Route learning by insects

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 718-725

  Collett, Thomas S ^a   Graham, Paul ^a   Durier, Virginie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANT; FORAGING; INSECT; LEARNING; MEMORY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; VELOCITY;

EID: 0345549513     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2003.10.004     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Collett TS, Zeil J: Places and landmarks: an arthropod perspective. In Spatial Representation in Animals. Edited by Healy S. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998:18-53.
2. Collett T.S., Collett M. Memory use in insect visual navigation. Nat Rev Neurosci. 3:2002;542-552 A review of recent progress in visually controlled navigation in ants and bees.
3. Janzen D.H. Euglossine bees as long-distance pollinators of tropical plants. Science. 171:1971;203-205.
4. Santschi F. Comment s'orientent les fourmis. [How do ants navigate?]. Rev Suisse Zool. 21:1913;347-425.
5. Collett T.S., Dillmann E., Giger A., Wehner R. Visual landmarks and route following in desert ants. J Comp Physiol [A]. 170:1992;435-442.
6. Wehner R., Michel B., Antonsen P. Visual navigation in insects: coupling of egocentric and geocentric information. J Exp Biol. 199:1996;129-140.
7. Klotz J.H. Topographic orientation in two species of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insectes Sociaux. 34:1986;236-251.
8. Harrison J.F., Fewell J.H., Stiller T.M., Breed M.D. Effects of experience on use of orientation cues in the giant tropical ant. Anim Behav. 37:1989;869-871.
9. Schmid-Hempel P. Individually different foraging methods in the desert ant Cataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 14:1984;263-271.
10. Wehner R. Spatial organization of foraging behaviour in individually searching desert ants, Cataglyphis (Sahara desert) and Ocymyrmex (Namib desert). Experientia Suppl. 54:1987;15-42.
11. Wehner R., Müller M. How do ants acquire their celestial ephemeris function? Naturwissenschaften. 80:1993;331-333.
12. Dyer F.C., Dickinson J.A. Development of sun compensation by honey bees. How partially experienced bees estimate the sun's course. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 91:1994;4471-4474.
13. Collett M., Collett T.S., Wehner R. Calibration of vector navigation in desert ants. Curr Biol. 9:1999;1031-1034.
14. Wehner R., Gallizzi K., Frei C., Vesely M. Calibration processes in desert ant navigation: vector courses and systematic search. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 188:2002;683-693 Desert ants adjust the direction of their home vector when they are repeatedly displaced from their feeding site to a fixed release site from which they must make their way home (e.g. [13]). On arrival at the nest after such displacement, they experience an error between the state of their PI accumulator and the known PI coordinates of the nest. After very few trips, the direction and distance of their home vector has partially compensated for this error. Changes to the ants' search behaviour may also reduce the error.
15. Collett T.S., Collett M., Wehner R. The guidance of desert ants by extended landmarks. J Exp Biol. 204:2001;1635-1639.
16. Pratt S., Brooks S.E., Franks N.F. The use of edges in visual navigation by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Ethology. 107:2001;1125-1136.
17. •] show that ants control their route relative to a wall by learning the wall's angular elevation viewed from the route. Ants can keep a set distance from a wall, or follow an oblique path to a wall. When the wall is made higher, trained ants move out further from it and when it is lowered, they move towards it. The fine structure of the ant's path is sinuous: the ant scans through about 60° with its frontal visual field, turning further away from than towards the wall. This scanning pattern suggests that ants memorise the height of the wall with their frontal visual field.
18. Chittka L., Kunze J., Shipman C., Buchman S.L. The significance of landmarks for path integration of homing honey bee foragers. Naturwissenshaften. 82:1995;341-343.
19. von Frisch K: The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees. London: Oxford University Press; 1967.
20. Graham P., Fauria K., Collett T.S. The influence of beacon-aiming on the routes of wood ants. J Exp Biol. 206:2003;535-541 By having beacons either on the left or right site of a route, it is shown that routes are strongly biased towards visual beacons.
21. Collett T.S., Baron J., Sellen K. On the encoding of movement vectors by honeybees. Are distance and direction represented independently? J Comp Physiol [A]. 179:1996;395-406.
22. Srinivasan M.V., Zhang S.W., Bidwell N.J. Visually mediated odometry in honeybees. J Exp Biol. 200:1997;2513-2522.
23. Collett M., Collett T.S., Bisch S., Wehner R. Local and global vectors in desert ant navigation. Nature. 394:1998;269-272.
24. Bisch-Knaden S., Wehner R. Local vectors in desert ants: context-dependent landmark learning during outbound and homebound runs. J Comp Physiol [A]. 189:2003;181-187 Desert ants require very few homeward trips to acquire nest-directed local vectors.
25. Sassi S., Wehner R. Dead reckoning in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis: can homeward vectors be reactivated by familiar landmark configurations? Proc Neurobiol Conf Göttingen. 25:1997;484.
26. Collett M., Collett T.S., Chameron S., Wehner R. Do familiar landmarks reset the global path integration system of desert ants? J Exp Biol. 206:2003;877-882 To test whether desert ants recall a long-term memory of a global path integration vector on arriving at a familiar food-site, ants were trained in channels along an L-shaped route to a feeder so that natural landmarks were invisible. Artificial landmarks were attached to the latter part of the route. Home vectors performed after a normal route, or with the first leg of the L shortened or extended, always reflected the immediately preceding outward journey, suggesting that neither the artificial landmarks nor a familiar feeding site evoked a stored home vector.
27. Menzel R., Brandt R., Gumbert A., Komischke B., Kunze J. Two spatial memories for honeybee navigation. Proc R Soc Lond B. 267:2000;961-968.
28. Zeil J., Hoffmann M.I., Chahl J.S. Catchment areas of panoramic snapshots in outdoor scenes. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 20:2003;450-469 Panoramic snapshots were taken by a camera outdoors at regular intervals over a 2D or 3D grid. Root mean square pixel differences were measured between these images and a reference image stored at one grid location. This difference measure increases continuously with distance from the reference location, suggesting that view-based homing with a panoramic snapshot can be achieved without identifying individual landmarks.
29. Durier V., Graham P., Collett T.S. Snapshot memories and the use of landmarks in wood ants. Curr Biol. 13:2003;1614-1618 On their approach to a remembered goal, ants fixate and deviate towards landmarks that appear smaller than their angular size when viewed from the goal, suggesting that snapshot memories are acquired while facing landmarks at the goal and are later recalled at a distance from the goal.
30. Fry S.N., Wehner R. Honey bees store landmarks in an egocentric frame of reference. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 187:2002;1009-1016 Honeybees foraged indoors at a sucrose feeder that was placed a short distance from a triangular arrangement of three cylinders in the centre of an arena. The bees used their approach direction to the centre to determine their search position relative to the array showing that alignment of their memory with their view of the landmark array can be accomplished without external compass cues.
31. Åkesson S., Wehner R. Visual navigation in desert ants Cataglyphis fortis: are snapshots coupled to a celestial system of reference? J Exp Biol. 205:2002;1971-1978 Compass cues and approach direction are shown to be important for aligning retinotopic memories of landmarks with the outside world.
32. Tinbergen N: Über die Orientierung des Bienenwolfes (Philanthus triangulum Fabr.). [On the navigation of the sand wasp (Philanthus triangulum Fabr.)] Z verg Physiol 1932, 16: 305-334.
33. Zeil J. Orientation flights of solitary wasps (Cerceris; sphecidae; hymenoptera.) I. J Comp Physiol [A]. 172:1993;207-222.
34. Lehrer M. Why do bees turn back and look? J Comp Physiol [A]. 172:1993;549-563.
35. Wei C.A., Rafalko S.L., Dyer F.C. Deciding to learn: modulation of learning flights in honeybees, Apis mellifera. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 188:2002;725-737 A study of factors that modulate the duration and frequency of learning flights. Learning flights last longer in an environment with many rather than few artificial landmarks. Flights reappear if bees are delayed from finding food at a familiar food site. The occurrence of learning flights at a new location is influenced by the sucrose concentration found there.
36. van Iersel J.J.A., van den Assem J. Aspects of orientation in the digger wasp Bembix rotrata. Anim Behav. 1:1964;145-162.
37. Srinivasan M.V., Zhang S.W., Lehrer M. Honeybee navigation: odometry with monocular input. Anim Behav. 56:1998;1245-1259.
38. Capaldi E.A., Dyer F.C. The role of orientation flights on homing performance in honeybees. J Exp Biol. 202:1999;1655-1666.
39. Wahl O: Neue Untersuchungen über das Zietgedächtnisses der Bienen. [New experiments concerning the time-sense of bees]. Z vergl Physiol 1932, 16:529-589.
40. Harrison J.M., Breed M.D. Temporal learning in the giant tropical ant, Paraponera clavata. Physiol Entomol. 12:1987;317-320.
41. Menzel R., Geiger K., Joerges J., Müller U., Chittka L. Bees travel novel homeward routes by integrating separately acquired vector memories. Anim Behav. 55:1998;139-152.
42. Lindauer M. Time-compensated sun orientation in bees. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 25:1960;371-377.
43. Koltermann R: 24-Std-Periodik in der Langzeiterrinerung an Duft- und Farbsignale bei der Honigbiene. [Circadian effects in the long-term odour and colour memories of honeybees]. Z vergl Physiol 1971, 75:49-68.
44. Gould J.L. Honey bees store learned flower-landing behaviour according to time of day. Anim Behav. 35:1987;1579-1581.
45. Seeley T.D., Towne W.F. Tactics of dance choice in honey bees: do foragers compare dances? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 30:1992;59-69.
46. Kühnholz S., Seeley T.D. The control of water collection in honey bee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 41:1997;407-422.
47. Steiner A: Die Arbeitsteilung der Feldwespe Polistes dubia K. [Task-scheduling in the wasp, Polistes dubia K]. Z vergl Physiol 1932, 17:101-152.
48. Greggers U., Mauelshagen J. Matching behaviour of honeybees in a multiple choice situation: the differential effect of environmental stimuli on the choice process. Anim Learn Behav. 25:1997;458-472.
49. Chittka L., Geiger K., Kunze J. The influences of landmarks on distance estimation of honey bees. Anim Behav. 50:1995;23-31.
50. Srinivasan M.V., Zhang S.W., Zhu H. Honeybees link sights to smells. Nature. 396:1998;637-638.
51. Giurfa M., Zhang S.W., Jenett A., Menzel R., Srinivasan M.V. The concepts of 'sameness' and 'difference' in an insect. Nature. 410:2001;930-933.
52. Menzel R, Giurfa M, Gerber B, Hellstern F: Cognition in insects: the honeybee as a study case. In Brain evolution and cognition. Edited by Roth G, and Wulliman MF. New York: John Wiley; 2001.
53. Zhang S.W., Lehrer M., Srinivasan M.V. Honeybee memory: navigation by associative grouping and recall of visual stimuli. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 72:1999;180-201.