Muscle fiber conduction velocity at different states of isotonic contraction

Muscle and Nerve

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 1126-1128

  Mitrovic, Sascha ^a   Lüder, Günter ^a   Hopf, Hanns Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MAINZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Contraction time; Isotonic contraction; Relative twitch force; Single fiber conduction velocity; Supernormal phase

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BICEPS BRACHII MUSCLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MUSCLE ACTION POTENTIAL; MUSCLE FIBER MEMBRANE CONDUCTANCE; MUSCLE ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; MUSCLE ISOTONIC CONTRACTION; MUSCLE STRETCHING; MUSCLE TWITCH; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN CONDUCTANCE;

ADULT; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HUMANS; ISOTONIC CONTRACTION; MALE; MUSCLE FIBERS; NEURAL CONDUCTION;

EID: 0345517267     PISSN: 0148639X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199908)22:8<1126::AID-MUS18>3.0.CO;2-M     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Arendt-Nielsen L, Forster A, Mills K. The relationship between muscle fiber conduction velocity and force in the human vastus lateralis. J Physiol 1984;353:6P.
2. Broman H, Bilotto G, DeLuca CJ. Myoelectric signal conduction velocity and spectral parameters: influence of force and time. J Appl Physiol 1985;58:1428-1437.
3. Buchthal F, Guld C, Rosenfalck P. Propagation velocity in electrically activated muscle fibers in man. Acta Physiol Scand 1955;34:75-89.
4. Cruz Martinez A. Conduction velocity in human muscle fibers in situ. Study in upper and lower limbs in healthy adults. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989;29:263-268.
5. Hakansson CH. Action potential and mechanical response of isolated cross striated frog muscle fibers at different degrees of stretch. Acta Physiol Scand 1957;41:199-216.
6. Hakansson CH. Conduction velocity and amplitude of the action potential as related to the circumference in the isolated fiber in frog. Acta Physiol Scand 1956;39:291-312.
7. Kereshi S, Manzano G, McComas J. Impulses conduction velocity in human biceps brachii muscles. Exp Neurol 1983;80: 652-662.
8. Martin AR. The effect of change in length on conduction velocity in muscle. J Physiol 1954;125:215-220.
9. Naeije M, Zorn H. Relation between EMG power spectrum shifts and muscle fiber action potential conduction velocity changes during local muscular fatigue in man. Eur J Appl Physiol 1982;50:23-33.
10. Nishizono H, Fujimoto T, Ohtake H, Miyashita M. Muscle fiber conduction velocity and contractile properties estimated from surface electrode arrays. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990;75:74-81.
11. Nishizono H, Kurata H, Miyashita M. Muscle fiber conduction velocity related to stimulation rate. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988;72:529-534.
12. Oetliker H, Schūmperli RA. Influence of sarcomere length, tonicity, and external sodium concentration on conduction velocity in frog muscle fibers. J Physiol 1982;332:203-221.
13. Sadoyama T, Masuda T. Changes of the average muscle fiber conduction velocity during a varying force contraction. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987;67:495-497.
14. Sadoyama T, Masuda T, Miyano H. Relationships between muscle fiber conduction velocity and frequency parameters of surface EMG during sustained contraction. Eur J Appl Physiol 1983;51:247-256.
15. Stalberg E. Propagation velocity in human muscle fibers in situ. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl 1966;287:1-112.
16. Troni W, Cantello R, Rainero I. Conduction velocity along human muscle fibers in situ. Neurology 1983;33:1453-1459.
17. Trontelj JV. Muscle fiber conduction velocity changes with length. Muscle Nerve 1993;16:506-512.