Population coding and behavioral choice

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 826-831

  Kristan Jr , William B ^a   Shaw, Brian K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY;

EID: 0345515984     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4388(97)80142-0     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Tinbergen N: The Study of Instinct. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1951.
2. Von Frisch K: The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap; 1967.
3. Lorenz K: Foundations of Ethology. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1981.
4. Morton DW, Chiel HJ: Neural architectures for adaptive behavior. Trends Neurosci 1994, 17:413-420.
5. Sparks DH, Holland R, Guthrie BL: Size and distribution of movement fields in the monkey superior colliculus. Brain Res 1976, 113:21-34.
6. Georgopoulos AP, Caminiti R, Kalaska JF, Massey JT: Spatial coding of movement: a hypothesis concerning the coding of movement direction by motor cortical populations. Exp Brain Res 1983, 7(suppl):327-336.
7. Lockery SR, Wittenberg G, Kristan WB Jr, Cottrell GW: Function of identified interneurons in the leech elucidated using networks trained by back-propagation. Nature 1989, 340:468-471.
8. Theunissen FE, Miller JP: Representation of sensory information in the cricket cereal sensory system. II. Information theoretic calculation of system accuracy and optimal tuning-curve widths of four primary interneurons. J Neurophysiol 1991, 66:1690-1703.
9. Beiser DG, Sherwin EH, Houk JC: Network models of the basal ganglia. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1997, 7:185-190.
10. Duncan J, Humphreys G, Ward R: Competitive brain activity in visual attention. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1997, 7:255-261.
11. Wiersma CAG, Ikeda K: Interneurons commanding swimmeret movements in the crayfish, Procambarus clarkii (Girard). Comp Biochem Physiol 1964, 12:509-525.
12. Grillner S: Locomotion in vertebrates: central mechanisms and reflex interaction. Physiol Rev 1975, 55:247-304.
13. Kupfermann I, Weiss KR: The command neuron concept Behav Brain Sci 1978, 1:3-10.
14. Kovac MP, Davis WJ: Neural mechanisms underlying behavioral choice in Pleurobranchaea. J Neurophysiol 1980, 43:469-487.
15. Krasne FB, Lee SC: Response-dedicated trigger neurons as control points for behavioral actions: selective inhibition of lateral giant command neurons during feeding in crayfish. J Neurosci 1988, 8:3703-3712.
16. Edwards DH: Mutual inhibition among neural command systems as a possible mechanism for behavioral choice in crayfish. J Neurosci 1991, 11:1210-1223.
17. Tyrrell T: The use of hierarchies for action selection. Adaptive Behav 1993, 1:387-420.
18. Xin Y, Weiss KR, Kupfermann I: A pair of identified interneurons in Aplysia that are involved in multiple behaviors are necessary and sufficient for the arterial-shortening component of a local withdrawal reflex. J Neurosci: 1996, 16:4518-4528. A single, higher-order identified interneuron in Aplysia, cell CC5, is sufficient and necessary for the arterial shortening component of the local tentacular withdrawal response, and the bilateral pair of CC5 neurons may be sufficient and necessary for the arterial shortening component of the head withdrawal response. Hence, this single neuron qualifies as a command neuron for arterial shortening, a component of withdrawal responses.
19. Xin Y, Weiss KR, Kupfermann I: An identified interneuron contributes to aspects of six different behaviors in Aplysia. J Neurosci 1996, 16:5266-5279. This study provides evidence that CC5, shown to play a critical role in arterial shortening in Aplysia [18•], also contributes to five other distinct behaviors. CC5 receives synaptic inputs during a variety of behaviors, and connects to motor neurons and interneurons involved in several behaviors. By monitoring a neuron targeted by CC5 during each of the behaviors, before and after eliminating the input from CC5 to this neuron, the authors showed that CC5 plays roles of varying importance in the different behaviors.
20. Shaw BK, Kristan WB: The neuronal basis of the behavioral choice between swimming and shortening in the leech: control is not selectively exercised at higher circuit levels. J Neurosci 1997, 17:786-795. Swimming and shortening are two incompatible whole-body behaviors performed by the leech. The neuronal circuit underlying swimming is organized hierarchically and contains three interneuronal levels, including two upper levels of command-like neurons. This study monitored the responses of swim circuit interneurons to mechanosensory stimuli that produced shortening. The majority of the swim circuit neurons, including most of the command-like cells and all neurons at the highest hierarchical level, were excited by stimuli that produced shortening. Only a subset of neurons, including one of the command-like cells, were inhibited during shortening.
21. Brodfuehrer PD, Debski EA, O'Gara BA, Friesen WO: Neuronal control of leech swimming. J Neurobiol 1995, 27:403-418.
22. Wu JY, Cohen LB, Falk CX: Neuronal activity during different behaviors in Aplysia: a distributed organization? Science 1994, 263:820-823.
23. Berkowitz A, Stein PS: Activity of descending propriospinal axons in the turtle hindlimb enlargement during two forms of fictive scratching: broad tuning to regions of the body surface. J Neurosci 1994, 14:5089-5104.
24. Newsome WT: Deciding about motion: linking perception to action. J Comp Physiol [A] 1997, 181:5-12.
25. Britten KH, Newsome WT, Shadlen MN, Celebrini S, Movshon JA: A relationship between behavioral choice and the visual responses of neurons in macaque MT. Visual Neurosci 1996, 13:87-100. Single-cell recordings were made in the middle temporal area (MT) of monkeys while they performed a forced-choice visual discrimination task. A trial-to-trial correlation was tested between the monkey's choice and the activity of single neurons, under conditions in which the stimulus remained the same. A modest, but significant, correlation was found. The authors argue, based on the weakness of this relationship for any given neuron and on the prevalence of the relationship across the group of neurons studied, that large pools of neurons probably contribute to the behavioral decision.
26. Salzman CD, Newsome WT: Neural mechanisms for forming a perceptual decision. Science 1994, 264:231-237.
27. Shadlen MN, Britten KH, Newsome WT, Movshon JA: A computational analysis of the relationship between neuronal and behavioral responses to visual motion. J Neurosci 1996, 16:1486-1510. A modeling study, utilizing the experimental results of [25•] and other studies by Newsome and his colleagues. The model simulated the process by which activity in pools of area MT neurons result in a behavioral decision. Various parameters and features of the model were adjusted to yield the best agreement with the detailed experimental findings.
28. Groh JM, Born RT, Newsome WT: How is a sensory map read out? Effects of microstimulation in visual area MT on saccades and smooth pursuit eye movements. J Neurosci 1997, 17:4312-4330. Microstimulation in MT in monkeys making either saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements affected both the direction and velocity of the movements. Usually the microstimulation added a component to the velocity signal as though the population code used was a vector average rather than other codes, such as vector sum or winner-take-all. These results, along with previous work [26], suggest that the same area of cortex can be used in more than one coding scheme, depending upon the task being performed.
29. Shadlen MN, Newsome WT: Motion perception: seeing and deciding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:628-633. Single cells were recorded in the lateral intraparietal region (LIP), which receives input from area MT, using a forced-choice visual discrimination task similar to that used by the same investigators in studying MT. The activity patterns of some of the LIP neurons indicate that they could be used in forming decisions.
30. Heiligenberg W: Neural Nets in Electric Fish. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 1991.
31. Norekian TP, Satterlie RA: Whole body withdrawal circuit and its involvement in the behavioral hierarchy of the mollusk Clione limacina. J Neurophysiol 1996, 75:529-537. A newly identified set of neurons in Clione, the pleural withdrawal (PI-W) neurons, are sufficient to produce whole-body withdrawal when stimulated. The PI-W cells receive inhibition from neurons involved in feeding behavior, and, in turn, inhibit neurons involved in swimming. This mirrors the behavioral priority sequence of Clione: feeding dominates whole-body withdrawal, and whole-body withdrawal dominates swimming.
32. Dickinson PS: Interactions among neural networks for behavior. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1995, 5:792-798.
33. Blitz DM, Nusbaum MP: Motor pattern selection via inhibition of parallel pathways. J Neurosci 1997, 17:4965-4975. Previous work had shown that stimulation of an identified modulatory projection neuron (MPN), which projects to the stomatogastric ganglion (STG) of the crab, could elicit a particular pyloric rhythm from the STG. This study demonstrates that MPN additionally suppresses the gastric mill rhythm, and that it does so by inhibiting other projection neurons.
34. Norris BJ, Coleman MJ, Nusbaum MP: Pyloric motor pattern modification by a newly identified projection neuron in the crab stomatogastric nervous system. J Neurophysiol 1996, 75:97-108. Describes a newly identified projection neuron in the crab, modulatory commissural neuron 5 (MCN5). This neuron elicits a distinct and unique pyloric rhythm in the stomatogastric ganglion (STG) when stimulated.
35. Soffe SR: Two distinct rhythmic motor patterns are driven by common premotor and motor neurons in a simple vertebrate spinal cord. J Neurosci 1993, 13:4456-4469.
36. Soffe SR: Motor patterns for two distinct rhythmic behaviors evoked by excitatory amino acid agonists in the Xenopus embryo spinal cord. J Neurophysiol 1996, 75:1815-1825. Applying the same glutamate receptor agonists can produce either swimming or struggling in the Xenopus embryo, depending on the concentration: lower concentrations cause swimming, higher concentrations cause struggling. This occurs without activation of the Rohon-Beard sensory neurons, disproving an earlier hypothesis that release of a neuromodulator from the Rohon-Beard cells is what determines whether swimming or struggling is expressed.
37. Soffe SR: The pattern of sensory discharge can determine the motor response in young Xenopus tadpoles. J Comp Physiol [A] 1 997, 180:711-715. The pattern of discharge in Rohon-Beard sensory neurons was manipulated directly using intracellular stimulation. Depending on the sensory discharge pattern, either swimming or a struggling-like motor pattern could be elicited: brief discharges caused swimming, whereas repetitive discharges yielded the struggling-like pattern.
38. Valdez CM, Nishikawa KC: Sensory modulation and behavioral choice during feeding in the Australian frog, Cyclorana novaehollandiae. J Comp Physiol [A] 1997, 180:187-202.
39. Fukai T, Tanaka S: A simple neural network exhibiting selective activation of ensembles: from winner-take-all to winners-share-all. Neural Comput 1997, 9:77-97.
40. Shaw BK, Kristan WB: The whole-body shortening reflex of the medicinal leech: motor pattern, sensory basis, and interneuronal pathways. J Comp Physiol [A] 1995, 177:667-681.
41. Ort CA, Kristan WB, Stent GS: Neuronal control of swimming in the leech. II. Identification and connections of the motor neurons. J Comp Physiol 1974, 94:121-154.
42. Weeks J: Segmental specialization of a leech swim-initiating interneuron, cell 205. J Neurosci 1982, 2:972-985.