The relative efficacy of different forms of knowledge of results for the learning of a new relative timing pattern

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 56 A, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 621-640

  De Jaeger, Dominique ^a   Proteau, Luc ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; RANDOMIZATION; TIME PERCEPTION;

COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 0345491966     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980244000558     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Blandin, Y., Lhuisset, L., & Proteau, L. (1999). Cognitive processes underlying observational learning of motor skills. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 52A, 957-979.
2. Carter, M. C., & Shapiro, D. C. (1984). Control of sequential movements: evidence for generalized motor programs. Journal of Neurophysiology, 52, 787-796.
3. Delmez-De Jaeger, D., & Schepens, N. (1995). Learning an imposed timing in a sequential arm movement. Perceptual und Motor Skills, 81, 171-188.
4. Doody, S. G., Bird, A. M., & Ross, D. (1985). The effects of auditory and visual models on acquisition of a timing task. Human Movement Science, 4, 271-281.
5. Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381-391.
6. Gentner, D. R. (1987). Timing of skilled motor performance: test of the proportional duration model. Psychological Review, 94, 255-276.
7. Heuer, H. (1988). Testing the invariance of relative timing: Comment of Gentner (1987). Psychological Review, 95, 552-557.
8. Heuer, H. (1991). Invariant relative timing in motor-program theory. In J. Fagard & P. H. Wolff (Eds.), The development of timing control and temporal organization in coordinated action (pp. 37-68). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
9. Heuer, H., & Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Transfer of learning among motor patterns with different relative timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 241-252.
10. Kernodle, M. W., & Carlton, L. G. (1992). Information feedback and the learning of multiple-degree-of-freedom Activities. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24, 187-196.
11. Lai, Q., Shea, C. H., Wulf, G., & Wright, D. L. (2000). Optimizing generalized motor program and parameter learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 10-24.
12. Lee, T. D., & White, M. A. (1990). Influence of an unskilled model's practice schedule on observational motor learning. Human Movement Science, 9, 349-367.
13. Newell, K. M. (1991). Motor skill acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 213-237.
14. Raibert, M. H. (1977). Motor control and learning by the state-space model (Tech.Rep. NO. AI-TR-439). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
15. Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
16. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (1999). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
17. Shapiro, D. C., Zernicke, R. F., Gregor, R. J., & Diestel, J. D. (1981). Evidence for generalized motor programs using gait pattern analysis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 13, 33-47.
18. Shea, C. A., Lai, Q., Wright, D. L., Immink, M., & Black, C. (2001). Consistent and variable practice conditions: Effects on relative and absolute timing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 139-152.
19. Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 179-187.
20. Swinnen, S. P. (1996). Information feedback for motor skill learning: A review. In H. N. Zelaznik (Ed.), Advances in motor learning and control (pp. 37-66). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
21. Viviani, P., & Laissard, G. (1991). Timing control in motor sequences. In J. Fagard & P. H. Wolff (Eds.), The development of timing control and temporal organization in coordinated action (pp. 1-36). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
22. Viviani, P., & Laissard, G. (1996). Motor templates in typing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 417-445.
23. Wulf, G., Lee, T. D., & Schmidt, R. A. (1994). Reducing knowledge of results about relative versus absolute timing: Differential effects on learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 363-369.
24. Wulf, G., Schmidt, R. A., & Deubel, H. (1993). Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterisation learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1134-1150.
25. Zelaznik, H. N., & Spring, J. (1976). Feedback in response recognition and production. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 309-312.