Automotive Fuels Reference Book, 2nd edn., Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 1989.
6. Twu C.H., Coon J.E. Predict octane numbers using a generalized interaction method. Hydrocarbon Process. 76:1996;65-68.
7. J.G. Speight, The Chemistry and Technology of Petroleum, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1980.
8. Cline P.V., Delfino J.J., Rao P.S.C. Partitioning of aromatic constituents into water from gasoline and other complex covalent mixtures. Environ. Sci. Technol. 25:1991;914-920.
9. American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard Test Methods for Rubber Properties - Effects of Liquids, D471-96, ASTM, Philadelphia, 1996.
10. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Compatibility test for waste and membrane liners, method 9090, in: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste (SW-846), 3rd edn., Washington, DC, 1992.
11. R.I. Stessel, P.M. Goldsmith, Flexible membrane liners in waste management, J. Air and Waste Management Assoc. 42 (9) 1178-1185.
12. R.I. Stessel, D. Gopal, Using multi-axial testing to determine the effects of temperature on HDPE geomembrane liners, Waste Management and Res., forthcoming.
13. W.M. Barrett, Determination of the effect of exposure to gasoline components on a high density polyethylene geomembrane using the comprehensive test system, PhD Dissertation, University of South Florida, Tampa, 1998.
14. R.I. Stessel, Optimal configuration and test parameters for the comprehensive test system for geomembrane liners, Paper 97-MP25.03. Proc. Ann. Meet. Air and Waste Manage. Assoc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1997.
15. GSE Lining Technology, Quality Assurance, GSE Lining Technology, Houston, 1996.
16. X. Li, The effects of multi-component leachates on HDPE liners, M.S.E. Thesis, University of South Florida, Tampa, 1995.
17. J.M. Chambers, W.S. Cleveland, B. Kleiner, P.A. Tukey, Graphical methods for data analysis, Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole Publishing, Advanced Books and Software, Pacific Grove, CA, 1983.
18. R. Miller, Multiple comparisons, in: Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, Vol. 5, Wiley, New York, 1985, 6790-689.