Supplementation of phylogenetically correct data by two-species comparison: Support for correlated evolution of foraging mode and prey chemical discrimination in lizards extended by first intrageneric evidence

Oikos

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 97-104

  Cooper Jr , William E ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY PURDUE UNIVERSITY FORT WAYNE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOLUTION; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; LIZARD;

AUTARCHOGLOSSA; LACERTIDAE; SCINCOMORPHA; SCLEROGLOSSA; SQUAMATA;

EID: 0345540641     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3547000     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Arnold, E. N. 1990. Why do morphological phylogenies vary in quality? An investigation based on comparative history of lizard clades. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 240: 135-172.
2. Arnold, E. N. 1991. Relationships of the South African lizards assigned to Aporosaura, Meroles, and Pedioplanis. - J. Nat. Hist. 25: 783-807.
3. Arnold, E. N. 1993. Phylogeny and the Lacertidae. - In: Valakos, E. D., Böhme, W., Pérez-Mellado, V. and Maragou, P. (eds), Lacertids of the Mediterranean Region: a biological approach. Hellenic Zoological Society, Athens, pp. 1-16.
4. Brooks, D. R. and McLennan, D. A. 1991. Phylogeny, ecology, and behavior. - Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
5. Burghardt, G. M. 1973. Chemical release of prey attack: extension to naive newly hatched lizards, Eumeces laticeps. Copeia 1973: 178-181.
6. Campbell, J. A. and Camarillo, J. L. 1994. A new lizard of the genus Diploglossus (Anguidae, Diploglossinae) from Mexico, with a review of the Mexican and Central American species. - Herpetologica 50: 193-209.
7. Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1981. Visual guidance of predatory attack by a scincid lizard, Eumeces laticeps. - Anim. Behav. 29: 1127-1136.
8. Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1989a. Absence of prey odor discrimination by iguanid and agamid lizards in applicator tests. - Copeia 1989: 472-478.
9. Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1989b. Prey odor discrimination in the varanoid lizards Heloderma suspectum and Varanus exanthematicus. - Ethology 81: 250-258.
10. Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1990a. Prey odor detection by teiid and lacertid lizards and the relationship of prey odor detection to foraging mode in lizard families. - Copeia 1990: 237-242.
11. Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1990b. Prey odor discrimination by anguid lizards. - Herpetologica 46: 183-190.
12. Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1991. Responses to prey chemicals by a lacertid lizard. Podarcis muralis: prey chemical discrimination and poststrike elevation in tongue-flick rate. - J. Chem. Ecol. 17: 849-863.
13. Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1992. Prey odor discrimination and poststrike elevation in tongue-flicking by a cordylid lizard, Gerrhosaurus nigrolineatus. - Copeia 1992: 146-154.
14. Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1994a. Chemical discrimination by tongue-flicking in lizards: a review with hypotheses on its origin and its ecological and phylogenetic relationships. J. Chem. Ecol. 20: 439-487.
15. Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1994b. Prey chemical discrimination, foraging mode, and phylogeny. - In: Vitt, L. J. and Pianka, E. R. (eds), Lizard ecology: historical and experimental perspectives. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ. pp. 95-116.
16. Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1994c. Absence of prey chemical discrimination by tongue-flicking in an ambush-foraging autarchoglossan lizard. - Ethology 97: 317-328.
17. Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1994d. Multiple functions of extraoral lingual behavior in iguanian lizards: prey capture, grooming, and swallowing, but not prey detection. - Anim. Behav. 47: 65-75.
18. Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1995a. Foraging mode, prey chemical discrimination, and phylogeny in lizards. - Anim. Behav. 50: 973-985.
19. Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1995b. Prey chemical discrimination and foraging mode in gekkonoid lizards. - Herpetol. Monogr. 9: 120-129.
20. Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1997. Correlated evolution of prey chemical discrimination with foraging, lingual morphology and vomeronasal chemoreceptor abundance in lizards. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41: 257-265.
21. Cooper, W. E., Jr. and Vitt, L. J. 1989. Prey odor discrimination by the broad-headed skink (Eumeces laticeps). - J. Exp. Zool. 249: 11-16.
22. Cooper, W. E., Jr. and Alberts, A. C. 1990. Responses to chemical food stimuli by an herbivorous, actively foraging lizard, Dipsosaurus dorsalis. - Herpetologica 46: 259-266.
23. Cooper, W. E., Jr. and Burghardt, G. M. 1990. A comparative analysis of scoring methods for chemical discrimination of prey by squamate reptiles. J. Chem. Ecol. 16: 45-65
24. Cooper, W. E., Jr. and van Wyk, J. H. 1994. Absence of prey chemical discrimination by tongue-flicking in an ambush-foraging lizard having actively foraging ancestors. Ethology 97: 317-328.
25. Estes, R., De Queiroz, K. and Gauthier, J. 1988. Phylogenetic relationships within Squamata. - In: Estes, R. and Pregill, G. (eds), Phylogenetic relationships of the lizard families. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 119-281.
26. Evans, L. T. 1961. Structure as related to behavior in the organization of populations of reptiles. - In: Blair, W. F. (ed.), Vertebrate speciation. Univ. of Texas Press, Houston, TX, pp. 148-178.
27. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. - Am. Nat. 125: 1-15.
28. Fitch, H. S. 1935. Natural history of the alligator lizards. -Trans. Acad. Sci. St. Louis 29: 1-38.
29. Frost, D. R. and Etheridge, R. 1989. A phylogenetic analysis and taxonomy of iguanian lizards (Reptilia: Squamata). -Misc. Publ. Univ. Kansas Mus. Nat. Hist. 81: 1-65.
30. Garland, T. G., Jr. and Adolph, S. C. 1994. Why not to do two-species comparative studies: limitations on inferring adaptation. - Physiol. Zool. 67: 797-828.
31. Gauthier, J., Estes, R. and de Queiroz, K. 1988. A phylogenetic analysis of Lepidosauromorpha. - In: Estes, R. and Pregill, G. (eds), Phylogenetic relationships of the lizard families. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 15-98.
32. Harvey, P. H. and Pagel, M. D. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. - Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
33. Huey, R. B. and Pianka, E. R. 1981. Ecological consequences of foraging mode. - Ecology 62: 991-999.
34. Karges, J. P. and Wright, J. W. 1987. A new species of Barisia (Sauria, Anguidae) from Oaxaca, Mexico. - Contrib. Sci. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles County 381: 1-11.
35. Kingsbury, B. A. 1995. Field metabolic rates of a eurythermic lizard. - Herpetologica 51: 155-159.
36. Kluge, A. G. 1987. Cladistic relationships among the Gekkonoidea. - Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan 173: 1-54.
37. Lang, M. 1991. Generic relationships within the Cordyliformes (Reptilia: Squamata). - Bull. Inst. R. Sci. Nat. Belg. Biol. 61: 121-188.
38. Maddison, W. P. 1990. A method for testing the correlated evolution of two binary characters: are gains or losses concentrated on certain branches of a phylogenetic tree? -Evolution 44: 539-557.
39. Maddison, W. P. and Maddison, D. R. 1992. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. ver. 3. -Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
40. Magnusson, W. E., Junqueira de Paiva, L., Moreira da Rocha, R., Franke, C. R., Kasper, L. A. and Lima, A. P. 1985. The correlates of foraging mode in a community of Brazilian lizards. - Herpetologica 41: 324-332.
41. Moermond, T. C. 1979. The influence of habitat structure on Anolis foraging behaviour. - Behaviour 70: 147-167.
42. Pagel, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255: 37-45.
43. Perry, G. 1995. The evolutionary ecology of lizard foraging: a comparative study. - Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
44. Perry, G., Lampl, I., Lerner, A., Rothenstein, D., Shani, E., Sivan, N. and Werner, Y. L. 1990. Foraging mode in lacertid lizards: variation and correlates. - Amphib.-Rept. 11: 373-384.
45. Ridley, M. 1983. The explanation of organic diversity: the comparative method and adaptations for mating. -Clarendon Press, Oxford.
46. Sillén-Tullberg, B. S. 1993. The effect of biased inclusion of taxa on the correlation between discrete characters in phylogenetic trees. - Evolution 47: 1182-1191.
47. Vitt, L. J. and Congdon, J. D. 1978. Body shape, reproductive effort, and relative clutch mass in lizards: resolution of a paradox. - Am. Nat. 112: 595-608.
48. Vitt, L. J. and Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1986. Foraging and diet of a diurnal predator (Eumeces laticeps) feeding on hidden prey. - J. Herpetol. 20: 408-515.
49. Winer, B. J. 1962. Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw-Hill, New York.
50. Wright, S. P. 1992. Adjusted P-values for simultaneous inference. - Biometrics 48: 1005-1013.
51. Zar, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis, 2nd ed. - Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.